RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-19 Thread Bill Haskett
udt pts/3 192.168.1.101 22:42:30 Jul 18 2007 Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:07 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: Tony

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-19 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
, 2007 1:07 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: Tony, How long is a long time now? I have quite a bit of history with the product and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3 (and I haven't time to confirm if it is v3), which

[U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Gravagno
Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported in a near-future release. It's preferable to use managed components all the way through, so UO.NET is the preferred pipe. T LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote:

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Symeon Breen
mv.NET can also connect back to the host via telnet - which always makes me grin, but I am sure it has its uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: 18 July 2007 08:46 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] RE

Re: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Don Kibbey
The current system I work on (not U2 based) uses a vb6 front end that communicates via custom tcp/ip libraries to a backend component running on a windows server within the MKS (unix) environment calling into informix 4gl code that has been compiled against a translation library to work with sql

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Bill Haskett
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:11 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO mv.NET can also connect back to the host via telnet - which always makes me grin, but I am sure it has its uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Symeon Breen
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:11 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO mv.NET can also connect back to the host via telnet - which always makes me grin, but I am sure it has its uses. -Original Message

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Bill Haskett
: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:53 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO I am sure it is useful for many things. BTW - UO.NET is only a 208kb download, you don't need the whole clients CD. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread LeRoy Dreyfuss
Gravagno Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:46 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO Just to clarify - mv.NET can use standard UO but has also been enabled to use UO.NET for a long time now, and standard UO might not even be supported in a near-future release. It's

RE: [U2] RE: mv.NET and UO

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Gravagno
LeRoy Dreyfuss wrote: Tony, How long is a long time now? I have quite a bit of history with the product and if BF enabled it for UO.NET, it would only be from v3 (and I haven't time to confirm if it is v3), which is a fairly new version. Long time = over a year now. Current release is