Hello group
I am trying to access some SQL tables created in universe via ODBC with
microsoft access but retreiving the data is very slow - about 2 minuted to
retrieve 91 records with approximately 20 columns of data.
We have tried running the same query on our HP machine and then a Linux
Have you updated the file information cache (HS.UPDATE.FILEINFO)?
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Wally,
How is this addressed in 6.0.8? The 2 gig limit is a hard limit,
set also by the OS isn't it?
Wally Terhune [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/10/2004 02:47 PM
Please respond to u2-users
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE:
oops
no it doesnt
that was a hundred years ago and Pr1mos
god i'm getting old
-Original Message-
From: Bob Witney
Sent: 11 August 2004 11:59
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [U2] Paragraphs in Files Other Than VOC
Under universe you dont need pointers if it cant find an item in
Have you tried an alternative to MS? Try using something lightweight like
GPs ODBC Query Tool: http://gpoulose.home.att.net/ and see if you still run
into performance problems. (Also, make sure that you have ODBC Tracing
turned off!)
Good luck,
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Jeremy,
I am not sure if this is related, but just in case.
There is an issue with the 10.1 ODBC client. One of our customers that uses
it extensively on Windows 2003 has been experiencing slowdowns to the point
of crashing their web server. We have been working with IBM on the issue
and are
Will,
Do you have that A side by side comparison of it (Wintegrate) and
Accuterm...
I would be interested to see what meaningful features it offers.
Thanks
Lee Bacall
http://www.binarystar.com
Phone: +1 (954) 791-8575
Cell: +1 (954) 655-6581
- Original Message -
From: Mark Johnson
Wouldn't you just create a stub like you would do with PROC's, i.e.
PA
001 PQ
002 [VOCLIB %2]
Then just enter: PA MYPARA
This would run the MYPARA paragraph in the VOCLIB file. This is how I've
done it in the past.
Glenn
At 06:30 AM 8/11/2004, you wrote:
OK, Will, I'll probably regret it, but
Does it HAVE to be Wintegrate ? AccuTerm offer very reasonable site licences
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage an Evolution in Software Development
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August
Mark:
I concur with Ross. AccuTerm offers _very_ reasonable site licensing; I
think it's something like $995 unlimited users. In fact, so much so I'd
wonder why anyone would use wIntegrate at a large site.
However, wIntegrate has:
1) Query Builder
2) Cuts and pastes way faster
and AccuTerm
I must agree that site licencing is a definite plus for Accuterm.
wIntegrate:
1) Allows for widths greater that 132, In some cases, I use width of 200
characters.
2) Open multiple wIntegrate sessions
3) Cut and paste of screen segment (cut paste @15,10 - 72,20) using right
mouse button
4) I
At 01:14 AM 8/11/2004, you wrote:
snip
Although we aren't using schemas, we too have experienced timing issuues
when retrieving data via the UVODBC.
We supply our customers with a 3rd party report writer that connects to
Universe via the UVODBC driver.
Most of the time this works fine, but on
Site licensing is the one advantage I've seen. Wintegrate does all the
other stuff and seems to have a very easy to use interface for calling their
routines. I've used both and tend to favor Wintegrate cost issues aside.
Both are good products.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
For example:
0001: PA
0002: DISPLAY
0003: * A,PROCESS?
0004: DISPLAY
0005: IF PROCESS? = 'Y' THEN GO 10:
0006: GO OUT:
0007: 10 *
0008: DISPLAY YES IT WORKED
0009: OUT: DISPLAY
Bottom at line 9
How can I upcase the PROCESS? ?
This is for UV
George
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL
0001: PA
0002: DISPLAY
0003: * A,PROCESS?
0004: DISPLAY
0005: IF PROCESS? = 'Y' THEN GO 10:
0006: IF PROCESS? = 'y' THEN GO 10:
0007: GO OUT:
0008: 10 *
0009: DISPLAY YES IT WORKED
0010: OUT: DISPLAY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of George
Greeting all,
We have just started having a problem this afternoon with our
UniRPC/Uniobject. The problem appears to be that if more than one
computer connects using Uniobjects at the same time the UniRPC locks up.
