Re: [Ubnt_users] Custom Firmware

would not devices booting up to a specific IP(on My-10.x.x.x) cause an IP issue with other devices on same IP? I don't see how this could be a good idea. Maybe someone could explain how this is good. Also, clients who didn't return radios could turn them on and create havoc for same reason a

[Ubnt_users] click-to-manage airGateway

What's the point of the click-to-manage feature if your going to run into access denied? Go through all the trouble to install these and the later versions of firmware seem to deny access now. What a PITA! -- J ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_us

Re: [Ubnt_users] Telescoping Pole

Great idea, any models affordable? with battery and lift capable to fly a nanostation with an airGateway? Jan V On 07/23/2016 03:23 PM, Blair Davis wrote: > get a drone! > > > -- > > > On 7/23/2016 6:14 PM, Shawn Burgei wrote: >> Any good place to buy telescoping poles to use for site surveys?

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ants in radios!

I'm told by some old-timers that using a pet flea collar (cut into junks) is useful in repelling insects from electronic gear. Jan V On 07/30/2016 01:47 PM, Clay Stewart wrote: Raccoons eat snakes. Coyotes eat Raccoons. Jaguars eat Coyotes... and well... humans. On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 2:21

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi Video

Is there a paper on this? Jan V On 08/08/2016 12:25 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote: > Anyone know if dhcp option 43 works for unifi video cameras? I use it for > unifi AP and works great. Need to manage the CAMs over layer 3 and dont want > to have to log into each CAM and configure. > > > > Shaw

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi Video

t; Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment > 866-680-8433 Toll Free > 480-287-9960 Fax > http://www.video-direct.tv > >> On Aug 8, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: >> >> Is there a paper on this? >> >> Jan V >> >>>

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi Video

I found this, does it help? http://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Wireless/Mikrotik-DHCP-option-43-How-to/m-p/259954#M13526 Jan V On 08/08/2016 02:02 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: > Is there a document on this topic? I don't understand your reference to > option 43, the answer about everythin

Re: [Ubnt_users] kudos to ubnt - rma

I think I'll not bother with RMA as ubnt requires too much BS to jump through. Had an airrouter HP fail same day installed and description of failure was not adequate enough for them ( burned-up, too hot to touch, not working). I'm a one man show and don't have hours of free time to satisfy t

Re: [Ubnt_users] kudos to ubnt - rma

se. Provides a local inventory for us. Do not favor Amazon approach. You pay a small premium but the benefits are great in supporting a local supply chain that is willing to work with you. /Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID/ Jan-OOLLC wrote: I think I'll not bother with RMA

Re: [Ubnt_users] kudos to ubnt - rma

ll look into this and have it improved. Thanks, Ben On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Jan-OOLLC mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: Our local supply chain is 2 days away, even when paying for next day it still takes 2. We don't use Amazon except for emergencies

Re: [Ubnt_users] kudos to ubnt - rma

t happening, please send to me off-list and will look into this and have it improved. Thanks,

Re: [Ubnt_users] ubnt nanobeam 5ac 19

Don't believe you're pointing them at each other. I'm using them for much further, just fine 10 miles. Jan V On 09/01/2016 03:38 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote: Got these initially for connections under a mile getting -46 to -50 on 1/2 mile Got an outlier, one connection 1.5 miles. Barely abl

Re: [Ubnt_users] ubnt nanobeam 5ac 19

ssage - From: "Jan-OOLLC" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Subject: [Ubnt_users] ubnt nanobeam 5ac 19 Date: Thu, Sep 1, 2016 6:47 PM Don't believe you're pointing them at each other. I'm using them for much further, just fine 10 miles. Jan V On 09/01/2016 03:3

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unexpected reboot warning in UBNT radios

yes, I've seen it, thought it might be related to moving the POE after install, or a power outage and after an update Jan V On 09/01/2016 07:57 PM, RickG wrote: How about 5.6.9? On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Mitch > wrote: I am seeing it on 5.6.6 and

