How does that work? As far as I know it limits the transmit vs airos, or am i
missing something. They going after ddwrt and the other third party's next, or
is this a show?
Sincerely,
Christian Palecek, COO
Grizzly Broadband, LLC
Cybernet1 | 406.363.2183 (office)
christ...@cybernet1.com
I usually have a "nonat" address list for any of my may rule in case the need
arises, and the need often arises.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Christian Palecek
<christ...@cybernet1.com> Date: 1/10/18 5:33 PM (GMT-07:
Have you tried specifying in the nat rule to never nat to the aircontrol's
dst-ip?
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Kevin Melson Date:
1/10/18 11:25 AM (GMT-07:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group
wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs
Unless it's the gateway
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2017 7:10 PM, "Christian Palecek" <christ...@cybernet1.com> wrote:
An ip conflict would only
You should check the processes in the shell jic.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
p { margin: 0; } Original message From: Mike Hammett
Date: 11/23/16 3:10 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Ubiquiti
Users Group Subject: Re:
How are you running the bandwidth tests? Have you tried iperf between radios
to single out the rf? Is there any variation in speed when changing the
channels? i've seen this with a ub when there is an mtu crunch, otherwise i
would jjst blame the units.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy
It'd be worth it to see what the b5 would do with such a short shot.
I'm a believer after finally deploying one.
I am shooting through the top of a pine on a 7 mile link. I can still get 500+
through with the right channel selections.
Signal level is -64, so the obstruction may not be such