When a remote PC, asks the Windows server to open a Telnet session, Windows
assigns a Process ID to that request. While the telnet session is open,that
Process ID will appear in the Windows Task Manager.
Is there a way to tell, WHO ask for that Telnet session to be opened? That is,
the name
netstat -f
Wjhonson wrote:
When a remote PC, asks the Windows server to open a Telnet session, Windows
assigns a Process ID to that request. While the telnet session is open,that
Process ID will appear in the Windows Task Manager.
Is there a way to tell, WHO ask for that Telnet session to be
With the proper security settings you could also see it in the windows event
log. Not sure about how to query the Universe telnet server, in UniData
there are a number of commands that are actually executables that you can
run from a command prompt - like listuser.
hth
Colin
-Original Message
There is no -f option on netstat
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
netstat -f
Wjhonson wrote:
> When a remote PC, asks the Windows server to open a Telnet session, Windows
assigns a Process ID to tha
On Windows 7, netstat -help shows this:
-fDisplays Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDN) for foreign
addresses.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: September-06-
and -o to let you link it with the pid.
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Sep 2012, at 21:04, Robert Houben wrote:
> On Windows 7, netstat -help shows this:
> -fDisplays Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDN) for foreign
>addresses.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-user
yes there is:
NETSTAT [-a] [-b] [-e] [-f] [-n] [-o] [-p proto] [-r] [-s] [-t] [interval]
-aDisplays all connections and listening ports.
-bDisplays the executable involved in creating each
connection or
listening port. In some cases well-known executab
Oh yeah, and your welcome, asshat.
Wjhonson wrote:
There is no -f option on netstat
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
netstat -f
Wjhonson wrote:
When a remote PC, asks the Windows server to open
Not client.
Server.
The command that will associate each requesting* client to its *server*
process, on the *server*
Not on the client.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
netstat -f
Wjhonson wrote:
>
ONLY for the client side
NOT for the server side :)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Houben
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 2:48 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
On Windows 7, netstat -help shows this:
-fDisplays Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDN) for foreign
It's possible the server is not Windows 7
-Original Message-
From: Wjhonson
To: u2-users
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
ONLY for the client side
NOT for the server side :)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Houben
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, S
Uh for a solution that ignored what I wanted?
Yeah... uh.. thanks for not answering my question.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
Oh yeah, and your welcome, asshat.
Wjhonson wrote:
> There is no -f opt
Really kills you to not have the last word doesn't it.
Sort of like a petulant 12 year old.
Wjhonson wrote:
Uh for a solution that ignored what I wanted?
Yeah... uh.. thanks for not answering my question.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012
And apparently all the telnet sessions from the server side, are all children
hanging off the tl_service.exe process.
That's why the netstat PID's don't line up
*Slaps forehead* geez louise
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.
Sitting back and just watching it happen this time.
Have you guys realized yet that he's doing 'that thing' again?
T
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
That thing where I ask what I perceive to be a simple question, and Tony gets
all bent out of shape by it.
What the exact issue here Tony?
This is a REAL problem, I'm REALLY having :)
So what's your deal
-Original Message-
From: Tony Gravagno <3xk547...@sneakemail.com>
To: u2-users
Sen
When someone calls me an asshat, I tend to respond.
Did you think somehow you'd get away with that sort of personal abuse?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 4:11 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
Really kills you to not have the last word do
As a professional who works (a lot) with MultiValued systems (many of them U2),
I really like the technical content that I run into on here, and contribute
when I think I have something useful to say.
I get really put out with the personal attacks, but choose generally not to
respond. I really
I've discovered, for useful content on this thread, that using SYSTEM(42) I can
return my IP address, and then, on the SERVER (doing DOS from Universe TCl
command line) I can then use the tracert command to associate that IP address
back to my LOCAL (client!!!) PC who is doing the telnet.
Will,
Please take this constructively: I'm not really sure what an asshat is, but
frequently you seem to fit the bill.
A forum where unpleasant remarks are frequently in use takes seriousness
away from this useful tool we all have, and might discourage what I believe
we all want, that being more p
So you chose to respond to me the victim, instead of Jeff the perpetrator.
Very curious isn't that? Would that be a typical reaction you think, to blame
the victim for someone abusing them?
-Original Message-
From: Marc A Hilbert
To: 'U2 Users List'
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 6:09 pm
Su
Ignoring the rabble, I've discovered curiously that you can have telnet
sessions started on the server, but then apparently abandoned. They will
appear in the DOS tasklist command (on the server), but yet not appear in the
DOS netstat command (on the server).
I suppose this means they are not
Or maybe there isn't
No f below Jeff
Displays protocol statistics and current TCP/IP network connections.
NETSTAT [-a] [-b] [-e] [-n] [-o] [-p proto] [-r] [-s] [-t] [-v] [interval]
-aDisplays all connections and listening ports.
-bDisplays the executable involved in c
Here are a number of ways to link a telnet client into UV back to its
respective hostname. There's some redundancy here as not all commands
work everywhere.
OK, so as I understand the challenge, you got the inbound IP using
System(42) (which of course should reveal the answer to life, the
universe
I've glad you're in a productive mood, because Ping using your one packet, is
significantly faster than tracert which is what I *was* using to connect the IP
number to the client hostname.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Gravagno <3xk547...@sneakemail.com>
To: u2-users
Sent: Thu, Sep
A newbie stumped me: Why are "Q-Pointers" "Q" pointers ?
The "Q" lingo comes from the dawning days of Pick.
Why was the letter "Q" chosen?
"A"ttribute makes sense.
"S"ynonym makes sense.
"PQ" for Prestored Query makes sense. PR for Proc would have been
better.
D3 User Guide j
Charles,
My guess is Quick as in a quick link to another account.
Don Robinson
From: Charles Stevenson
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 10:19 PM
Subject: [U2] Etymology of "Q-Pointer"
A newbie stumped me: Why are "Q-Pointers" "Q" pointers ?
The "Q" lingo comes from
I find this thread interesting (now that we have the name calling and such
out of the way, I am taking no sides just saying) having said that I am
still trying to fully understand what you are trying to accomplish. I
understand (I think) that you have a system (running universe on windows)
and you
Great input, Tony.
But be warned WJ, if your client PCs are external to your network, then
Private Addressing and NAT may make this whole exercise nugatory.
For example, if your host network / server is on your 10.x.y.z (or
192.168.a.b) and your remote client is on his 10.x.y.y (or 192.168.a.c),
t
29 matches
Mail list logo
