Which Intel, specifically? You may be able to fall back on the i810
driver which doesn't respond to the no monitor error.
On 02/02/2010 06:58 PM, Mike Coulombe wrote:
> According to windows it is intel.
> Mike.
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100202-1, 02/02/2010), Outbound message
> X-Antivirus-Statu
Mike
It goes crazy with both. OS X will boot without a monitor, but it runs
slow and anything that tries to initialize the video card won't work and
will crash. Ubuntu, naturally, will simply not start X at all.
This isn't specific to Ubuntu or even Linux, any system such as FreeBSD,
Opensolaris
Mike, do you know what video driver your system is trying to use? I've
found that some video drivers with certain video cards (usually
integraded GPUs) won't allow you to start X if a monitor isn't
connected. On a slightly related note, something similar happens if you
attempt to use a Macintos
Hi, I am still having a problem with lucid not getting to the login screen for
gnome if I don't have a monitor connected. It does let me login to the consul,
but I don't get the login sound for gnome. Any idea what could be causing this.
My monitor doesn't have to be on, but it does have to be c
Dear List,
In future, important need functions I think when accessible install is
selected for example with screenreader support:
1. Default, always working accessible login feature.
I wroted an e-mail, how can I do working this function my system and my
doed live cd with default Ubuntu settings
Hi Bill,
I think you have a framebuffer running on your system.
This results in a screen other than 80x25.
Try this cmd after login to a textconsole:
stty cols 80 rows 25
HTH.
Halim
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
