On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 17:36 +0100, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> It seems that we have a palette here:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Official?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=ubuntu-palette.png
>
If you look, you will quickly see that the palette on the wiki is _not_
adhered to in any respect. In
Hi,
Such review is very important at the begin of our cycle. Remember the
great dapper artwork review frank schoep did. We need such review. Can
you create such document ? You or someone else ?
Thanks.
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numéri
Am Donnerstag, den 23.11.2006, 19:18 +0300 schrieb Ivan Sagalaev:
> Hello!
>
> A Troy James Sobotka's recent email reminded me of an issue that I
> raised some time before Edgy's release:
>
> > In fact, last cycle, the emblems were changed based on
> > a single email.
>
> Feeling that I've fa
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:17 +, Who wrote:
> Can someone in the know clarify:
>
> * Is the art-team going to be making wallpaper, background, GDM, lsplash?
what about usplash?
cheers,
tonic
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/list
Hi,
Unlike at the beginning of last release, we have had no discussion of
what the team will be doing for Feisty, and what we need to do
differently from the last release.
Can someone in the know clarify:
* Is the art-team going to be making wallpaper, background, GDM, lsplash?
* If so - what ar
It seems that we have a palette here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Official?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=ubuntu-palette.png
BTW, where can I find informations on who's doing what, the state-of-the-artand
plans for the next release?
Thanks a lot,
Gianluca
2006/11/23, Troy James Sobotka <[E
Hello!
A Troy James Sobotka's recent email reminded me of an issue that I
raised some time before Edgy's release:
> In fact, last cycle, the emblems were changed based on
> a single email.
Feeling that I've failed to explain the issue properly last time (been
busy working as it happens :-) )
Are there plans for a gtk theme colour selector for 'normal users
(I.E. with a nice GUI) because if so then we can really drop silicon,
outdoors, etc...
Thoughts?
Something like this?
http://gnomedesktop.org/node/2811
Gianluca
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
On 11/22/06, Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
snip snip
>
> Apart from that, I'd like to drop the individual themes from
> ubuntu-artwork. gray-theme, industrialtango-theme, legacyhuman-theme,
> outdoors-theme, resilience-theme, silicon-theme have been part of
> Ubuntu'
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 12:07 +0100, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> Do you think that the idea of a flat macos-like set of icons for the
> panel would be accepted by the sabdfl? I can invest time to do them,
> but only if it's not an already lost battle.. BTW, what's _your_
> opinion about it?
>
Pers
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 07:10 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello Troy,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 21:19 -0800 schrieb Troy James Sobotka:
> > I believe we discussed this in Paris -- the problem you raised was a
> > technological migration issue. Is this still an issue?
>
> I'm not quite
Il giorno mer, 22/11/2006 alle 21.19 -0800, Troy James Sobotka ha
scritto:
> I am 100% for dumping the legacy themes. In fact, default artwork
> should probably only consist of the single elements for the default
> looks. Everything else should be repository based.
I agree.
Turi.
--
ubuntu-
2006/11/23, Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:15 +0100, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> Style and Coherency
As you can
imagine, the icons take a good deal of effort. Currently, the bulk of
the icons were contracted by sabdfl and built by the IconFactory. If
someone
13 matches
Mail list logo
