I'm pretty sure COMMAND.EDITOR is unsupported and undocumented with this
release. It also doesn't work as expected. You'd be better off
"rolling-your-own".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Hutchings
Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2005 5:06 AM
> yes, we have been using that for years in universe. My question was
> more about the Unidata extension and what it brings?
Sorry - I haven't ued the other alternative, so I can't comment on the
difference.
Jeff Butera, Ph.D.
Administrative Systems
Hampshire College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
413-559-55
jbutera,
yes, we have been using that for years in universe. My question was
more about the Unidata extension and what it brings?
thanks
Tuesday, August 2, 2005, 11:30:26 AM, you wrote:
>> The intercall definition ic_opensession is defined for opening a
>> session for a connection to U2 .. the
I'm not sure about your architecture, but just to open some
possibilities... I used CF years ago connect into a back end application
using CFHTTP queries rather than ODBC. If you're already exposing U2
business rules as a Web Service then using CF to generate the UI becomes a
no brainer. If not,
We recently upgraded to UV10 and discovered that COMMAND.EDITOR has been
included. We used this long ago on Prime Information but now we cannot
locate manuals for some of its subcommands.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2
I got my SATA drives on a sale at Fry's (www.outpost.com) after rebate they
were only $60 each for 160GB Western Digital drives. I had to have my
neighbor go with me, because there was a limit of one, but he didn't mind.
:)
So *really* cheap and very fast. A great combination, imho, especially
s
Scott:
You're correct, of course...I don't know what I was thinking. An example is
even in the D3 help. The only caveat is the 1st value of each attribute is
selected.
Thanks for the correction. :-)
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I was going to stay out of this one...
But MTBF is drive dependent. WD Raptors (a 10,000 RPM, 4.5ms seek time
"enterprise" drive not really meant for the desktop but often used
there) is rated at 1.2M hours, pretty much in line with all of the SCSI
drives. Seagate Cheetahs, the self proclaimed "hi
Kind of an open ended question here, I have a few issues I'm curious
about particularly in regards to jdbc issues, but presumably there
aren't many CF users here so I'd rather not clog up the list. If anyone
has any general experience with the two, and willing to answer a couple
of vague questi
This totally depends on the chipset manufacturer. A $50 Adaptec SATA card
isn't going to burn a hole in the case. Our Opteron
file-server box is running a 320GB Barracuda RAID 5 on a 64-bit 3ware
controller. It smokes every Adaptec SCSI RAID I have on site
with ~500MB/sec read throughput and ne
Another good way to do this is to use the xls file extension for your csv
file. Use the Windows start command to launch the file. Excel will recognize
it as CSV and load it. You don't need the path to Excel. You can even embed
formulas into the csv file, for example: =sum(a2:a30)
To open the sprea
> The intercall definition ic_opensession is defined for opening a
> session for a connection to U2 .. there is also a ic_unidata_session
> and a ic_universe_session.
>
> The only difference I can see between the 3 is that ic_unidata_session
> has a 7th parameter 'Unidata_Server'. Otherwise they a
No, SATA is closer to IDE than SCSI.
Google for scsi versus sata, or scsi vs sata
http://www.infotech.com/ITA/Issues/20050426/Articles/Cut%20Through%20the%20SAS%20vs,-d-,%20SATA%20Debate.aspx
Might be enlightening.
SCSI is still more reliable (greater MTBF), but more expensive (often, much
mor
I switched to SATA not long ago. Incredible performance
Here's the funny part: you have to set your ROM to boot from SCSI! Didn't
say that anywhere in the doc's but there was no boot option for SATA on my
ASUS P5P800 so on a whim, and in desperation, I tried booting from SCSI and
BINGO!
So
The intercall definition ic_opensession is defined for opening a
session for a connection to U2 .. there is also a ic_unidata_session
and a ic_universe_session.
The only difference I can see between the 3 is that ic_unidata_session
has a 7th parameter 'Unidata_Server'. Otherwise they all appear t
Bill:
[snip]
D3 doesn't allow a SELECT to create a READNEXT list from an array so
REMOVE is all D3 can use.
[/snip]
Are you saying that...
SELECT DYN.ARRAY TO MYLIST
LOOP
READNEXT THING FROM MYLIST ELSE EXIT
REPEAT
...does not work in D3?
I think you are mistaken. My experience is that it wo
Thanks. The WRITEBLK worked perfectly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Claus Derlien
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:28 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Extra character
Each WRITESEQ will put a linefeed character in yo
Drew is probably correct (CR or LF). I send all my print jobs directly
to my printers using IP address and Port - I have to get rid of the
trailing CHAR(032) in the print job. Using a Linux command I can
accomplish this. "tr -d '\032'"
You can use "od -c myfile.txt" to take a look at what characte
Each WRITESEQ will put a linefeed character in your file if you are on a *nix
system
if you are on a winslow system it will be a carriage return + line feed.
you will have to use WRITEBLK instead of WRITESEQ, then you will get the
desired effect!
best regards from Denmark
claus derlien
> ---
> I am having a problem of universe (or linux) adding an extra character
when I
> write a file out. I have tried creating a file two different ways, using
> WRITESEQ and WRITE to a type 19 file.
<...snip...>
It's probably a trailing linefeed. If you are writing binary data rather
than text you m
Marc,
It is most likely a carriage return or newline character at the end of
each line (don't recall which one it is.)
HTH
Drew
Caminiti, Marc wrote:
U2 Gang
I am having a problem of universe (or linux) adding an extra character when I
write a file out. I have tried creating a file two di
U2 Gang
I am having a problem of universe (or linux) adding an extra character when I
write a file out. I have tried creating a file two different ways, using
WRITESEQ and WRITE to a type 19 file.
Here is the code...
WRITE DEPOSIT.REQUEST ON SWITCH.FILE,'nashbar.deposit.4'
or
OP
Well, for raw speed the kludgy i-type index method is faster, however, for
reliability and the ability to know when the trigger was fired (before/after,
update/insert/delete) you will probably need to use the file trigger mechanism.
As someone raised in an issue recently, triggers run in a transact
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately. Please note that there is no guarantee tha
first of all, i can't give definitive information only information about our
experience with the two different kind of i/o subsystems.
We have two identical servers cpu/os but on the test server we have SATA drives
in a no raid configuration
on the production server we have SCSI in raid 1+0 conf
25 matches
Mail list logo
