] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 4:08 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Buy a copy of FAST, and I'm sure Jeff will forgive you ;-)
Anthony Dzikiewicz wrote:
> Sorry Dan, I guess your name sticks with me from being
ehalf Of Dan Fitzgerald
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 4:26 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
I'm flattered, but those articles were by Jeff Fitzgerald, no relation.
"Our greatest duty in this life is to help others. And please, if you
c
not very 'political' of you
DSig
David Tod Sigafoos
SigsSolutions, Inc.
> Original Message
> Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
> From: "Dan Fitzgerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, March 07, 2005 1:26 pm
>
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
I'm flattered, but those articles were by Jeff Fitzgerald, no relation.
"Our greatest duty in this life is to help others. And please, if you
can't
help them, could you at least not hurt them?" - H.H. the Dalai Lama
&q
lation, the first thing to be
bought & sold are the legislators" - P.J. O'Rourke
Dan Fitzgerald
From: "Anthony Dzikiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To:
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:0
Thanks to all those that replied to my post. It appears that the
performance problem that I experience on write intensive operations is
not a Universe issue. It turns out that it is a problem (probably a
driver) for the disk array (Clariion CX300) or the SCSI card (Qlogic
QlA2312).
It was very
2005 1:32 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Oops! Chuck's right about the output of analyze.shm, but not about
dynamic
files ;) [In case there's any question, Chuck is in my personal
pantheon, up
there with Aung San Suu Kyi, Nelson Mandela, and..
ld
From: "Stevenson, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To:
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:41:38 -0500
-Original Message-
I may soon become a fan of static files if this kind of thing kee
-Original Message-
I may soon become a fan of static files if this kind of thing keeps up.
Here is the output that you are referring to.
Dynamic Files:
Slot # Inode Device Ref Count Htype Split Merge Curmod Basemod
Largerec Filesp Selects Nextsplit
01900545 59425
1. T30FILE.
If your MFILES was set to the default, 12, then chances are T30FILE also
needs to be tweaked, given that you have so many dynamic files. I
assume you compared the old DG uvconfig to the new Linux one and can
account for the differences.
--
My MFILES increase was an 'educated guess'.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevenson,
Charles
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:21 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
1. T30FILE.
If your MFILES was set to the default, 12, then
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevenson,
Charles
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:21 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
1. T30FILE.
If your MFILES was set to the default, 12, then
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:03 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Just to see... try an analyze.shm -d, and see how many dynamic files you
have ( My personal opinion is that anything above "0" is
probably
too many, with some spe
1. T30FILE.
If your MFILES was set to the default, 12, then chances are T30FILE also
needs to be tweaked, given that you have so many dynamic files. I
assume you compared the old DG uvconfig to the new Linux one and can
account for the differences.
2. DISABLE-, BUILD.INDEX.
Try disabling indexes
t hurt them?" - H.H. the Dalai Lama
"When buying & selling are controlled by legislation, the first thing to be
bought & sold are the legislators" - P.J. O'Rourke
Dan Fitzgerald
From: "Anthony Dzikiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: u2-users@listser
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill H.
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 12:07 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Anthony:
Can you comment out the "WRITE" and replace with a &q
t as an issue.
Hope this helps a little.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
> Dzikiewicz
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 8:21 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Perf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Richardson
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 9:51 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Moving/Editing a parameter in uvconfig is only a small step in
ary 14, 2005 11:00 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
>Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 10:00 AM
>To:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 10:00 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
does it happen at the same time of day?
The problem occurs anytime
I
would raise the issue. -Rod
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Dzikiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 8:32 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
If I display 'top' in Linux while this is going on,
am instead.
George
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
>Dzikiewicz
>Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 9:32 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
>
>
>If
From: "Anthony Dzikiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
> Richardson
> Sent: Mon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Richardson
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 8:31 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
In addition to what Trevor mentions, you may want to have a look
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor Ockenden
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 8:55 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
Just a suggestion!
Whenever I have encountered this type of problem there
7:11 PM
Subject: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
> I am experiencing some strange behavior on our Linux machine. We have
been
> running on this machine since October. I am just getting into some file
> cleanup, year end rolls, etc.. What is happening is that the machine
comes
11:12 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe/Linux Performance Issue
I am experiencing some strange behavior on our Linux machine. We have
been
running on this machine since October. I am just getting into some file
cleanup, year end rolls, etc.. What is happening is that the
I am experiencing some strange behavior on our Linux machine. We have been
running on this machine since October. I am just getting into some file
cleanup, year end rolls, etc.. What is happening is that the machine comes
down to a crawl.
We were on DG/UX and this kind of thing never happened o
28 matches
Mail list logo
