As of recent updates, this issue seems to be fixed.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058785
Title:
Blank screen after login
I confirm your findings. I also found this:
https://xubuntu.org/news/xubuntu-is-now-on-github/ which does suggests it is
the official site. The ones I found were from just searching via a search
engine.
** Changed in: xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received
Please provide the URL you are referring to. Both the "A4" and "US
letter" PDF links work fine from here:
https://docs.xubuntu.org/current/user/C/index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The "sudo dhcpcd" command worked to get my network back. I had to do
another update/upgrade cycle before network-manager would re-install.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059651
Title:
After the extensive upgrades of today no network. As per this bug
report, network-manager seems to be gone. In my case this is a 24.04
Ubuntu Desktop QEMU/KVM VM running on my main Debian server host.
In my case the command was "sudo apt dist-upgrade"
** Attachment added: "dpkg listing"
After a fresh install (from the 2024.03.23 ISO in this case) everything
is fine if I don't change the screen resolution from the default of
1014X768. Issues start once I change the display to 1680X1050, but seems
to recover after an idle time screen blank/lock cycle. It seems I get
into trouble
Note that interestingly, the newly installed VM screen did start working after
an unknown amount of time.
I have reboot since and it still isn't working after some minutes. I had
disabled screen locking and screen blanking when it last worked, which might be
relevant as those wore the operating
Public bug reported:
I installed 24.04 on a VM under my main Debian server host on 2024.03.17 and
using the daily.
It worked fine.
After upgrade yesterday and after the 2nd re-boot the screen is blank after
login. The screen is okay during re-boot, which I initiaited via an ssh session
(I had
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2049405 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049405
The referred to missing URL is expected because the 11.04 documents have
been deleted after it hit EOL many many years ago. I set this as a
duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2049405
I figured out that I can copy and paste the link into any browser on any
computer and then give permission for "this program to access Launchpad on your
behalf".
Therefore I am able to continue with my work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I do not know why does this (the first line is normal and is present for
context, the second isn't):
doug@desk-nn:~$ bzr whoami "Doug Smythies "
doug@desk-nn:~$ bzr launchpad-login dsmythies
The authorization page:
(https://launchpad.net/+authorize-token?oauth_token=...
hidden...S_
Public bug reported:
It seems to have crashed after a timeout period of 900 seconds. I don't
know what it wanted or why, as I was merely trying to tell bzr my user
name in the very same way I have been doing for over a decade. I do not
know why some request for interaction with a browser was
I thought the gnome version might be available to view, but I couldn't
find it. I couldn't remember their development directory name, but,
after many failed attempts, finally found the "unstable" directory:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/unstable/screen-shot-
O.K. thank you for your input. I confirm deletion of "--video=vmvga"
allows things to continue.
Historically, that was needed in and since 2013, when the default video
"cirrus" did not work. I now observe the default video is "qxl" which
seems to work.
Ya, apport logs are not needed for this
Since the legacy installer is no longer available, is it correct to say
the workaround is no longer an option?
I am unable to even get started with a 22.04 server VM install on my Ubuntu
22.04.4 server host.
I submitted bug #1950914 months ago, and wonder if it is duplicate with this
bug. I use
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757
Title:
[UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757
Title:
[UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide
To
tatus: New => In Progress
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
An issue with the various reddish background banners is that everyone
seems to use something a little different for RGB. Examples: 233/84/20;
220/70/29; 208/86/48; 221/72/20 and so any logo that has a visible red
area around the white circle of friends part has a visible transition
against such a
This is the hack job PNG file I created for the test. Obviously the box
will have to be more X direction pixels, which shouldn't be an issue.
** Attachment added: "new header PNG hack job"
I did a hack job to make a new header_logo.png file. I used the same
foot print of 292X27 pixels, which doesn't fit the entire string, so
it'll have to be bigger. The background has some texture, so one can see
the outline of the circle of friends part.
The png file isn't global, after all. I was
Changing the html pages header logo is going to be a little more work.
It'll have to have more pixels vertical so as to include the rectangle.