[Ubnt_users] slow speeds issue

I'm having a slow speed test issue (along with unusually slow speed overall). I replaced the 900Mhz CPE with a 2.4 point to a different tower and the speed is about the same, crappy! I don't detect any wifi on or near same channels. Is there other types of noise sources that can't be detecte

Re: [Ubnt_users] slow speeds issue

. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jan-OOLLC <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: I'm having a slow speed test issue (along with unusually slow speed overall). I replaced the 900

Re: [Ubnt_users] slow speeds issue

you have the JRE installed. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 9, 2016 6:17 PM, "Jan-OOLLC" mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

seeing something too similar on nanobeam m2 13 cpe not ap Jan V On 11/02/2016 07:38 AM, Roy wrote: > > Here is a possible scenario: > > The AP decided to change channels for DFS reasons and picked a new > frequency that the STA is not licensed for. This can occur if the UNII > rules are set diff

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

What do you mean the WAN port goes to sleep? Partial traffic? Pulse once in awhile? Just real slow? Can you elaborate a little? I've got _3 recent installs_ of Nanobeams m2 13 doing almost exactly the same thing. WAN port appears to be asleep 1MBps/130MBps shown on main tab. Login takes f

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

interference) seeing the ap. *From:* Jan-OOLLC *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 12:41 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5 What do you mean the WAN port goes to sleep? Partial traffic? Pulse once in awhile? Just real slow? Can you elaborate

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

I know this is asking a lot, but would it be possible for the amplifi literature to be more vague? Jan V On 11/07/2016 08:49 PM, Matt Baer via Ubnt_users wrote: +1 for in-law approved On Nov 7, 2016 10:15 PM, "Ben Moore via Ubnt_users" mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> wrote: Funny how w

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

Moore via Ubnt_users wrote: We can always make it more vague... ;) What questions do you have on it? On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Jan-OOLLC <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: I know this is asking a lot, but would it be possible for the amplifi literature to be more v

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air Grid M2 to Rocket M2 lousy connection

Replaced the AirGrids with an NSM2, works great! what??? Hey, there is no best channel, all are good. AirView, just as useless as ever Jan V On 11/10/2016 10:35 AM, ty...@wigi.us wrote: Id suggest running a spectrum analyzer on the AP side find the cleanest channel. Normally with lopsid

[Ubnt_users] AirGatway with parental controls

Is there a firmware version that could provide homes with a means of keeping the teenagers offline at night? The powercord is not a good solution. I need something with multiple passwords or users and times when they are allowed online. -- Jan V _

[Ubnt_users] DNSmasq failed to start

I'm seeing this on a NSM2 and am curious as to what the hell? Is this an internal issue or an external device? -- Jan V ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] DHCP request too often

AirGateway LR is sending out DHCP way too often, 4-5 minutes. Is there a cause for this? -- Jan Van Kort Manager: Oregon Online, LLC PO Box 71, Coquille, OR 97423 Office: 541-435-0509, Cell: 541-404-7001 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@

[Ubnt_users] Log not present on AirGateway

Where is the log? It is enabled on the system tab. FW 1.7 latest version. Same model same FW shows Log on Main tab but not present on another, what's going on? Is this a reload of firmware required? -- Jan V ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_us

Re: [Ubnt_users] DHCP request too often

; --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric On Nov 29, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Jan-OOLLC <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: AirGateway LR is sending out DHC

Re: [Ubnt_users] Log not present on AirGateway

FYI-- haven't seen a response yet to this issue. Log option is missing from Main tab even though it is enabled on System tab. Is this a defective unit? Jan V On 11/29/2016 03:01 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: > Where is the log? It is enabled on the system tab. FW 1.7 latest > version.

[Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP

Is there a technique to install a replacement rocket and have the CPEs transfer over with minimal pain such as drive to every home and manually connect? I don't want to have to drive 100 miles multiple times to get at each CPE with appointments -- Jan __

Re: [Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP

6-6389 On Jan 28, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Kees H <mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com>> wrote: just make sure your stations are not locked to the AP by mac address -Original Message- From: Jan-OOLLC Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 9:38 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: [Ubnt_u

Re: [Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP

Update, trying to balance the Rx dbm's at the AP first, by decreasing transmit power at the CPE. Noticed that one of the trouble CPEs was connecting to another tower with same name SSID even the the signal was 10 dbm weaker. So I figured if all the CPEs were configured to lock to the AP mac,

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC Gen2 question

Kind of a mute point when there are warranty coverage issues that have not been resolved. Why should I buy more junk and truck rolls? How can I get the broken trust back? Jan V On 03/23/2017 09:47 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: Are there any hard numbers to compare it with the Prism radios? Rory

[Ubnt_users] 4-way keying handshake timeout

I'm getting this error, what's the remedy? -- Jan V ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

What is the safest best release to use as of right now? Jan V On 05/08/2017 05:33 AM, Clay Stewart wrote: v6.0.4 is out... have not switch yet here On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Scott Lambert > wrote: Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Jan-OOLLC mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> Date: 5/8/17 11:22 AM (GMT-05:00) To: ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0 What is the safest best release

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

with 6.0.4 for me, but it was infrequent enough in 6.0.3 that I can't confidently say it's fixed in 6.0.4. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:59 AM Jan-OOLLC <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: was the report of an 18dBm drop in RX an error with v6.0.3? Jan V On

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

gazines/May/2016/> On May 8, 2017, at 12:10 PM, James Wilson mailto:ja...@ridgecomms.com>> wrote: Odd, UBNT called 6.0.4 beta when they announced it a non-beta forum... We've installed 6.

Re: [Ubnt_users] WISPAs wonky forum DB (was Firmware V6.0)

at 12:10 PM, James Wilson mailto:ja...@ridgecomms.com>> wrote: Odd, UBNT called 6.0.4 beta when they announced it a non-beta forum... We've installed 6.0.4 in a few APs and STAs in both bri

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

PowerBeamM5. I have a few airGridM2 also. I have stability issues. What firmware will improve things? Jan V On 05/08/2017 02:44 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: Whether you are on a mailing list or not, please move your topic to it's own new topic category and stop hijacking this thread. Yo

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

wart wrote: We are not experiencing any issue yet with 6.0.3, but will be trying 6.0.4 this week. 6.0 has disconnect issues. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Jan-OOLLC mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: What is the safest best release to use as of right now? Jan V On 05/

[Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power

Relocating tower, yes obvious solution, is there a legal way to prevent power from being turned off in the meantime? (FYI--a foreclosure that went backwards and had been one of the first tower locations in the area more than 10 years, so we believed the customer) -- Jan V __

Re: [Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power

own meter installed? Power should be like $10-20 a month for a handful of devices. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Jan-OOLLC <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: Relocating tower, y

Re: [Ubnt_users] new owner turning off power

37 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Jan-OOLLC mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: Relocating tower, yes obvious solution, is there a legal way to prevent power from being turned off in the meantime? (FYI--a foreclosure that

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT 6.0.6 WARNING

How does something like this get out of the factory? Jan V On 07/07/2017 08:05 AM, RickG wrote: Yup! Happened to me. Fortunately I was bench testing ;) On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:59 AM, > wrote: Everyone Heads up if you upgrade to 6.0.6 it will NOT al

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

Do we know for sure it's a legal brick? Why would a vendor break their own hardware by killing it and prevent another vendor firmware from installing on it? This sounds more like a malware issue to me. Sure am glad i don't automatically update. Can I get a confirmation on this question? J

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

Still don't know what breaks with 6.06. Jan V On 07/10/2017 09:34 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: Do we know for sure it's a legal brick? Why would a vendor break their own hardware by killing it and prevent another vendor firmware from installing on it? This sounds more like a malware i

[Ubnt_users] 2nd request Fwd: wifi cell phone content blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings

Forwarded Message Subject: wifi cell phone content blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 08:42:47 -0700 From: Jan-OOLLC To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' Are the 2 related? I'm getting user complaints over cell-pho

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2nd request Fwd: wifi cell phone content blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings

some such router and see it issue remains. Tommy A. Digitex.com <http://Digitex.com> 817.558.6230 V 817.558.1204 F On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Jan-OOLLC mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: Forwarded Message

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2nd request Fwd: wifi cell phone content blocked? Access Point generates insecure warnings

cert installed though? Thanks, On 7/17/2017 12:03 PM, RickG wrote: Nevermind, just read your last message. Just looking for the common link... On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:01 PM, RickG <mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com>> wrote: Only one user? On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Jan

Re: [Ubnt_users] changing channels on me?

