-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
Guys,
I have narrowed the problem down further. It appears that Win2K3 SPx is
not the issue, as when I rdp
to fail through the
firewall/juniper networks software.
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powell
Sent: Monday, 30 July 2007 11:45 a.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
Phil,
What happens
Windows 2000 and connect via AccuTerm then
this works and System(51) gives the information pertaining to box A.
However when I try and connect via AccuTerm directly from box A, then it
does not. A firewall issue, or a Windows 2003 Server issue.
Has anyone got U2 Device Licensing running under Windows
Server issue.
Has anyone got U2 Device Licensing running under Windows 2003 Server or
through a firewall?
I suspect the U2GetMachId() function is doing something which is getting
blocked by something What though??
Any ideas anyone???
Cheers,
Phil.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users
via AccuTerm then
this works and System(51) gives the information pertaining to box A.
However when I try and connect via AccuTerm directly from box A, then it
does not. A firewall issue, or a Windows 2003 Server issue.
Has anyone got U2 Device Licensing running under Windows 2003 Server
via AccuTerm then
this works and System(51) gives the information pertaining to box A.
However when I try and connect via AccuTerm directly from box A, then it
does not. A firewall issue, or a Windows 2003 Server issue.
Has anyone got U2 Device Licensing running under Windows 2003 Server
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: John Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
BOUNCE NOTICE:
Your recent post to our lists bounced because either you are not a
member or because you are not signed up using the e-mail address which
you used to post. To subscribe or resubscribe please visit
Phil
That's one for Accuterm - Accuterm supports connectivity to U2 rather than
vice-versa.
Try using Dynamic Connect - if that works then the problem is with the
Accuterm software, possibly with the DL software version included in this
case.
If DC does not work on a straight
June 2007 3:46 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
Good call Bill. Mine is 3.0.3049.0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:33 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
I'm running 10.2.0 on windows.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:50 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
Sorry for the error on my part. It took me a while
Does it work with ssh?
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 3:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Device Licensing
As others have posted:
Device Licensing works for both U2 databases as long as you have
As others have posted:
Device Licensing works for both U2 databases as long as you have a license
which is one of:
* Workgroup
* Enterprise
* Server with device licensing (a recent offering)
In order that this will work you need a TELNET client that supports Device
Licensing, and as there have
I believe Accuterm is one of the 3rd party products you mentioned. At
least is does have a U2 device licensing option in its configuration.
However we cannot get device licensing to work using Accuterm, with SSH
protocol and RHEL 4.0, Universe 10.2.4 enterprise version?
Is Accuterm still
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 3:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Device Licensing
As others have posted:
Device Licensing works for both U2 databases as long as you have a license
which is one of:
* Workgroup
* Enterprise
* Server with device
David,
What version of the uvlicn.dll are you running?
Cheers
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward
Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2007 11:46 a.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
I finally
There is no such file on my system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:59 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
David,
What version of the uvlicn.dll are you
David:
You might try ...\Atwin\u2licn.dll. Mine's dated 10/28/04.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ward
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:17 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
Good call Bill. Mine is 3.0.3049.0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:33 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Device Licensing
David:
You might try ...\Atwin\u2licn.dll
Is this normal behaviour ?
I have device licencing switched on, on a 4 user udt system on Linux. I have
3 telnet sessions from different hosts, and i have two vb processes on a
web server connected using UO. I now want to run an ASP.NET app that
connectes from the same web server via UO.NET and
version that addresses that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: 27 Jul 2006 14:28
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] device licensing question ...
Is this normal behaviour ?
I have device licencing switched
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Paterson
Sent: 27 July 2006 14:42
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] device licensing question ...
I know there used to be a problem with how device licencing
identified sessions - but that was a while back
their existing
uvCase/UniObjects app.
Regards
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Paterson
Sent: 27 July 2006 14:42
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] device licensing question ...
I know
: Re: [U2] device licensing question ...
I am on udt 7.1 on redhat Enterprise ES 4 EM64T, so only a year old.
UODOTNET.DLL version is 2.1.0.7137
uniobjects.dll version is 3.1.6.7137
lictool - where is that, it does not seem to be in my ud71/bin
directory. If the ip is reversed as you say
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] device licensing question ...
I am on udt 7.1 on redhat Enterprise ES 4 EM64T, so only a year old.
UODOTNET.DLL version is 2.1.0.7137
uniobjects.dll version is 3.1.6.7137
lictool - where is that, it does not seem to be in my
ud71/bin directory
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: 27 Jul 2006 16:23
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] device licensing question ...
I am on udt 7.1 on redhat Enterprise ES 4 EM64T, so only a year old.
UODOTNET.DLL version is 2.1.0.7137
25 matches
Mail list logo