But then perhaps not because the background is RBG: 221.72.20 anyway, so
nobody will be able to see its borders. The word "documentation" is
truncated
O.K. I am attaching another 32X32 logo with transparent side bands.
This is not official and for test purposes only.
Yes, Marcos, I believe your version ended up too narrow. The issue is
that the earlier one I created was re-sampled from a 793X514 pixel
original, and: 1, the bicubic filter
Hi Gunnar,
For the HTML banner part: Yes, and I hadn't even noticed that it would
need updating also. So we would also need an official version of it.
For the 32X32 PNG file: So sorry. The one I created was just for a test,
and never intended to be the official version. I actually thought/hoped
Just as a test, I created a 32X32 pixel rectangle logo example. This
screen shot is rather zoomed in. It doesn't look very good on a normal
screen.
Regardless, we would need master files to replace what we are using now.
That would be a 32X32 pixel PNG file and a favicon.ico file for the HTML
I observe that even at ubuntu.com the favicon.ico has not changed. What
we use is based on the favicon.ico.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757
Title:
New icon still not present
Okay, thanks Gunnar for pointing me in the right direction. I did not
know. Something like the attached would be all we could do quickly.
While not of the proper rectangle dimensions, it is a square (and
probably a few pixels too big), it at least would have the new look for
the circle of friends
Just for clarity, is the attached a representative example of what is
being asked for?
** Attachment added: "An example of what is being asked for"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5580220/+files/docs-logo-question.png
--
You received this bug
We are simple volunteers here on the Ubuntu-docs project. We have no
clue how to help you and/or change the documentation in such a way as to
help you. We wish we could. I suggest you ask a question on
askubuntu.com or on ubuntu forums.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Reference: shell-workspaces-switch.html, shell-workspaces-switch.page
confirmed on a 22.04 VM desktop.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
O.K., and after some reading about IPv6, I agree with Manfred.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965942
Title:
Netmask should be replaced by Prefix?
To manage notifications about this
Netmask is the correct term. I don't currently have a desktop running to
see what is being referred to by prefix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965942
Title:
Netmask should be
Thank you for taking the time to submit a bug report. Unfortunately this
is not a bug in the help docs, but more a user or specific Bluetooth
device issue, which might get better visibility and help via
askubuntu.con or ubuntuforums.org or similar.
I have to set this to invalid.
** Changed in:
-Original Message-
From: ubuntu-server On Behalf Of
Christian Ehrhardt
Sent: February 9, 2022 12:59 AM
To: Bryce Harrington
Cc: ubuntu-server
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Server Guide updates suggested by commenters
On 2022.02.09.12:59 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:31
I would still likes to know what MSR 0x64F says, as per comment #20.
Yes, thermald should have been disabled for all of this stuff, and I
thought it was.
Recall one the askubuntu threads, where I suggested writing 0x4005C to
MSR 0x1FC. Do so at your own risk.
Your hardware seems to have issues,
Your processor is indicating this:
PROCHOT# or FORCEPR# Event (bit 2, RO) — Indicates whether PROCHOT# or FORCEPR#
is being
asserted by another agent on the platform.
The related sticky log bit is also set.
This is something I suspected a couple of months ago, on one of those
askubuntu
Sorry, 0x16f was wrong, it should have been 0x64F. I have no idea why
you are doing strace on this stuff. Since you haven't used my decoder,
it will be sometime before I manually decode.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Since the intel_pstate driver is asking for 3.4 GHz, but the processor
itself is only granting 0.8 GHz we now know that the throttling is
within the processor and not externally driven.
It might be related to what koba noted in comment #8, I don't know.
The processor has MSRs with bits to
When the frequency seems stuck at 800 MHz, then please put a load on a
CPU and look at the pstate request and granted MSR's.
Example, where I force CPU 2:
$ taskset -c 2 yes > /dev/null
and then look at the request and granted pstates:
$ sudo rdmsr --bitfield 15:8 -u -a 0x199
8
8
48
8
30
8
8
8
Try changing to the powersave governor. If something else set another
pstate request and the intel_pstate driver doesn't know about it, then
with the performance governor it might never send a new pstate request.