I've keep finding APs on the wrong channel or in auto mode. I'm wanting to know if this can be caused by firmware updates. Simple question. janv On 07/26/2017 02:43 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: A STA by default will scan all frequencies if that's what you're asking. All frequencies available to

Re: [Ubnt_users] changing channels on me?

I don't use any channels with a (DFS) after it. 37 shows on an AP but does not seem to work with a STA. I typically use 147, 156 and 164 and do not use auto mode (never) for my APs. I'm noticing every once in a while APs set to channels I would not have put them on or they're in auto-mode an

Re: [Ubnt_users] changing channels on me?

mode. If you are not using DFS then I have no idea what would cause that. -------- *From: *"Jan-OOLLC" *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" *Sent: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:47:32 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] chan

[Ubnt_users] solar powered towers

looking for a source to acquire mppt charge controller w/IP addressable LAN port for panel/battery monitoring -- Jan V ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal

I had 5.6.2 in the NSM2. Went to 6.4, saw problem and reverted back to 5.6.2 I don't think this was just a reading, it seems to effect actual signal including packet-loss. What firmware going backwards, is last firmware that doesn't do this and has no serious bugs? Jan V On 08/02/2017 05:

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal

Is there a posted summary of firmware versions vs bugs so us users can choose which poison is least harmful? Jan V On 08/03/2017 09:31 AM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: I had 5.6.2 in the NSM2. Went to 6.4, saw problem and reverted back to 5.6.2 I don't think this was just a reading, it see

Re: [Ubnt_users] pbe-m5-400 what's with the different power levels?

How do you tell from the buyer's order list which devices are old vs newer? ubnt support helped me figure out the eirp thing that was causing differing power-levels, don't understand why I hadn't encountered this before Jan V On 08/17/2017 10:26 PM, Mimbres Communications wrote: I've got t

[Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

Anyone ever dealt with this? -- Jan V ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2017 3:21 PM, "Jan-OOLLC" <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: Anyone ever dealt with this? -- Jan V ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_use

Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

/2017 02:35 PM, Adair Winter wrote: Discovery tool? On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Jan-OOLLC <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: ubnt specific. What can be done to locate duplicate IP addresses. Are there any applications that do this? Jan V On 08/18/2017

Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

:02 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs er,... ip addresses On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Jan-OOLLC mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote: discovery tool (ubnt) did not find it, D

[Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source

Have a client that is difficult to login to at times, service for them seems to quit.  Has good signal strength.  Have changed the radio to different models and frequencies and connected to different towers.  It's like some kind of barrier at random times is erected between house and tower.  Si

Re: [Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source

.net>> wrote: Could still be noise.  Canopy and AFx equipment won't show up in the noise figures. Rory -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] cameras 1000ft through a forest

I have to get cameras up and have a forest in the way.  Range is a little over 1000ft from house, need to live monitor the road and catch dumpers.  What radios, how to keep them powered and what cameras should I think about for first attempt? -- Jan V

Re: [Ubnt_users] cameras 1000ft through a forest

I have no details/requirements other than cheap, quick.  These bastards are dumping almost every night.  There are cedars, Myrtles, etc... in the way.  Should I think about running power 1000ft?  Is there a cheap way to get enough power to the cameras via POE? Jan V I have to get cameras up an

Re: [Ubnt_users] cameras 1000ft through a forest

This sounds like a solution.  Did you mean you powered a travel trailer or something else by name of nb19? Jan V On 01/26/2018 05:51 AM, David Hulsebus wrote: > > On 1/25/2018 2:54 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote: >> I have to get cameras up and have a forest in the way.  Range is a >>