** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544
Title:
[BPO] package-notes/13 from
accepted, thanks!
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056201
Title:
[BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056732
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.6.5 for jammy
** Also affects: rpki-client (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056732
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.6.5 for jammy
** Changed in: rpki-client (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056201
Title:
[BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble
To
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046150
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.9 for jammy
approved, very sorry for the long delay.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046150
Pinging this again, with follow up to try to push this through.
I propose that we allow backports with no associated bug if all these
conditions are met:
1) The package has already been accepted into the backports pocket for
the target, or older (still supported), LTS release. In order to avoid
Hi all,
Since our next regular meeting date (in 4 weeks) lands right in the
middle of EOY holidays, let's push our next meeting into Jan 2024.
Does Jan 10 work for everyone? Let me know if not, otherwise I'll send
out invites next week.
Thanks!
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 10:57 AM Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd be interested in pushing grub2-unsigned 2.12* to the various
> -backports pockets during the 24.04 cycle (tentatively 1 upload
> each in February, March, April for each release series), before
> we push it to -updates
ust release though...?) as I have a
> > server related task for that to work on.
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: ubuntu-backports On
> > Behalf Of Dan Streetman
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023
Backports are intended for new functionality or features, and should not
be used to fix bugs. This sounds very much like the current jammy
openconnect is broken with some cisco servers, and should be fixed via
SRU instead of using backports. Please open a bug and proceed using the
normal SRU
I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require -
backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this,
so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as
well.
As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic
queues, and we've
I scheduled the next meeting for Nov 29, at the same (DST-aware) time,
which results in 16:00 UTC (due to the DST change).
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 9:35 AM Thomas Ward wrote:
>
> agreee +1 on skipping
>
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy
>
>
>
> Original message
> From: Mattia Rizzolo
>
Hi all,
I just reviewed and approved the cockpit-* uploads to jammy-backports,
looked fine and no concerns there, thanks!
For the uploads to lunar-backports, we had decided on a policy of not
accepting backports into non-LTS releases, unless an exception was
granted, so I didn't approve those
Hi,
Sorry I wasn't able to make the last meeting date; I'm looking at when
to schedule the next meeting, and since mapreri will be away at
Debconf soon, and not available until late Sept (per IRC comments), I
was thinking of scheduling the next meeting for Wed Sept 27. I know
that's a big gap
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:08 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> we skipped today's meeting pending a reschedule; does May 31 work for
> everyone?
Ping for this; does either May 31 (next Wed) or June 7 (following Wed)
work for everyone as a next mtg date? Same time as usual, 1
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug
Resending with all of Martin's emails on his launchpad page, in case
one of those reaches him.
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:13 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> Unfortunately it seems this message didn't get to Martin, as today
> there was another self-approved upload for cockpit.
>
> I'
ignore it and let him
continue to self-approve his backport uploads?
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 1:53 PM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> It seems you have been uploading the cockpit package to the backports
> pocket for some releases, and then approving the upload yourself.
>
&g
Hey,
we skipped today's meeting pending a reschedule; does May 31 work for everyone?
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016037
Title:
[BPO] carla/2.5.4-0ubuntu2 from lunar
Excellent thanks; upload approved.
For future backports, it helps the review if you provide the link to the
ppa used for building/testing as well as a bit of detail about testing
you did.
Thanks!
** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received
I assume the PPA you refer to is https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-
ppa/+archive/ubuntu/backports.
Since that PPA also has many other backported packages that aren't in
jammy-backports, can you build the backport with only the jammy-
backports pocket (and jammy-release, jammy-updates of course)
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998834
Title:
[BPO] memtest86+/6.10-4 to Jammy
i sponsored this and, per comment 13, also approved it.
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Replying to keep this thread alive.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:24 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> Replying to keep this thread alive.
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:43 PM Daniel Streetman wrote:
> >
> > This is to start/continue the discussion from the last meeting, to get
&
Hi Martin,
It seems you have been uploading the cockpit package to the backports
pocket for some releases, and then approving the upload yourself.
While you (clearly) still have technical access to approve uploads to
the backports pockets, the process has changed and you are no longer
on the
> That is, if Fantu can put a backported 6.10-4 into the PPA and then
you sponsor it to -backports ddstreet you can Just Do It with the
approval.
excellent that sounds like a plan, thanks teward!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is
Wow someone got crazy with the epoch, jumping from 1 to 4! Wonder what
happened there... (not relevant to this backport, just surprising ;-)
It LGTM, but the backport-from is still in kinetic-proposed (from lp:
2009354), so we need to wait for that to migrate into kinetic-updates
first.