All of this is very similar to a few months ago, on askubuntu and the path of
If the intel_pstate scaling driver is "active" then "powersave" is the
default governor. If the driver "passive" or the is the acpi-cpufreq
driver during boot, then the default governor will be "ondemand". Note
that "active-powersave" is crudely the equivalent of "passive-ondemand".
You can
He is using the intel_pstate CPU frequency scaling driver. Now by
default processors without HWP will boot into the intel_pstate driver in
passive mode (A.K.A. intel_cpufreq).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On the parent page, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/cdimage/daily-live/ , it
says "Latest images to have passed any automatic testing; try this
first" for the "current" directory. And indeed, those files are dated
November 5th for the AMD64 versions. And yes, they do install fine,
however that is not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1951399 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1951399
Ubuntu,Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fails to install
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Norbert wrote: "Surprisingly Ubuntu is not affected, so were installed
normally."
Disagree. It is affected and does not install.
I had set bug #1950875 as a duplicate of bug #1950132, but you removed
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** No longer affects: linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215665
Title:
With Kernel 3.11RC6 Ubuntu servguide PDF compile crashes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1950132 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950132
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1950132
jammy jellyfish daily test install crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
This bug might be duplicate with bug #1950132, not sure. In this case it
was AMD64 desktop iso:
jammy-desktop-amd64-2021-11-13.iso, 3122440192 bytes, Nov 13 00:37
I have installed Ubuntu Desktop VMs on this Debian host server before,
but not recently.
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
This is a new installation from the daily iso of 2021.11.13.
It crashed and wanted to send you this.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
Since you discovered that it is nvme drives that are not found, doesn't
that make this bug report a duplicate of bug #1841037? And read therein
that an update release is coming.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This is not a documentation bug.
** Description changed:
Nach Bereitschaftmodus ist Lan Verbindung & Externe Festplatten weg?
+
+ Translation: Lan connection & external hard drives gone after standby
+ mode?
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubuntu-docs 20.04.3
This is not a documentation bug.
** Description changed:
Bereitschaftsmodus Kabel LAN & Externe Festplatten(USB)nicht mehr Verbund?
Bei Neustart ist wieder da!
+
+ Translation: Standby mode Cable LAN & external hard drives (USB) no longer
networked?
+ When you restart it is back!
Within the context of this bug report it is valid, as it is specifically
about the mainline PPA.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
When we try to help people, either here on launchpad or on forums, very
often we would like them to try the latest mainline kernel, just as a
test to determine if the issue has already been fixed upstream. This bug
prevents that useful option for previous Ubuntu versions.
This dependency should
Public bug reported:
Modern Intel Processors (since Skylake) with HWP (HardWare Pstate)
control enabled and Idle State 2, C1E, enabled can incorrectly drop the
CPU frequency with an extremely slow recovery time.
The fault is not within HWP itself, but within the internal idle
detection logic.
O.K. there isn't any useful information in this bug report, nor does it
sound like a docs issue.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
verguide open
over the last few days, and it has got to be
just the most annoying thing ever.
>
>> On 2020-04-13 8:14 a.m., Doug Smythies wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some sort of chat agent has appeared on the
> > > new discource Ubuntu serverguide 20.04
On 2020.04.13 09:38 Joshua Powers wrote:
>
> This is now removed from the server docs.
Well, it seems to have been turned on again.
> On 2020-04-13 8:14 a.m., Doug Smythies wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some sort of chat agent has appeared on the
> > new discource U
I tested apt version 2.0.3. This:
sudo apt install gnome-user-docs* gnome-getting-started-docs*
whereas it did not before, and I had to use Gunnar's workaround from
comment #6 above.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug
On 2020.05.07 01:58 Robin Winslow wrote:
> Sorry this is quite a delayed update,
> but the publishing issue for the server
> guide was fixed by IS on 29th April,
> and has been building daily ever since.
Yes, I noticed. Thank you.
> You can always find the latest version of the
> PDF with the
this doesn't appear to be a bug at all, and not against ubuntu-docs in
particular.
