Re: [U2] GE and LE question

2005-02-15 Thread CWNoah2
Will, As Larry pointed out, '1N0N' will allow 1 or more integers to pass, while the test for >= 1 and <= MAX.VAL limits the range. If MAX.VAL is 9 now, and is changed later to 10 or more, the same code will work. Regards, Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: Why

[U2] RedBack Performance

2005-02-15 Thread brian
Hi all, I'm on a site doing some work enhancing a web site running RedBack. Except that is not running: it is crawling, and I've never seen RedBack so slow. Their server *is* fairly slow and old (running 9.2 uv on AIX) but on top of the time taken to actually run the subroutines, it seems that v

SV: [U2] RedBack Performance

2005-02-15 Thread Björn Eklund
Hi, do you use state or are you running stateless. We went over to stateless and gained about 60% performance. //Bjvrn -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fren: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 15 februari 2005 15:06 Till: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Dmne: [U2] RedBack P

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread vforste
Glen, Apparently this is a hot topic... Maybe you should throw it up on picksource as well... It's nothing special. Will, In one of your responses you said you added username and pwd to the form. I hope this form is not web accessible, and if it is, you should atleast be serving it ssl. Way to eas

RE: [U2] RedBack Performance

2005-02-15 Thread graham.forbes
Guess you have checked the .ini files which specifies if the responder stays up - state 1 or 2 I think? Graham Forbes Trading Systems BT Consulting & Systems Integration tel: (+44) (0)20 7176 fax: (+44) (0)20 7177 mob: (+44) (0)77407 38550 web: www.bt.com/consulting -Original Mess

[U2] ot: Color laser printer question (quality of print)

2005-02-15 Thread George Gallen
I'm looking at buying a color laser printer for home use. I'm looking at the Konica 2300 DL (2400dpi x 600dpi) and the HP 2550 L (600dpi x 600dpi actual - enhanced resoluation. Anyone have anything good/bad to say about either one? Does the Konica's 2400dpi mean a whole lot? it's not 2400 x 2400,

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Glen B
Vance, Thanks for the invite, but I don't repost other people's code. I finally have MV Developer Central up and running. If anyone is inclined to post snippets in the snippet library, or even start an open source project, then feel free to register and post this kind of stuff. The purpose of t

RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well see now that I'm a seasoned senior type programmer, I'm > expected to know things like ASP and .NET and a hundred other > tools I suppose. But I don't and really it hasn't hurt me > any, but it's always nice to be able to say "ASP? Oh yes I > programmed an web-s

RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue

2005-02-15 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
Dan, I appreciate the info. I am understanding this little by little. I wonder if you could please clarify something for me. Like I mentioned. We were running a DG/UX, Universe system for about 10 years. All files were dynamic and I never had to really get into learning the nity gritty of t

Re: RE: [U2] RedBack Performance

2005-02-15 Thread brian
Thanks, Yes I had. Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15.02.2005, 16:05:16: > Guess you have checked the .ini files which specifies if the responder stays > up - state 1 or 2 I think? > > Graham Forbes > Trading Systems > BT Consulting & Systems Integration > tel: (+44) (0)20 7176 > fax: (+4

Re: [U2] RedBack Performance

2005-02-15 Thread Susan Lynch
Brian, Since you say that the database server is old and slow, have you checked their file sizing on the database server? If poor, that could be contributing to the slowness on both the web and the local applications. Also, does anyone run the Redback Garbage Collection utility periodically? (if

[U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Jeff Schasny
Evidently my IIS isnt aware of the Uniobjects. I have Uniobjects working fine on the same machine in Visual Basic. What have I missed? I'm getting the form page just fine but when I click the "Submit Query" button I get the following: The page cannot be displayed There is a problem with the p

RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10

2005-02-15 Thread Adrian Matthews
Yes but if everything else is equal then clock speed does play a part. Love to use an Opteron but they're not supported so a non-starter. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B Sent: 11 February 2005 18:17 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Ian Renfrew
When you cut and pasted the code you need to save the file as 'index.asp' not 'simple.asp'. Suggest adding this instruction as part of code. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: "Jeff Schasny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2 Group" Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:31 PM Subjec

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Vance wrote: "Will, In one of your responses you said you added username and pwd to the form. I hope this form is not web accessible, and if it is, you should atleast be serving it ssl. Way to easy to sniff in pure http Just my 2 cents..." Vance not sure why you think it's insecure. It's no

