RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms

And SUCK if one side happens to go down you need to resync (massive amounts of) data I believe Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage Better by Design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny Sent: Wednesday, 24 October

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms

Baker, How live and active is this bi-directional transfer likely to be? Do you need to consider the possibility of data collisions (ie: will someone change a record in your UV database that could also be changed on the other end) OR are the discrete changes somewhat atomic transactions,

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non

I'd recommend MQSeries too, it is tried and tested technology - it works and works well. It has APIs for C, C++ and Java too. As Craig has pointed out, there is support in U2 BASIC from 10.x up for MQSeries AMI API (a subset of the full MQ API). MQSeries guarantees delivery, can offer

RE: [U2] curious EQUATE issue - SOLVED Just want to know if anyone understands WHY?

Bill, So what you are saying is that it is bad usage of the equate statement even though it can be done. I agree and the '=' is used more often for this type of equation. However, this program was created 15 years ago (long before I started here) and had been working fine until the code was

Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms

Sockets are just the pipe you push/pull things through. One of the features they bring to the table is that you get to (yes, I actually said that) design your own protocol for using them reliably or pick one of the already available protocols. FTP, HTTP, RCP, and telnet (and pretty much

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV dbms

Ross, Yes, there is a real-world application to the question, at least one where I may try to 'sell' the solution after the theory is worked out. 3 Different systems play with the same live Inventory of products: a UniVerse based OLTP, a MS SQL db based web-order portal, and a Warehouse Control

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV dbms

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:20 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV dbms Ross, Yes, there

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV dbms

Glen, snip You always get the good ones, doncha? What does the warehouse control system use as a database? How many different O/S are we looking at here? The first idea that comes to mind is transactional queuing and inspection. A FIFO updating situation will not work, since you have logic that

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms [AD}

As promised here is Robert Houben's input to your question Baker!!! :) For anyone who doesn't know me, I was the lead designer and developer of the PK Harmony product which we demoed at PC Labs at the Spectrum show in 1986 (over 20 years ago!) I've been involved in data communications since

RE: [U2] extended ascii characters and TOXML {Unclassified}

Stuart, Can you tell us when IBM in their wisdom have decided to add a UTF8 encoding tag in the XML header? I think it was some time between 10.0.15 and 10.1.18, but not sure when. It is, as you can see from the second message below, causing us grief in our BizTalk 2006 upgrade. We are looking

[U2] Raid 0+1 versus Raid 10 1+0

Hi All, I have just read a slide from the U2 University sessions whereby it states... RAID 0+1 is absolutely the fastest implementation possible for disk drives tInternal and External Disk Drives -Raid 0+1, striping and mirroring tWhen a mirrored disk drive is not committed to a WRITE, it is

RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms [AD}

Thank you Robert and Janet. Overly kind of you Robert to take the time to distill some insights into this reply. You give more consideration to the overhead of data Transformation and make an almost convincing argument to do it on the dedicated target, assumedly something relational/non-MV.

Re: [U2] Raid 0+1 versus Raid 10 1+0

phil walker wrote: Hi All, I have just read a slide from the U2 University sessions whereby it states... RAID 0+1 is absolutely the fastest implementation possible for disk drives tInternal and External Disk Drives -Raid 0+1, striping and mirroring tWhen a mirrored disk drive is not

[U2] Unable to Create A Pipe

Insight on this run-time error would be appreciated... Unable to create a pipe.[EEXIST] File exists We are running UniVerse v10 on HP-Ux --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] and PDF

Troy: Well then, don't you think it's about time to completely reengineer your solution? :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Buss, Troy (Logitek Systems) Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 5:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

RE: [U2] and PDF

Bill, Fyi.. We use pcl2pdf32 from visual software in the uk on windows server 2003 and UV 10.0.15: http://www.visual.co.uk/ However, I notice they will *start* to support hp-gl/2 in the next release: http://www.visual.co.uk/pcl2pdfwhatsnew.asp Our forms are all PCL and their solution has

RE: [U2] extended ascii characters and TOXML

Hi Mike, sorry, I'm not sure which UV release exactly contained the change. However, we use BizTalk 2004 2006 and as far as I know haven't had or heard of any issues with having an XML encoding attribute (utf-8, iso... or otherwise) with BT6 and I wouldn't expect any. MS seem to be fairly