If the existing kernel module, uvcvideo.ko, doesn't work for you,
perhaps look for support on askubuntu.com elsewhere.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug
** Summary changed:
- Server docs have broken links
+ Instllation guide has broken links
** Summary changed:
- Instllation guide has broken links
+ Installation guide has broken links
** Project changed: help.ubuntu.com => installation-guide (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification
I had troubles compiling the installation guide on a 20.04 computer.
Additionally, i had an issue with the redirects to a the new serverguide site.
The installation guide will be there past noon UTC.
i was not aware of the "Official Doumentation" link issue, but it should
also be fixed upon
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
By the way, once the redirect is fixed it will go to here:
https://ubuntu.com/server/docs
not here:
https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/network-ntp
** Branch linked: lp:help.ubuntu.com
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => help.ubuntu.com
--
You received this bug notification because you
)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
The release day publication (the job runs at noon UTC) of help.ubuntu.com will:
. change the "lts" and "stable" links as normal for the desktop help and
installation guide, but delete them for the serverguide.
. redirects for the serverguide html and pdf have been added to .htaccess to
send
Addendum:
On 2020.04.22 07:13 Doug wrote:
>>
>> I haven't checked the PDF in the past so I don't know what to estimate.
>>
>
> The note on the intro source page [3] says once per day,
> I waited about 30 hours, but didn't see it updated.
> My purpose here, was less to do with my edit, but to
>
On 2020.04.22 03:50 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:13 AM Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:31 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> On 2020.04.21 00:03 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:58 PM Doug Smythie
On 2020.04.21 00:03 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:58 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2019.11.21 07:08 Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> On 2019.11.20 23:00 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:11 AM Doug Smythies wrote:
>>&
On 2019.11.21 07:08 Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2019.11.20 23:00 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:11 AM Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> On 2019.11.19 09:32 Joshua Powers wrote:
>>>
>>>> The new official home for the Ubuntu Server Guide is
@Gunnar : Thank you for the workaround. It solved my problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
Title:
apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases
To manage
On 2020.04.13 11:52 Tim McNamara wrote:
> This isn't actually a bot. There are real people sitting behind it.
Yes, I am aware.
> It's part of our desire to be helpful across ubuntu.com to be responsive when
> people need help.
> I am happy to raise this though. Could you please clarify the
Hi,
Some sort of chat agent has appeared on the
new discource Ubuntu serverguide 20.04 web pages.
Sometimes someone appears to be present,
other times is says "leave a message".
My question is why is it there at all?
Can it be eliminated?
References:
https://ubuntu.com/server/docs
... Doug
Ya, those e-mails to the lists were too big, due to big html and with an
embedded png file. So they bounced even after being approved in
moderation. I sent an edited e-mail to the lists.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 2020.03.29 13:21 Robert Ancell wrote:
> A UI freeze exception has been filed (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868019)
> to add fractional scaling support to Settings. This adds a new switch that
> toggles this feature as shown below:
Note that your html based e-mail with an embedded png file was
For what it's worth, the versions of things in my test computers, all
servers, no GUI:
name: serv-ff (a 20.04 VM, that has not had an update since around February
12th):
initramfs-tools: 0.133ubuntu14
kmod; 26-3ubuntu1
name: s18 (a physical i5-9600K based computer, up to date as of a few days
I think bug 1864992 and this one are duplicates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864436
Title:
depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
not open builtin
** Changed in: kmod (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864992
Title:
depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
not
I have a 20.04 VM that I had not run for awhile (Feb 12th). It has kmod
version 26-3ubuntu1, and installed mainline kernel
5.6.0-050600rc4-lowlatency fine.
The other two physical 20.04 test servers have kmod version 27-1ubuntu1,
and both spew the error 5600 times during kernel installation the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1863261 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863261
I don't think this is duplicate either. I agree that this seems to be in
the kernel, but don't yet have proof. If I compile the mainline kernel
(5.6-rc4) myself i get this error 5600 times (once per
Just an F.Y.I follow up:
On 2020.01.20 16:34 Doug Smythies wrote:
>On 2020.01.20 11:00 Bryce Harrington wrote,
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:22:39AM -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> On 2020.01.19 17:03 Bryce Harrington wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 04:24:1
On 2020.01.20 11:00 Bryce Harrington wrote,
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:22:39AM -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2020.01.19 17:03 Bryce Harrington wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 04:24:13PM -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> I have not followed the issues, but
800, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> I have been unable to get it working on a new 20.04 installation.
