Re: [U2] WORKING WITH PROMPTS

Jim, You don't say, so I'm going to assume UniVerse here. Yes, there are two ways you can do this in BASIC. EXECUTE creates a new workspace, so you need to either change to using PERFORM (which doesn't) or pass the prompt answers into that workspace. Here are the two syntaxes. Given the

[U2] [UD] Running out of LCTs

Hello all. I'm running a batch job which after a number of iterations fails with a 'no more LCTs' error. I'm able to track the memory usage with sms -L process number and I can see the number in the Memory Info section moving slowly up from 2 or 3 up to 31 as the batch job runs. I know

Re: [U2] [UD] Running out of LCTs

'no more lcts' means udtconfig NUSERS is too small to handle all of the udt processes you want to spawn concurrently on a system. Default is 25% license - but may be insufficient if you run a lot of phantoms. Based on your sms -L review, it sounds more like you are getting 'no more entries in

Re: [U2] [UD] Running out of LCTs

Interesting. I've added GARBAGECOLLECT as advised and memory usage seems stable now. fwiw, this is on a machine with just two sessions (out of 3) active, no phantoms or other connections. All settings are as default for a ud 7.1.2 install - at least, I've not changed them since installing. The

[U2] fnuxi problem

Hi all, I am on a UniVerse client site trying to move an application with a vast number of dynamic files, some indexed, from UV 10.1.18 on a Sun Solaris box to UV 10.3.6 on a Red Hat Linux Intel box. The data files were moved with tar and byte order conversion was done using find . -type f

[U2] XML format question

I'm importing some XML, and a question came up with the following: I'm writing a small xml extraction program to setup a dynamic array, what is the difference between putting a field inside the label vs putting the field between the tags of the label? Aren't they both a subset of the

Re: [U2] XML format question

George, either way will work. The by product of making xml attribute centric (fields inside the label) is that it produces smaller files (about half the size of element centric). If your producing small files that may be read by an admin, then go with element centric as it is easier to read.

Re: [U2] XML format question

I'm not producing the file, I'm reading the file and was trying to figure out why some of the field were inside the result label, and others were between the result /result tags. I was trying to setup the structure of the dynamic array I am putting the data into. -Original

Re: [U2] XML format question

George So to paraphrase, when do you use attributes to hold data and when do you elements.. The problem is, there is no clear answer to this, and everyone who designs XML schema has to grapple with this question. The only simple answer is that if a value could legitimately have an attribute

Re: [U2] XML format question

Ahh the old attribute/element discussion - much to be said on this in various quarters, you may want to google on xml elements or attributes to gain some insight. If space is of concern then attributes take less room, but then again if space is of concern don't do xml, do json/csv/edi etc

Re: [U2] XML format question

If space is of concern then attributes take less room, but then again if space is of concern don't do xml, do json/csv/edi etc excellent advice. norm On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com wrote: Ahh the old attribute/element discussion - much to be said on this in

Re: [U2] fnuxi problem

In the past when I had done fnuxi I always used the following syntax: find . -name * -exec fnuxi {} \; This takes and tries to fnuxi all files in the current directory and below. If the file is not a U2 file it will not harm anything. -Dan -Original Message- From:

Re: [U2] XML format question

since space concerns do not fall into place for my part, the xml has already been done, I had no control over that. I'm just trying to interpret the data correctly. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf

Re: [U2] XML format question

It makes no difference for your extraction, there are no hard/fast rules as to why they have done it that way, if it is an attribute it will only be single valued, whereas if it is an element, it may be multivalued. A dtd or xsd will define if it is a multiple occurring element. -Original

Re: [U2] XML format question

Looking at the schema didn't shed any extra light either! -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:29 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] XML format

Re: [U2] fnuxi problem

Hi Dan, Sadly, this doesn't help as it will try to process the DATA.30 files that cause the hang. Thanks anyway. Martin Phillips Ladybridge Systems Ltd 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton, NN4 6DB +44-(0)1604-709200 - Original Message - From: Dan Goble

Re: [U2] XML format question

I like to think of elements are as file folders. You can create a specific file folder for every tiny piece of data and make locating those pieces easy in a DOM based on node name. SAX, on the other hand, fires off events for every node and attribute it encounters at all levels. So, your

Re: [U2] fnuxi problem

Martin The obvious choice would be uvbackup and uvrestore, but failing that you're going to have to do some scripting. How about: Run a find for all the VOC files - that will get you all the account directories. Redirect that to file. Edit it to remove all the /VOC so you're left with the

Re: [U2] XML format question

George: If I understand your question, all you are trying to do is figure out how to get the value of the element attributes in an XML file you are receiving. If this is what you need to accomplish, the following is an example of a portion of an extract file that shows the format to do this.

Re: [U2] fnuxi problem

The following worked for me when we did a UV migration from unix to linux about 7 years ago: fnuxi * I wrote a script that descended into the directory for each account and executed the prior command at that level. We have a mix of dynamic and standard hashed files, and the command worked for

Re: [U2] fnuxi problem

Hi. What about doing it at UniVerse level? You can get the list of files with SELECTFL, saving the list and execute a FORMAT.CONV for each file. Regards -- Augusto 2010/5/13 John Hester jhes...@momtex.com The following worked for me when we did a UV migration from unix to linux about 7

Re: [U2] fnuxi problem

In message 9ea3c4a038d14a2fa37a2ea3c801a...@lbs8, Martin Phillips martinphill...@ladybridge.com writes Hi all, A follow up to my own query. This site uses entirely dynamic files. The recommended way to do fnuxi recursively over a whole application is to use find as in my previous email.

Re: [U2] Printing images

On Wed, 12 May 2010, Don Robinson wrote: Harold, If you or someone else can pay for it, Print Wizard will do the job plus a lot more. Given the amount of time someone might need to take to build one PCL file, Print Wizard will almost certainly save money. Entry price is $99 for Personal

Re: [U2] XML format question

XML, as suggested, is a flexible container but I think that the pundits suggest that you use elements for data and attributes for metadata which is used to refine or modify the default behaviour of an element. For example: Money currency=aud12.99/Money Then if you needed to store or convert