RE: [U2] Source code question {Unclassified}

2005-06-06 Thread HENDERSON MIKE, MR
Steve, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Steven M Wagner > Sent: Sunday, 5 June 2005 14:40 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] Source code question > > The answer is a big fat maybe

Memo: RE: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-06 Thread asvin . dattani
>I'd also wonder about port-specific usage. I believe I > worked on a Unix > box a while back where they mapped the ports so that every > time a person logged > in they got the same port number. Don't ask me exactly how > they did this. HP-UX has a facility called DDFA. It is meant to be use

RE: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-06 Thread Brian Leach
>Someone already mentioned the issue of TIME() which also > impacts things > like SLEEP and RQM and NAP. This is tuneable in the UniVerse config. As long as you stick to working in whole seconds - which always used to be the default - this should be fine. >I'd also wonder about port-spe

Re: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-05 Thread Mark Baldridge
UniVerse compatibility can be determined by knowing the machine class. If the machine classification is the same then the object code will be compatible. Unless the actual run machine has changed, then object code should remain upwardly compatible. The object code gets compile-time information b

Re: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-05 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 6/4/2005 3:31:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If I compile on 2 different machines and 2 different OS ex. HP-UX and AIX > but on the same Universe versions the same source code (any basic code) did > they work the same ? Maybe there are some system

[U2] Source code question

2005-06-05 Thread Susan Joslyn
lieve they have clear-cut reasons for or against it! Susan Joslyn SJ+ Systems Associates, Inc. -- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:19:29 -0400 From: Moderator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [U2] Source code question POSTED ON BEHALF A NON-MEMBER Hello guru's I

RE: [U2] Source code question oops fnixi shoud be fnuxi

2005-06-05 Thread John Jenkins
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: 05 June 2005 10:37 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Source code question As long as you avoid O/S specific functions (executing SH commands specific to one Unix flavour

RE: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-05 Thread David Jordan
. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moderator Sent: Sunday, 5 June 2005 8:19 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Source code question POSTED ON BEHALF A NON-MEMBER Hello guru's I've got question ab

RE: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-05 Thread John Jenkins
As long as you avoid O/S specific functions (executing SH commands specific to one Unix flavour for example) you should be fine. UniVerse BASIC is an interpretive runtime environment and BASIC "object code" is in fact metacode not O/S executable. The only items that throw up differences are mach

Re: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-04 Thread Steven M Wagner
The answer is a big fat maybe. It will depend on how different the OS's are and how tied into the OS the UV application is. I know that UV on HP-UX stored internal time as an integer and UV on WinNT includes the milliseconds. So a change from HP-UX to NT could be a major change. Different v

RE: [U2] Source code question

2005-06-04 Thread Larry Friedlander
--- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Source code question

2005-06-04 Thread Moderator
POSTED ON BEHALF A NON-MEMBER Hello guru's I've got question about source code. If I compile on 2 different machines and 2 different OS ex. HP-UX and AIX but on the same Universe versions the same source code (any basic code) did they work the same ? Maybe there are some system specific basic