Re: [U2] Looking to buy: Turning a quote into a sales order

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
I'm looking for software for a customer (already running Universe) that has quoting, pricing, customer, and sales order abilities. Basic bare-bones, cheapest beast :) or whatever. Throw me your ad with a price. Either buying the source code, or buying your support at a reasonable monthly

[U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Jeff Schasny
Nope. Actualy I had changed the line: So it should work. Anyway, I tried changing everything back to "index.ap" and got the same failure - Original Message - When you cut and pasted the code you need to save the file as 'index.asp' not 'simple.asp'. Suggest adding this instructi

RE: [U2] [UV] &PH& Phantom process IDs

2005-02-15 Thread Adrian Matthews
Yeh, we get loads of those when we restart. Seems a strange way of making the record ID's unique and is worrying when you first see it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 February 2005 07:21 To: u2-users@listserver.u

Re: [U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
1) The IP number you put in doesn't work? Try pinging it. 2) The username and password doesn't work? 3) The directory for the account doesn't work? 4) You mistyped something from the code? You can add debugging text to the code to show you how far it got. I put a "Hello" right inside the top so

Re: [U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread vforste
In the example I used Universe.session.1 as the object pointer. I was using UVDK2.0 to test it before I sent it out, on a newer version change the line. Set Sess = CreateObject("Universe.session.1") to Set Sess = CreateObject("UniObjects.UniOaifCtrl") Vance - Original Message - From: "J

Re: [U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
You don't NEED a form action Jeff, you can get the result to come to the same page without it. I would try that first. Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re: [U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Oops Jeff also do you have OTHER .asp pages working? I don't enough about IIS to know how to say this, but does .asp need to be like ... initialized or something, or started? Or is it just automatic with IIS ? I'm sure someone knows that answer. Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@li

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread George Gallen
yes, but if someone is sniffing the lines, unless the initial page is a https:// page, the username and password will be transmitted across the internet in plain text. Generally this isn't a problem, but if you are on a cable line, anyone on that subnet could realistically view the username/passwor

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Ian Renfrew
I'm looking forward to having the user type 'CLEAR-FILE DATA VOC' and clicking the submit button. Watch the fur fly. Ahh! The wonders of a new interface. Regards, Ian R. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:08 PM Subject: Re: [U2] UV to

Re: [U2] Re: UV to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Jeff after the <% and before the "if" line, on its own line just put this line Response.write "Hello" So that lives outside the if, and see if you get anything --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Re: Uv to web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Jeff Schasny
Bingo! That did it. Thanks - Original Message - In the example I used Universe.session.1 as the object pointer. I was using UVDK2.0 to test it before I sent it out, on a newer version change the line. Set Sess = CreateObject("Universe.session.1") to Set Sess = CreateObject("UniObjects.U

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Vance: "I'm looking forward to having the user type 'CLEAR-FILE DATA VOC' and clicking the submit button. Watch the fur fly." Ian the example is just that :) It's not really meant, at least as far as I go, to actually execute in that manner. It's just an example of how to talk to a session so

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread vforste
Exactly... http is transmitted in plain text accross networks and anyone can sniff it out. Subnet is not even an issue if it's a public page. It is insecure for your system as well. Don't forget when you submit from another location on the internet you are sending that data through switches and rou

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
You know I was going to add the caveat that .asp only works for people running IIS. My client uses IIS, I use Apache on my own machine. So it would be a pain to have to support these .asp pages remotely (i.e. as in couldn't). But I was just reading that Apache DOES have support for .asp "... s

[U2] [UD] 6.0PE on SuSE 9.1?

2005-02-15 Thread Kevin King
I have an zip of udt 6.0 PE that I'm trying to install on SuSE 9.1 w/ glibc 2.3.3.97. Installation goes off without a hitch, but when I try to start udt, the following message is displayed: ../udt: relocation error: ../udt: symbol errno version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link ti

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread vforste
I'm not saying with that example you should leave it the way I posted it, where access is global. In fact I agree with you. The user and pwd should be verified on a user basis for something so open as the example. But what I do say, is that I do not recommend allowing http access to this script if

[U2] Uv Error

2005-02-15 Thread Cooper, Rudy
Hello, Does anyone know what can cause the following error ? 1009: Program "S$WEB.CM.CREATE": Line 8, Error initializing AK file "f:/sage/sagpub9/I_33/INDEX.003". 1010: No CM file. We're on a W2K box running UV 10.0.1 We have jobs that run in the windows scheduler.Just recently we started g

RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Tony Gravagno
Wendy Smoak Wendy.Smoak-at-asu.edu |U2UG| wrote: > My point was that "for free" often isn't. If you can buy > a packaged solution for a few thousand dollars, and not > have to maintain and support it, [as long as it does what > you need it to,] it's probably a better deal. > > I like working with

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Tony Gravagno
Glen B webmaster-at-all-spec.com wrote: > http://mvdevcentral.com If you find this site down from time to time lately it's because construction is being done in the area around the server and it's made phone/network connectivity erratic. Please try again later. Glen is generously providing MV De

Re: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Vance wrote: "'CLEAR-FILE DATA VOC' is exactly the reason it should be behind some kind of encryption, or even better yet (DOS /c 'FORMAT C: | y') or (SH -c 'rm -r'). I did'nt mean to give anything other than a clear cut example, but the example is like giving a hacker a back door to the comma

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Tony wrote: " Please try again later. Glen is generously providing MV Dev Central and PickSource with his own personal network, server, and cash." But I wanted a pony!! Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Tony: "I have no objection to free exchange of information, but in forums like this we should be able to expect some base level of competence in the subject matter. " --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] ot: Color laser printer question (quality of print)

2005-02-15 Thread George Gallen
After much digging,I found that Konica is only good if used on a windows system, and with the drivers supplied. It is not PCL or Postscript compatible, so custom coding is not an option. Looks like the HP wins out. George >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROT

[U2] Mutual Favor

2005-02-15 Thread Key Ally
All, I need someone I can interview for Database Trends. The goal is to publish a success story (so the mutual part sound be obvious). The ideal candidate is an end user (programmer, analyst, executive, or visionary) or VAR/Consultant who works very closely with end users. Contact me at [

RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
"Tony: "I have no objection to free exchange of information, but in forums like this we should be able to expect some base level of competence in the subject matter. "" And Tony the 'subject matter' of this forum is U2. Not how to make it talk to the internet. That's still a black box to some of

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Tony Gravagno
FFT2001-at-aol.com |U2UG| wrote: > But I was just reading that Apache DOES have support for > .asp "... since V2.0 ..." Haven't tried it yet though. > Will And ASP.NET with Mono - One code set for all platforms... Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Glen B
> I'm not saying with that example you should leave it the way I posted it, > where access is global. In fact I agree with you. The user and pwd should be > verified on a user basis for something so open as the example. But what I do > say, is that I do not recommend allowing http access to this sc

RE: [U2] Uv Error

2005-02-15 Thread Adrian Matthews
What are you using to do the backup? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Cooper, Rudy Sent: Tue 15/02/2005 21:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Uv Error Hello, Does anyone know what can cause the following error ? 1009: Program "S$WEB.CM.CREA

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Glen B
Tony, Thanks for the note. MV Dev Central is back up, and I actually have a land-line now. Actually.. Steve Kostecke is hosting picksource.com. I can't run 2 boxen on 1 DSL line. He has been running it for several years now and even brought forth a new/used 1U Intel server when his other box

RE: [U2] UV to Web interface

2005-02-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The example is just a way to get started. Okay, in my excitement that someone was posting an ASP example, I didn't look all that closely at it. http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SimpleASP Perhaps a 'safer' example is in order. Instead of showing how to execute a

[U2] FW: [UD] 6.0PE on SuSE 9.1?

2005-02-15 Thread Kevin King
This is a repost. I did not see it come through the list earlier. --- I have an zip of udt 6.0 PE that I'm trying to install on SuSE 9.1 w/ glibc 2.3.3.97. Installation goes off without a hitch, but when I try to start udt, the following message is displayed: ../udt: relocation error: ../u

[U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread gerry-u2ug
does anyone know how to access the Universe PE dowload - has it disappeared completely ? if it does still exist - what is the version and does it yet include UO.NET ? thanks Gerry --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Marc Harbeson
I just assume at this point that IBM is a bunch of incompetent fools, who can not attain schedule no matter how much the client base demands it. I see NO excuse for the time lapse in this availability of PE other than lack of IBM to follow thru on their commitment to have this ready in Q1 of 2005

Re: [U2] Looking to buy: Lead Generation software

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Pretty specific niche. I have a client who needs software that will track marketing to various customers with fields like: Last Contact Date, Contact Status, Last Mailed Date, Customer Since, Do not Contact, Quote Generated... Anybody have anything like that? They are calling it "Lead Generat

[U2] Sessions getting logged out in bulk.

