-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ken,
I have done some job on this almost completed. Give a try and tell me your
opinion.
cheers,
SzerencseFia
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After discussing the ubuntu-looks engine with a few developers we have
> decided
> to look into
I'm not talking about the theme.
But I noticed that some widgets from XUL are not drawn like gtk-widgets,
even if the devels do their best.
The widgets in firefox/thunderbird/prism/... are "emulated" gtk-widgets.
Please correct me if I'm wrong!
OOo:
AFAIK it's not handled like a "mormal" gtkMenuB
On 24/01/2008, Sebastian Billaudelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you sure?
> I'm playing arround with the 3.0a8 and it doesn't use a _real_ gtk theme...
> Afaik you can't use real gtk with XULRunner.
> E. g.: The menubar-items have the style from the menuitems and so on.
> Even the "pag
hu, 24 Jan 2008 13:47:21 +0100
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looks
> >
> > On 23/01/2008, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree 100%.
I've been toying with firefox beta and it does in fact use GTK theming now.
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:47:21 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] moving from
> ubuntu-looks to clear-looks> > On 23/01/2008
te: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:11:38 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looks
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 9:53 AM, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> 3. If you want the lines gone you&
Ken and xl (once again great effort xl):
Do you think this might be a wonderful opportunity to attempt and ease
off of the stuck-in-this-mindset conservativism by implementing a small
yet significant change to Ubuntu?
I believe this can be accomplished by making the shift to Murrine with a
custom
like this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/SmoothMergedGradients?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=HumanMetacity.png
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:11:38 -0600From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: Re: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looksOn Jan 23,
2008 9
I agree 100%. I just posted that pic as an example of the menubar and toolbars.
_however_ ... http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:11:38 -0600From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: Re: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looksOn Jan 23,
On Jan 23, 2008 9:53 AM, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. If you want the lines gone you'll need to petition the gtk engine
> developers to allow me to add a patch to the clearlooks engine. I'm running
> my altered version and the patch is transparent to the existing gtkrc's that
> alre
If they don't want to add these changes to clearlooks we could go back to
ubuntulooks and add the code there. Either way it wouldn't be too hard.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan
> 2008 16:58:37 +0100> Subject: Re: [ubunt
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 16:53:00 xl cheese wrote:
> 1. Easy fix. the metacity button prelights also need some tlc.
> 2. Easy fix.
Cool!
> 3. If you want the lines gone you'll need to petition the gtk engine
> developers to allow me to add a patch to the clearlooks engine. I'm
> running
xl cheese wrote:
> 1. Easy fix. the metacity button prelights also need some tlc.
> 2. Easy fix.
>
> 3. If you want the lines gone you'll need to petition the gtk engine
> developers to allow me to add a patch to the clearlooks engine. I'm
> running my altered version and the patch is transp
the contrast of the menubar and toolbar gradients more or less.
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/preview.php?preview=1&id=73163&file1=73163-1.jpg&file2=&file3=&name=clearlooks+hack
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re:
> [ubun
Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
>> Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
>>> You should try Aurora engine and Aurora Themes
>>
> Cory K. wrote:
>> This was the engine that had no reason to exist right? The one forked
>> from Murrine and could be done within Murrine?
>
> This kind of answer should not exist, right ?
> An
Murrine is one of the two engines I considered changing to (either clear-looks
or murrine, then). I am guessing that murrine is much more flexible than
clear-looks. Personally, I like murrine very much ;-)
--
Ken
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 14:16:54 Cory K. wrote:
> Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
> >
This kind of answer should not exist, right ?
And I'm asking here all members of this list.
So please do not respond without arguments - also please respond if you
have something to say about. Else ..just to point here some vanity -
this is not the scope of this list.
Cory K. wrote:
> Nemes Io
Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
> You should try Aurora engine and Aurora Themes
This was the engine that had no reason to exist right? The one forked
from Murrine and could be done within Murrine?
-Cory
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ub
fun.
> >
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:07:12 +0100
> > > Subject: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looks
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:07:12 +0100
> > Subject: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looks
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After discussing the ubuntu-looks engine with a few developers we have
> > decided to look into replacing it with clear-looks (or perhaps murrin
You should try Aurora engine and Aurora Themes before (v1.3 AND 1.4)
some of them here (please check links from the page)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=566881&page=2
(Aurora Borealis is a good example).
A .deb with the new Aurora Engine (v.1.4)
http://www.costmoon.ro/aurora/gtk2-engin
menu bars
that has been implemented.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Wimer
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:07 AM
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to clear-looks
Hi all,
After
Gummy version and the Glossy again. The previous glossy theme wasn't right.
Theres also a pixmap for the panel background. Tossed it in for fun.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:07:12 +0100
> Subject: [ubuntu-art] moving
Glossy Clearlooks...
I'll send out a gummy version in a little bit.
I used the clearlooks metacity and removed the button borders.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:07:12 +0100
> Subject: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubun
I can email out a gtkrc tonight.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan
> 2008 13:07:12 +0100> Subject: [ubuntu-art] moving from ubuntu-looks to
> clear-looks> > Hi all,> > After discussing the ubuntu-looks engine wi
Hi all,
After discussing the ubuntu-looks engine with a few developers we have decided
to look into replacing it with clear-looks (or perhaps murrine) for Hardy.
This means that we need a gtkrc of the new variety (which one can change the
colors to afterwards) based on the current ubuntu theme.
26 matches
Mail list logo
