-
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
&
from few customers that they cannot search
> Google.com, page not foound, for last couple days. When
> traceroute is ran from core router, Edgerouter Pro, that has
> been unchanged and in services for years, I get the error below:
>
>
>
> Any hel
-
Scott M Piehn
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:18 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x packet loss
Definitely through the wireless link? Not including the Ethernet?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct
We have about 1500 units on 6.0.4 and a bunch of 8.3.2. No complaints. It
will probably be late spring before we risk 6.1.x/8.4.x due to the possibility
of weather making it difficult to react to any problems which may pop up with
the new software.
The new software may be perfect. We just
We're not thinking about running it until others test for a while. The
biggest problem I've seen on Ubiquiti's forum is a bad memory leak if the unms
functionality is enabled. They will probably fix that soon.
On October 3, 2017 9:43:33 AM MDT, Randy Cosby wrote:
>Working very well for us. E
gt;> Aug 15 14:33:31 dropbear[2103]: Child connection from
>> :::192.168.11.1:39908
>>
>> Aug 15 14:33:31 dropbear[2103]: exit before auth: Exited normally
>>
>> Aug 15 14:34:01 dropbear[2117]: Child connection from
>> :::192.168.11.1:40110
>
Take a look at L-Comm. They have the cabinets you are looking for.
Sincerely,
Scott Lacko
Owner
We have moved, please note our new address is 5332 Hwy 70w in Eagle River.
Please note that I am in the field quite often and may not get your email until
the following business day
,
Scott Lacko
Owner
We have moved, please note our new address is 5332 Hwy 70w in Eagle River.
Please note that I am in the field quite often and may not get your email until
the following business day, for prompt assistance please contact the office at
715 479-1110.
<h
Jordan,
I updated both routers and it did resolve the issue. I had to send a set-inform
command but it is working. Thank you. You may want to pass this onto the Unifi
guys as we spent quite a few hours working with them on this one. Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Scott Lacko
Owner
We
d are
being thrown out. Would this be the same issue?
Sincerely,
Scott Lacko
Owner
We have moved, please note our new address is 5332 Hwy 70w in Eagle River.
Please note that I am in the field quite often and may not get your email
until the following business day, for prompt assis
27;t heard about it.
Scott
-- Original Message --
From: "Robert Andrews"
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group"
Sent: 8/1/2017 9:41:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] solar powered towers
Buy for the future. A little money spent now will prevent a LOT of
rework later. Nice thing abou
Is anyone aware of known issues with R5AC Prisms, first gen, talking to
nanobeams in a PtMP setup? We replaced 11 R5Ms with R5AC Prisms.
8.3 and 6.0.4
Some of the nanobeam users are now complaining of poor upload speeds.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevit
Please remove me as well
Scott
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Christian Hilliard
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 1:32 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0
Please remove me as well..
Thank you
Christian Hilliard
Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation to match the drop in
modulation? Just want to make sure the RSSI drop you've observed is not purely
cosmetic.
We are late adopters here, so no experience.
On May 7, 2017 4:57:42 PM CDT, Nick Bright wrote:
>v6.0 is said to have disassocia
Possibly. It really depends on the relative difference in throughput of the
feed to the link and the speed of the flow controlled rf link. 10 gbps feeding
a 10 mbps radio link can fill radio's buffer with a small video buffer refill
for half a second then have no traffic for 3 seconds. The av
Are you returning a session-timeout attribute from radius? That should tell
the access server to check with RADIUS again after they have been connected
that long. I am not sure that I am remembering the attribute name correctly.
We set it up years ago.
Disclaimer, I don't use radius for t
I did it a couple of times. The first time scared me when the web UI showed
only 3 ethernet interfaces. But you can create the other interfaces in the
CLI. Then it seemed to be 100%. The second time was with a newer edgeOS. The
interfaces were just greyed out that time. I went to the CLI
By flat network, do you mean one layer 2 network spanning multiple towers? If
so, it could be anywhere on the far end of the link.
Is there a Netonix at the far tower? If so, I would have expected that switch
to isolate a port over there, unless something just went off the rails in one
of t
It behaved itself after the firmware update. That may just be a coincidence.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
0
wlanRxErrRetries=0
wlanRxErrBmiss=0
wlanRxErrOther=0
latitude=0.00
longitude=0.00
cfgCrc=c170ae1d
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertfam.org
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_
With the client signals and noise figure posted, I would guess that these
sectors will run out of steam around 10-16 mbps.
The customers with 26mbps air rate can destroy total throughput when they
decide to use the Internet. Your ubnt speed tests to the better signal
clients may show 30 mbps.
lutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
>
>http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman
>Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
>
>> On Dec 6, 2016, at 5:06 PM, Scott Lambert
>wrote:
>>
>> did you change your mac's security setting to allow apps
did you change your mac's security setting to allow apps from anywhere for the
first run?
On December 6, 2016 4:03:47 PM CST, Justin Wilson wrote:
>Has anyone downloaded the UBNT Discovery tool for mac lately? I
>re-downloaded it on a new laptop, installed the recommended java, and
>the install
Maybe I'm missing something. The default lease time for the airOS DHCP server
is 10 minutes, or 600 seconds. DHCP clients often start trying to renew their
lease when 1/2 the lease time remains. That would be 5 minutes.
Some clients seem to have a minimum renewal interval. Those seem to r
to 5.6.9, sent in support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations
> are 130/130 on 20 MHz (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40
> MHz). The worst noise in the area is probably -87.
