So does this mean that all mv.net and designbais customers also should have
connection pooling licences as well - after all they are multiplexing to
some extent ?
Do bluefinity and designbais have a statement on this ?
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-U
On 25/09/2009 09:51, "Brian Leach" wrote:
> My beef is quite simply with the price of pooled connections. With the cost
> of the underlying licence, you are talking around 3,000 GBP plus AMC per
> connection, which means 10 shares costs around twice the amount you can buy
> SQL Server Enterpris
George
Thanks, seems I was misquoted or the price has fallen (it was a while ago).
At around 1700 GBP (with underlying licence) that's more reasonable.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of George
Hi Charles
The text regarding connection pooling was inserted into the licence
agreement when RedBack was first added, and originally that was the target
of the change in the licence agreement: any multiplexing or connection
concentrating was banned unless you had webshares. This of course meant t
IMO still far too expensive - I have recently done a project on sql server
because it would have been too expensive to use unidata with conn pooling on
the back end - not a situation I want to be in really !
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-b
It depends whether we are talking WebDE/RedBack or U2 connection pooling.
If WebDE there is the underlying license but if it is a pure U2 connection
pooling license for uniobjects or a home grown solution then 1207 is the
price.
So in other words 1207 for pure connection pooling and 1441 for a R
That is not quite right - it does not cope with 5 users at any one time - it
only copes with 1 user at any one time, in the course of a second that may
well end up being 5 individual users.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.
And this is the part about the WDE move to connection pooling that worries
us (pricing wise) -- we have clients that have 5-10 accounts -- some REALLY
low volume, like sales demo, and internal staff use -- yet each one will
require at least one connection pool. Pricey. As it is now, if they have 1
John Hester wrote:
We use IHS (IBM's version of Apache) and WebSphere AppServer along with
UOJ to connect to UV. Each user-initiated UOJ subroutine call to UV
establishes a new logged-in session that consumes a license while the
subroutine runs. When the data is returned to UV, the session lo
David:
I must be misunderstanding your comments. You state that SQL Server,
for instance, would charge a per connection license for a large web
site. I don't believe this is true.
SQL Server pricing depends on the licensing model one needs. Generally
you get a "per processor" or a "per se
Sorry, resend because it was hard to tell what I had written as it put the
legal stuff up at the top.
from the post I was replying to (so it doesn't do it again):
...
SQL Server pricing depends on the licensing model one needs. Generally
you get a "per processor" or a "per server" plus end
Robert F. Porter, MCSE, CCNA, ZCE
Lead Sr. Programmer / Analyst
Laboratory Information Services
Ochsner Health System
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other appl
Hi Bill
I raised that there are 2 options, per user or per processor. For a web
site you would select the per processor model. I was generalizing licenses
and was trying to point out that licensing is complex for all platforms and
costs are not always as cheap as they may seem. There are gotcha
I am out of the office until 12/31/2009.
The U2 business was purchased by Rocket Software, effective October 1.
This email has not been forwarded so please resend to my new email
adddress.
My new email address is kdr...@rs.com.
My new phone number is 720-475-8025
Please update your records.
14 matches
Mail list logo