>> If I attempt to install "python-gnuplot" I get:
>
> Yes, efforts in focal development are striving to remove python2, so for
> 20.04 forward the python3-* packages are th
Hi All,
For several years now, my main test server has been 16.04,
as is my main gateway router / firewall / web server.
I missed 18.04 because I was not ready to convert to netplan.
I attempt to contribute to the kernel power management group.
Because it has become a challenge to run the leading
change "affects" to appropriate project.
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => help.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received th
For example, this seems to work well:
doug@goom-i5:~/config/usr/lib/libvirt$ diff libvirt-guests.sh.original
libvirt-guests.sh
114,124c114,126
< i=${CONNECT_RETRIES}
< while [ $i -gt 0 ]; do
< run_virsh "$uri" connect 2>/dev/null
< if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
<
Public bug reported:
The libvirtd service being started during boot doesn't mean it is still running
during shutdown.
libvirt-guests.sh waits around for 10 seconds trying to communicate with it,
re-trying once per second.
The desire is that it either doesn't run at all or it checks if libvirtd
I had this error today.
It was on a 20.04 development test server, upon which I was trying to start a
freshly installed 20.04 server guest.
The error occurred because I had this on my grub command line:
cgroup_no_v1=all
Once I removed it, the VM started fine.
Note that I do not use
Each CPU can have a different request into the PLL (phase locked loop),
but the highest one wins, and their vote does not count if they are in
an idle state deeper than C1. You can observe this manually by reading
the pstate request and granted MSRs directly (requires msr-tools, and
the msr module
There is only one PLL (Phase Locked Loop) in the processor, all CPUs get
the resulting clock. When they go into deep idle states (deeper than C1,
at least for my processor) then they give up their vote into the PLL as
to what the frequency should be. Your single 100% task is dedicating the
CPU
@Davide Sangalli: What you describe and show in your comment #80 is
correct and exactly what should happen. Your processor is spending an
extraordinary amount of time in C1 as opposed to deeper idle states. At
what sampling frequency do you run i7z? I would suggest once every 15
seconds or so, so
Ever since the default changed to never blanking the screen, and after I
whined in comment #18 above, I have been running this in
/etc/default/grub:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=" consoleblank=300 "
always save a copy of grub first, and do "sudo update-grub afterwards",
then re-boot.
--
You
On 2019.11.20 23:00 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:11 AM Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2019.11.19 09:32 Joshua Powers wrote:
>>
>>> The new official home for the Ubuntu Server Guide is now live:
>>>
>>> https://ubuntu.com/server/docs
Hi Josh,
Thank you for getting the site up.
I'll add the note and link from
help.ubuntu.com
On 2019.11.19 09:32 Joshua Powers wrote:
> The new official home for the Ubuntu Server Guide is now live:
>
> https://ubuntu.com/server/docs
>
> On the bottom of each server guide page is a link to the
Hi Josh,
Thank you for your reply.
On 2019.11.06 07:56 Josh wrote:
> On 11/5/19 5:24 PM, Doug Smythies wrote:
>>
>> There are still things to work out for this
>> transition from Docbook to discourse, but I thought it
>> best to wait until after 19.10 was done.
&
Hi all,
There are still things to work out for this
transition from Docbook to discourse, but I thought it
best to wait until after 19.10 was done.
O.K. so now let's get on with it.
Where will the final compiled HTML document be posted?
And would it make sense to simply have it at the same
Not sure what package is the problem, but am sure it is not Ubuntu-docs.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848581
On 2019.09.25 10:28 Bryce Harrington wrote:
> - Removed the git basic usage directions
Sorry to be late to the party.
I disagree with the deletion of the git page.
On 2019:09:12 12:51 Bryce wrote:
> Given the prevalence of git these days, ...
> and I think it is safe to assume most readers
>
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844201
Title:
turbostat is over constrained by dependencies
To manage
1 - 100 of 977 matches
Mail list logo