Also for
@teward yeah, i did notice that but (as i said in comment 7) the change
does seem pretty minor and it's not really Fantu's fault that new
versions went in upstream while he was waiting for a sponsor. But yeah,
it would be better to use the latest version.
Fantu can you put a backported 6.10-4
> @ddstreet thanks for sponsoring the upload, is there any news related
to it?
just waiting for one of the other backports team members to
review/accept it, @teward @mapreri either of you able to review it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
** Also affects: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> For the reviewer
and of course it's up to the reviewer to decide if it's ok to accept
this version backport or if this really should use the latest lunar
version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
I sponsored this to jammy; this is now waiting on a backports team
member (other than me) to review.
For the reviewer, note that the latest version in lunar is 6.10-4, so
this backport is slightly behind; but this backport request was opened
when 6.10-2 was the latest version in lunar. Since the
I just sponsored this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1998834
as the bug lacked sponsorship for a while, the version provided by the
backporter is 6.10-2, while in lunar, the latest version is 6.10-4. As
I explained in the bug comment, I felt it was ok to sponsor
The s390 build seems completely broken, most likely due to no fault of
the libreoffice package; the infrastructure seems to be broken, as it
repeatedly fails to build and also fails to produce any build log.
@ricotz do you want to mark this as fix-released since the other archs
are completed and
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002941
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.4.4 for jammy
ak in with microreleases to core SSL
> libraries (openssl, nss, gnutls, ...).
>
> With this discussion brought up, it was discussed in #ubuntu-devel with
> me pinging both Dan Streetman and Mattia Rizzolo in IRC, Mattia chimed
> in on the discussion and with our discussion there, mysel
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:21 AM Alex Murray wrote:
>
> Hi Ubuntu Backporters Team,
>
> The Tech Board is hoping to progress the ratification of a charter for
> the Ubuntu Backporters Team as discussed previously on a number of
> occasions. My understanding is that these previous discussions
@fantonifabio can you prepare (and test) a backported package for this?
And upload as well, if you have upload rights.
The backports team does not usually prepare backports, we only
review/accept uploads (though occasionally we upload a backported
package that someone has prepared).
** Changed
Marking as invalid for -backports; please open a new bug for the SRU
process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002211
Title:
[BPO] python-websockets/10.2-1 from kinetic
> I guess, addressing this via SRU would be the better solution after
having a look at the other bug report.
yes if the issue is an actual bug then it should follow the SRU process,
so that all users get the fixed package.
** Changed in: python-websockets (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =>
Is this backport only to fix the bug mentioned in the description? If
so, it would be better and more appropriate to fix python-websockets in
jammy using the SRU process, not backports.
Additionally, there are reverse-deps for python-websockets:
$ reverse-depends -r jammy python3-websockets
to call a vote to
approve it as our official team rules/policies at the next team
meeting, on Dec 21.
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:26 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 10:31 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >
> > Hello hello,
>
> sorry for the delay! and
we briefly discussed this in the backporters mtg and it looks good to
us, however it's backported from 0.188-1 which is currently in lunar-
proposed, so that needs to migrate to lunar-release before we can accept
this backport; feel free to ping us once that's happened.
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996076
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996082
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 10:31 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> Hello hello,
sorry for the delay! and thanks for the feedback :)
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:26:17AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter
>
> I still find weird th
teward were you going to sponsor this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076
Title:
[BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
To manage notifications about this bug
this is done, with a newer version:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/limnoria/2022.9.20-1~bpo22.04.1
** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug
As a reminder, please review the charter and policies pages; I would
like to call a vote at next week's meeting to approve both of these,
or at least gather all comments or needed changes. I feel it's
important to get this done.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:26 AM Dan Streetman wrote
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic
** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987356
Title:
[BPO] elfutils/0.187-1 from Kinetic
To
I have the charter and policies pages updated with draft wording as we
discussed in previous meetings. Please give it a review and we can
discuss in next week's team meeting.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Policies
Thanks!
--
Replying to keep this thread alive.
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:43 PM Daniel Streetman wrote:
>
> This is to start/continue the discussion from the last meeting, to get clear
> wording on what backports the team will accept without a corresponding bug.
>
> For reference, discussion was started at
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987045
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.3.5 for focal
Comments:
1. This adds Suggests: flit, python3-build, python3-tomli,
python3-installer; however, those aren't available in focal.
2. Similiarly, the newly-added package pybuild-plugin-pyproject Depends:
on the python3-{build,installer,tomli} packages, which aren't available
in focal.
3. This
** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980579
Title:
[BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from
** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980579
Title:
[BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from
** Changed in: libfile-dirlist-perl (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980580
Title:
[BPO]
** Changed in: libfile-dirlist-perl (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980580
Title:
[BPO]
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:50 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06:10AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > very sorry for the late notice, but I can't make the backporters
> > meeting today, unfortunately.