However, if you stop and start the UniRPC server again everything works
fine.
I learn so much lurking on this list (some of which I actually get to
use in my work) that I humbly dare to respond:
Glenn wrote:
Well, according to the documentation you can specify a conversion code:
A,PROCESS?,(MCU)
which should apply the conversion code to the input value, but which
appears
On behalf of Peter Schellenbach at Accusoft Enterprises, I would like to
forward the following comments regarding Accuterm that may pertain to this
discussion:
1) AccuTerm supports U2 device licensing.
2) Up to 160 columns
3) The paste speed in AccuTerm is deliberately throttled down to
Lloyd,
Technically, your statement that accuterm ...no longer has a site license
is true, but:
The Site License has been replaced with the Small Business License, which
provides for:
a.Unlimited use at one location, including laptops of employees
officed at that location, for $995 (same
OK, this is a strange one:
Platform: UV 10.0.16 / HP-UX 11.11
I have an SQL table with a multi-part primary key for which I have
specified an alternate separator (dealing wiht those text marks in the
key is annoying).
This works fine...until I create a trigger (any insert/update trigger,
at
There's a very good reason why it works this way. Suppose you have the
following LIST statement:
LIST EMPLOYEE.FILE WITH HIRE.DATE Enter Hire Date,(D)
If the conversion code in the inline prompt replaced the entered value with
the result of the ICONV, the statement would become (assuming
Actually, the separator becomes a null character (char zero), not a text
mark
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 17:31, Geoffrey Mitchell wrote:
OK, this is a strange one:
Platform: UV 10.0.16 / HP-UX 11.11
I have an SQL table with a multi-part primary key for which I have
specified an alternate
I didn't say nor mean to suggest that it was not _at all_ useful. I
have used such an example before myself. I was just recognizing and
agreeing with Glenn that there remain some, perhaps several, situations
and conversion codes where it is not really too helpful, and could
perhaps be enhanced.
Dave:
1) AccuTerm supports U2 device licensing.
I knew that.
2) Up to 160 columns
I knew that.
3) The paste speed in AccuTerm is deliberately throttled down to
accommodate serial connections. The speed can be adjusted in
Tools-Settings-File Transfer. Change the ASCII interline
delay.
For whatever reason, I'm not a fan of Accuterm. I enjoy using the Wintegrate
utilities and WIN.MLSEND for seamless email sending is very attractive. Not
$4000 attractive though. I'm trying to not have different emulators in this
client's system. They already have Accuterm (not 2002) and VE Client
After struggling with BLAT, WIN.MLSEND is a pure gift. Plus, 50% of my
clients also have Wintegrate so when the time comes to add some GUI hooks,
it will be consistent.
I tend to prefer the individual GUI subroutines instead of trying to develop
a whole application with a GUI builder. Very
Was on their web site 4 hours ago and it had 50 for $995.
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] Wintegrate
As of the latest release of accuterm, it no longer has a site license
One of my frustrations with this client that already has Accuterm has been
my inability (frustration) to get it to jump from MV to an internet page.
Any client of mine with UPS shipping can type UPS on a Customer service
screen and jump to ups.com with that tracking number and get the info. Some
So what makes Wintegrate feel so special that they charge $200 per license
with no discounts. Hopefully it's not the IBM thing.
I just wrestled with a dealer who gave me a 12% discount. Nice, but a long
way from being affordable.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Dave Taylor [EMAIL
Mark,
For whatever reason, I'm not a fan of Accuterm. I enjoy using the
Wintegrate
utilities and WIN.MLSEND for seamless email sending is very attractive.
So why not just send email?
Mail me offlist if you would like to beta test our native email utilities
for U2.
Craig
---
u2-users
30 matches
Mail list logo
