On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 14:18 -0400, Andrew wrote:
1. Define some guidelines for inclusion in the package. Possibly
something as simple as being proposed on this list, shared on the
wiki, ect... Essentially, not just a cool but random theme from
GNOME-Look, but something actually from _this_
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 14:18 -0400, Andrew wrote:
1. Define some guidelines for inclusion in the package. Possibly
something as simple as being proposed on this list, shared on the
wiki, ect... Essentially, not just a cool but random theme from
GNOME-Look, but
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:20 -0400, Saleel wrote:
Agreed with both your points. Number 4 I feel should be slightly later
than the official artwork deadline, in case some one is contributing to
both. Someone will have to write up a draft of what the decision making
process should look like,
В 17:54 +0200 на 30.03.2009 (пн), Thorsten Wilms написа:
This should ideally be fuelled by those who already succeeded in having
their themes included, as they know how it can work and how much time it
all takes. And Kenneth, of course ;)
I'll be glad to help ;)
Anton
--
ubuntu-art
On Saturday 28 March 2009 22:57:23 Andrew wrote:
2009/3/28 Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com:
It would have been nice to see some items land in community-themes but
that effort did not bear fruit. As you plan for Karmic that should be a
topic for discussion.
As the community-themes package
2009/3/29 Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com:
I went ahead and updated my personal branch of community-themes to
remove Dust and New Wave and add Impression. What about Kin, do we
still want it? Are there any other themes that should be added? Should
I ask for this to be uploaded?
Adding
Saleel wrote:
I know that Karmic is going to have 'designers fingerprints all over
it', is there an actual new palette of colors that we can start
referring to? Will the alpha/betas of Karmic have an alpha/beta
background? It is very difficult to start putting down ideas if I cant
think
Cory K. wrote:
Who says we'll be contributing to Karmic?
-Cory K.
The communities artwork should be in tune with whatever the grownups are
doing. It would be odd if we started/produced work on brown wallpapers
if the official gui is -for example- pink.
--Saleel
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
Saleel wrote:
Cory K. wrote:
Who says we'll be contributing to Karmic?
The communities artwork should be in tune with whatever the grownups are
doing.
Speak for yourself there kid. ;)
It would be odd if we started/produced work on brown wallpapers
if the official gui is -for
Cory K. wrote:
Why? Where is there anything saying that what we do has to be in line
with what they do? Who put that handcuff on us?
I have always thought that they should complement each other. When a
user chooses to install the community packages, he or she is looking for
artwork to
Saleel wrote:
Cory K. wrote:
Why? Where is there anything saying that what we do has to be in line
with what they do? Who put that handcuff on us?
I have always thought that they should complement each other.When a
user chooses to install the community packages, he or she is
Cory K. wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a
little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though we
on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;)
After consideration, you are right. So then the question becomes: Do we
On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote:
Cory K. wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a
little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though we
on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;)
After consideration,
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 16:29 + Kenneth Wimer wrote:
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:29:51 +0100
From: Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: 200903281729.51818.kw...@ubuntu.com
Content-Type: text/plain
On Saturday 28 March 2009 18:16:28 John Baer wrote:
Ken,
What is the desire for submissions that missed the cut? My thoughts are
to push them to gnome-look and its sibling sites. Although designed with
Ubuntu in mind they may add value to other open source projects. :)
Naturally, everything
2009/3/28 Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com:
It would have been nice to see some items land in community-themes but
that effort did not bear fruit. As you plan for Karmic that should be a
topic for discussion.
As the community-themes package is in universe we can still update it.
I'm not sure
2009/3/28 Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com
On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote:
Cory K. wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a
little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though
we
on this list are bound by any
17 matches
Mail list logo