>
> We figured on IRC that we'd be posponing th
Hi,
very sorry for the late notice, but I can't make the backporters
meeting today, unfortunately.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Right, I don't think anything needs rebuilding.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758
Title:
[BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
To
Sorry for the delay in responding.
The backports team for Ubuntu does not actually prepare backported
packages, we rely on the maintainers and/or users of individual
packages to prepare and upload (or get sponsorship for the upload) of
backported packages. We are only responsible for backporting
thanks, I reviewed and uploaded to the focal-backports queue.
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
@kilobyte have you been able to find a sponsor to upload for you, and
also can you clarify that you tested the backport and verified it works
correctly (as mentioned in comment 3)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the
** Also affects: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
uploaded to -backports queues for bionic and focal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758
Title:
[BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
To
uploaded to -backports queues for bionic and focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
Title:
[BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package
as impish is a non-LTS release and will EOL next month, marking as
wontfix.
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
The backporters team decided in a previous mtg to take the approach of
reverting the use of debugedit.
** Summary changed:
- debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing
dependency)
+ [BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building
(missing
As this still requires a sponsor, I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-backporters
team, and subscribing the ubuntu-sponsors team, however it's up to you
(Preetham Gujjula) to follow through with preparing the backported
package and finding a sponsor to upload it for you.
--
You received this bug
As this still requires a sponsor, I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-backporters
team, and subscribing the ubuntu-sponsors team, however it's up to you
(wurstsemmel) to follow through with preparing the backported package
and finding a sponsor to upload it for you.
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974167
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.2 from
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974167
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.2 from Kinetic to
** Also affects: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 4:30 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this wednesday june 1st I'll be coming back from
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/de/2022/DebianReunionHamburg - at
> the time of the meeting I'll be traveling on land but I won't be able to
> join IRC.
>
> I'd like to
This is released now for focal-backports, except for arm64/armhf, which appear
to be having quite a hard time keeping up with builds, as they currently
haven't even started:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~bpo20.04.1
I'm marking this fix released for
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to
Ok that sounds good to me, thanks!
One note for future changes, in this upload the bug reference was 'LP:
1971109', however the launchpad tooling requires that to be 'LP:
#1971109' (with the '#'); it's not important enough to require a new
upload but do try to remember for next upload.
** Also
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973594
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.7 for focal
Hi, sorry for the delay, accepted into focal-backports.
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Looks mostly ok, couple of questions though:
1) the description says 5.6.2 has several important bugfixes; if that
means the 5.6.0 version in jammy is affected by those bugs, the correct
approach is to patch that version to fix the bugs. The backports pocket
shouldn't be used *instead* of the SRU
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969808
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969808
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 7.2.6 for focal
To follow up on this; during the team mtg today, we agreed to leave
the draft charter as is, awaiting specific feedback from the TB.
Please read the mtg minutes for more details.
https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/04/06/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:57 PM Dan Streetman wrote
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 5:01 PM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:21 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
> >
> > Hello TB,
> >
> > The Ubuntu Backports team has drafted a Charter and we request that
> > you review it and, if you approve, please prov
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:21 AM Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> Hello TB,
>
> The Ubuntu Backports team has drafted a Charter and we request that
> you review it and, if you approve, please provide your approval
> ("ratification") by email. If you have any concerns or co
So, it looks like the TB 'ratification' of our charter is basically
stalled and I don't see any kind of vote on it actually happening
anytime soon.
What I'd like to propose to our team is to simply drop our need to get
any kind of ratification from the TB, and to remove the TB approval
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> Sorry for not making clear my intentions in the bug description.
No problem, it was my misunderstanding, and sorry for the confusion.
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in:
> also backporting debugedit sounds like the correct thing to do
I don't think we can backport debugedit for i386 currently, since
debugedit's i386 build depends on debhelper which depends on debugedit's
i386 build.
Maybe we can do a build without the backports pocket in a PPA, then
binary-copy
> *If* want to fix this in bionic and focal, a full SRU will be
required
agreed, and that would require its own [SRU] bug separate from this
[BPO] bug
> I'll take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon.
@teward did you get a chance to prepare this? I didn't see it in the
upload
Just a note that this needs a sponsor to review and upload it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To manage
** Changed in: simplestreams (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951601
Title:
[BPO]
I just realized I probably misunderstood, as this is fixing bugs in the
*previous* backport for this, which (if that's the case) is totally fine
to backport as-is.
Can you just clarify if that's correct, and also if any of this
backport, or the last backport, fixes bugs in the official focal
1 - 100 of 931 matches
Mail list logo
