RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-21 Thread David Jordan
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Monday, 21 March 2005 11:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2 I've used a 2 user licensed (NOT pe) UniVerse 10.1 on Gentoo, Redhat and SuSE 8.2 during my testing. As others have said, I've found it works just fine

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-21 Thread Don Kibbey
I've used a 2 user licensed (NOT pe) UniVerse 10.1 on Gentoo, Redhat and SuSE 8.2 during my testing. As others have said, I've found it works just fine with just about any linux distro out there. I'm also betting that IBM would support it on most any of the mainstream distros as most of them are

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-21 Thread Claus Derlien
Hi, I have tried a commercial edition of universe on suse 8.x - 9.2 I know that IBM certifies UniVerse to a certain product aka RedHat, but what they do state in the availability matrix is the demands on the version numbers for some of the libraries, and as long as you have recent versions og g

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
And I did not mean to imply you were advocating that, as I (hopefully) clarified in my reply to David. I'm still having quivers about last week's threads about trying to cut corners by using PE in an "inquiry-only", "depends on the definition of the word 'commercial'", Clintonian-like rationali

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 12:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2 Using the PE version commercially is a violation of the license, ie. against the law.

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Matthews
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Clifton Oliver Sent: Sun 20/03/2005 18:10 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2 Using the PE version commercially is a violation of the license, ie. against the law. IBM might choose to have quite a bit to do with it--via their Legal

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Lance Jahnke
Don't forget the file size limitations in the PE version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Sun Mar 20 13:11:42 2005 Subject: RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2 Heh - Clif - You wandered a bit off the question by

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread David Wolverton
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 12:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2 Using the PE version commercially is a violation of the license, ie. against the law. IBM might choose to have qui

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
Using the PE version commercially is a violation of the license, ie. against the law. IBM might choose to have quite a bit to do with it--via their Legal Department. -- Regards, Clif ~~~ W. Clifton Oliver, CCP CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES Tel: +1 619 460 5

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Matthews
Universe (PE version) works on just about every distro of Linux I've tried seemingly without problems. However I would never dream of using it commercially unless it was on a certified platform. Just imagine if it looks ok in testing and then starts having major problems under "Live" load. IBM wou

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-19 Thread Clifton Oliver
Your client doesn't care about not having support?? Marc Hilbert wrote: Good afternoon to all. My client wishes to use Suse Linux 9.2. IBM does not officially support this (perhaps will be certified during the second half of this year). Can anybody out there attest one way or another as to if there