>
>
> I have no clue.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix
30, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Scott Lacko
wrote:
>
> We did quite a bit of testing on site and found when the RSSI was
> above 60db things worked as expected. But it feel off quickly below
> -60db. We actually had to double our AP count on one site to get the
> system to work to the
extras. Tech support logged into our server ( we host our own) and verified
all the settings. Supposedly they took it to engineering and what I got back
was
Snip
"Sean P (Ubiquiti Networks)
Oct 27, 06:10 PDT
Hi Scott,
I'll suggest you to upgrade firmware to v3.7.21 and then apply the c
We are see the same issue here. 2.4Ghz clients below -65db will hardly pass
traffic. 5Ghz is better. Client manufacturer does not seem to matter. I have
a case open with support. Their last suggestion is to upgrade firmware to
v3.7.21 and test again.
-Original Message-
From: ubnt_users-bou
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:47:25PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> How are people keeping AC2 server from filling the disk space? I can
> handle cleaning up the logs. It seems to be the statistics database
> tables which grow without bounds.
>
> I should have built the VM with
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 03:51:20PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> If it's ext3 you can just grow the disk/partition?
ad infinitum?
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Scott Lambert
> wrote:
>
> > How are people keeping AC2 server from filling the disk space? I can
> >
How are people keeping AC2 server from filling the disk space? I can
handle cleaning up the logs. It seems to be the statistics database
tables which grow without bounds.
I should have built the VM with more disk space, but I didn't.
--
Scott LambertK
probably a silly question:
With the MW-LX-SM-US, have you swapped tx/rx connectors at one end?
I like Faisel's suggestion of testing with a second RB2011 in place of the
FiberPoE just to prove out the cables and SFPs.
On September 13, 2016 7:43:11 AM CDT, Faisal Imtiaz
wrote:
>It is possibl
wn to not be flakey with the Tablo. Perhaps it's a USB
drive going to sleep type issue?
https://www.tablotv.com/blog/tablo-usb-hard-drive-specifications-suggestions/
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertfam.org
_
The issue is that over time the poles tend to twist slightly during the
course of the year.
We find that if we have a 2ft dish / 10 mile link we may have to go out
and adjust the link twice a year. Swaying has not been an issue but our
poles are not really high (40ft).
On 8/19/2016 10:34 AM,
ain. I have scheduled it to upgrade to 6.34.6 tonight.
On August 19, 2016 6:38:46 AM CDT, Sam Morris wrote:
>On 8/18/2016 2:41 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:55:29AM -0500, Sam Morris wrote:
>>> There is nothing in the event section of the AC2 server
y for a long time.
Did you recently change any firewall rules to block ICMP?
If ICMP is working, PathMTU discovery can work and connections can deal
with arbitrary MTU limits along the path. The TCP/IP stacks just lower
the MSS until they no longer receive ICMP packet too big respon
md5 key-id 0?
I've had issues with EdgeOS when it was configured for the correct md5 key, on
a different key-id. Usually in multi-vendor situations. Try setting up key-id
1 and 10.
On July 30, 2016 10:49:04 PM CDT, nath...@sswireless.net wrote:
>
>Good evening.
>
>
>
>We had this happen when
under 100 - Rates depend on 10 or 20 MHz.
Just starting our AC migration.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 10:26 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Aggregate Download Capacity Real TCP on
AirMax-MxRadios
We're looking
t; -65 or better so that the AP isn't struggling to resend packets to a CPE
> with a poor connection.
>
> Thank you for any help you can offer. I did search the knowledge base as
> well as the forums and didn't see a good answer. (There were some good
> posts on the AC a
I'm not an EdgeOS expert. I tried DHCP with multiple subnets on a normally
statically configured network during the MF worm fun in May. The GUI was worse
than useless. The CLI was almost as bad because it sorted the networks while
building the isc-dhcp config file. ISC-DHCPd seems to need t
Bad cable, ends, PoE, or interfaces, just not as bad as the others you've seen.
I've seen it with wet cable. It would stay at 100F until I bounced the
interface somehow. Then it ran 1G until it rained again. That went on until
it went to 10F once. Then it was enough of a pain to be worth th
r, whether onsite in your data
center or in the cloud to report alerts or provisioning information.
Scott Alerding
317-853-4913
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Peoples"
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group"
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 11:42:38 AM
Subject: R
Chuck - I think I removed him from the list.
Can you or Rick delete ja...@ori.net<mailto:ja...@ori.net> from all wispa lists?
Sincerely,
Scott LePere
On-Ramp Indiana, Inc.
859 Conner Street
Noblesville, IN 46060
317.774.2100
supp...@ori.net<mailto:supp...@ori.net>
Interne
That statement may be correct in general. I don't have enough of them in the
air to draw any conclusions.
But if your statement was about this link, your RM5 isn't seeing the same noise
as the R AC was dealing with due to the large difference in operating
frequency. Unless you actually test
.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8488 - Release Date: 10/31/14
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, I
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:34:11PM -0700, Mike Lyon wrote:
> Does the rocket m5 AC work in the new lower UNII band?
>
Not at this time.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertf
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:42:28AM -1000, Elton Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Scott Lambert
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:44:06PM -1000, Elton Wilson wrote:
> > > We have a 10mile link that sees about 150mb download at peak
> >
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:22:14PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:44:34PM -0700, Ben Moore wrote:
> > Hi Scott -
> >
> > Sriram and Salvador should have reached now.
> >
>
> Yes they took a look. I don't think it mis-behaved for t
48 matches
Mail list logo