2005-02-15 Thread Lettau, Jeff
We are having an issue with users getting logged off the system. It appears to only happen when more then one person is entering a sales order or similar transaction. I'm unable to re-produce it as a single user. When one of the people ends out of the order to save it, the system will logoff mul

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread FFT2001
Marc Harbeson wrote: "To summarize my message to IBM: CRAP, OR GET OFF THE POT!!! QUIT TELLING US IT WILL BE READY NEXT MONTH!" To quote Willie Wonka "Open your mouth a little wider when you speak". But on a sidenote, IF some hypothetical person were to still have a download of PE could they

Re: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Allen Egerton
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:52:05 -0500, you wrote: >Marc Harbeson wrote: "To summarize my message to IBM: CRAP, OR GET OFF THE >POT!!! QUIT TELLING US IT WILL BE READY NEXT MONTH!" > >To quote Willie Wonka "Open your mouth a little wider when you speak". But on >a sidenote, IF some hypothetical p

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Bruce Nichol
Goo'day, HeHe. At 20:24 15/02/05 -0500, you wrote: IBM's inability to deliver development tools ON TIME makes myself wander Obviously a typo, but I can't help myself.(sorry!) We "wandered" too.to a different MV... -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Viru

Re: [U2] Sessions getting logged out in bulk.

2005-02-15 Thread Bruce Nichol
Goo'day, Jeffery Has UD got an "AUTOLOGOUT" that could be interfering? At 20:44 15/02/05 -0500, you wrote: We are having an issue with users getting logged off the system. It appears to only happen when more then one person is entering a sales order or similar transaction. I'm unable to re-pr

RE: [U2] Sessions getting logged out in bulk.

2005-02-15 Thread David Jordan
It could be something silly like record locks not being released. Check LIST.READU The other area could be a temporary workfile that is set up and only one person can use it at a time creating a fatal. In debugging some people set a como file on and don't remove it going live and you have a massi

RE: [U2] Sessions getting logged out in bulk.

2005-02-15 Thread Lettau, Jeff
disabled it. The logging out can happen in just a few minutes. No where near any timeout setting length even if it was turned on. Trigger notifications are also turned off. Just the users and thier programs on ud60 Good guess. Jeffrey Lettau ERP Systems Manager polkaudio ___

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Marc Harbeson
:-) I was so mad. I had just sent the email to IBM asking them where PE was just a few days ago and got put off again... till march. This crap is beyond silly... I can download all kinds of PE versions of Oracle Have I lit a big enough fire yet? Where's the gas!?!? LOL

RE: [U2] Sessions getting logged out in bulk.

2005-02-15 Thread Marc Harbeson
Jeff, Are you running backup exec? Anything else funky on your server? Virus software? Are there any messages at the server, popup boxes, errors, warnings, event log entries that look funky? Have you upsized or bumped your udt parms in confprod.exe? CPU / RAM do anything funky when the mass log

RE: [U2] Sessions getting logged out in bulk.

2005-02-15 Thread Marc Harbeson
also, anything funky on the file security? (at the os level) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Jordan Sent: Tue 2/15/2005 10:23 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Cc: Subject: RE: [U2] Sessions getting logge

Re: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Key Ally
Marc, IBM has committed to putting the PE version back up. I'm sure it is neither malice or incompetence, it's just the downside of being a huge, multi-national. Sometimes the road from start to end gets tangled in internal rules. - Chuck Marc Harbeson wrote: :-) I was so mad. I had

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
No, it wouldn't be legal to redistribute them in whole or in part. Regards, LeRoy F. Dreyfuss Product Manager IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases IBM Information Management Software Tel: 303-672-1254 Fax: 303-294-4832 Mobile: 720-341-4317 Tie-line: 770-1254 Ext

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only half over. I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest features we ha

Re: [U2] FW: [UD] 6.0PE on SuSE 9.1?

2005-02-15 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
Kevin, This happens from time to time with Linux. This not only happens with U2, but other software products as well, especially with some JREs. The kernel you are using has not been tested within U2 as yet. This has happened with RedHat 9.0 as well, and RedHat did document a workaround in their r

RE: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Larry Hiscock
>> Sometimes the road from start to end gets tangled in internal rules. I think that's a typo ... It should read "...tangled in INFERNAL rules" ;-) Larry Hiscock Western Computer Services -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Key Ally Sent: T

Re: [U2] uv pe

2005-02-15 Thread Craig Bennett
Leroy, > They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret the > time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their > arrival as soon as they are ready. would it be possible to leave the older versions up? That way if someone quickly want to test something on a