lf Of Donald Kibbey
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:23 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
I think if I were supporting that many users, I'd want to insure the system
had the most reliable code base I could. Does not mean you do every
upgrade, but it do
I think if I were supporting that many users, I'd want to insure the system had
the most reliable code base I could. Does not mean you do every upgrade, but
it does requrie an effort to stay fairly current. With that many users, you
probably have a test environment where upgrades could be eval
Sent: 02 February 2005 23:06
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Upgrade to the most current release for your platform and you'll find
that is no longer a problem.
Regards,
LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relat
That's the one I was looking for! Thanks very much Stuart.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell,
Stewart
Sent: 02 February 2005 22:17
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Mike,
T
From: "Bill H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Great! Now if only the runtime engine would tell me a little more about the
"Variable Not Assigned a Value, Zero Used" (and other such) error(s); li
I guess it does depend on the type of include it is but you could put the
includes near the bottom of the program and use a gosub to reference them if
they are needed at the top.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Farrant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:58 A
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Microdata dropped the ball on the INCLUDE 20 years ago which offers this
solution that I use for all of my MCD clients today. Here's the source
snippet
***
* PROGRAM NAME
* MARK JOHNSON 020205
***
GOSUB GET.INCLUDE
Microdata dropped the ball on the INCLUDE 20 years ago which offers this
solution that I use for all of my MCD clients today. Here's the source
snippet
***
* PROGRAM NAME
* MARK JOHNSON 020205
***
GOSUB GET.INCLUDES
OPEN "CUSTOMER" ETC
GET.INCLUDES:*
INCLUDE THING1
INCLUDE THING2
is everyone aware that RAID will now display the
values of individual elements in a dynamic array
:: D.CHART<10>/
STRING: T r L=114
`34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124
5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000'
:: D.CHART<10,1>/
STRING: T r L=10 `3432103559
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
stserver.u2ug.org
Subject
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
02/02/2005 03:17
PM
Pl
Mike,
The line numbers get messed up in RAID if you have an inline comment after
the include.
This buggers the line numbers
$INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER ;*In line comment
and this doesn't
$INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER
Get rid of the in line comment and the line numbers will be correct.
i think 10+
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notifie
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maresh, Mel
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:20 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
>
>
> Talking of debuggers,
>
> is everyone aware that RAID will now displ
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brenda Price
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:19 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
What version of Universe allows this?
Brenda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maresh,
What version of Universe allows this?
Brenda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maresh, Mel
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:20 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Talking of debuggers,
is everyone
Mike,
I look forward to hearing your solution!! I never took time to specifically
diagnose this, but when I have like 10 includes, when in the debugger the line
being shown could be actually 10 lines off from the actual line being run at
that point. Not really consistent tho, as when I have onl
Talking of debuggers,
is everyone aware that RAID will now display the values of individual elements
in a dynamic array
:: D.CHART<10>/
STRING: T r L=114 `34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124
5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000'
:: D.CHART<10,1>/
STRING
17 matches
Mail list logo
