Chris, thanks again for your contribution. It's not necessary to both
propose a branch for merging and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the
related bug - either is sufficient to get it on the radar for
sponsorship. Since you already have the merge proposal open, I'm going
to go ahead and unsubscribe
** Changed in: lprng (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719181
Title:
lprng: FTBFS on Natty because of pickier linker
Marking this bug as fixed, as both utouch-evemu and utouch-frame have
been promoted to main, and utouch-grail built against them about 3 days
ago.
** Changed in: utouch-grail (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Also affects: pkg-create-dbgsym (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: pkg-create-dbgsym (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Natty is currently at 0.8.1; current upstream is 0.8.2. I think we've
more or less caught up with upstream at this point.
Can this ticket be closed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
libpipeline finally gives developers a safe and hassle-free way to run
and interact with external programs in C.
I've done a test backport in my PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/backports-tests). libpipeline
includes a build-time test suite, which passed on both
So based on some digging, I don't think the issue here is actually the
one described, at least not immediately.
Booting with single in /proc/cmdline causes the system to emit the
runlevel S event (read switch to runlevel S if you don't feel like
thinking Upstart-y). When the user exits out of the
Of course, once something does actually trigger the gdm job to run (with
the exception of doing start gdm directly), that will still trigger
command-line inhibition code originally described in this bug, so we
would still need to do something about that.
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: pkg-create-dbgsym
It would be helpful if pkg-create-dbgsym wrapped dh_clean in addition to
dh_strip to remove whatever package cruft it just created.
Although pkg-create-dbgsym is typically installed inside transient
sbuild chroots, that's not forced in
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Please only subscribe sponsors when
you're attaching a debdiff to the bug, not when you've also proposed a
bzr branch for merging. Doing both is redundant, as outstanding merge
proposals are listed in the sponsorship queue.
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 455766 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455766
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 455766
resolution_test script does not gracefully handle multiple video outputs
* You can subscribe to bug 455766 by following this link:
ACK from MOTU
** Changed in: mango-lassi (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: mango-lassi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Artur Rona (ari-tczew) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ACK from MOTU
** Changed in: eagle (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: eagle (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Tags added: sync
** Changed in: eagle (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: eagle (Ubuntu)
Assignee
Based on IRC discussion, we think this should possibly be a sync
request, not a merge.
The only outstanding question is if we need an initscript to load the
nvram module on the older IBM ThinkPads that tpb targets. If udev causes
the nvram module to be loaded automatically (which I think it
** Summary changed:
- [backportpackage] add diff option
+ [backportpackage] detect if orig.tar.gz upload needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691897
Title:
[backportpackage] detect
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Summary changed:
- Please backport arduino (0021-2) from natty to maverick
+ Please backport arduino (0021+dfsg-2) from natty to maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports.
arduino is only r-build-dep and only build-dep, which is also being
backported
I have a build of rxtx in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive
/backports-tests), as well as a build of arduino against that version of
rxtx, and I've verified that both packages b/i/r.
** Changed in:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
[19:03] bdrung ebroder: optional 3) i want the workdir in /tmp for
sponsor-patch too
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690927
: But if that was the case, it should be documented in
the changelog as well
[20:51] ebroder: ebroder: okay, i will try to fixing it
Unsubscribing sponsors again for the time being. Please resubscribe when
ready.
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = Mahyuddin Susanto
** Summary changed:
- Please backport rxtx (2pre2-3) from natty to maverick
+ Please backport rxtx (2.2pre2-3) from natty to maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
- bugs with a merge request are often listed twice (once for the bugs,
once for the merge request). Not sure what the best way to avoid those
duplication is, I've unsubscribed the ubuntu-sponsors from some bugs
since
You could potentially work around the regex misinterpretation issue by
using some more complex combinations of grep and awk and so forth, but
there's a better reason to not use getent | grep.
If /etc/nsswitch.conf is configured with a user or group database that
doesn't support enumerating users
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690927
Title
to resubscribe them when you've updated the patch.
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = Mahyuddin Susanto (udienz)
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: tpb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug
You could potentially work around the regex misinterpretation issue by
using some more complex combinations of grep and awk and so forth, but
there's a better reason to not use getent | grep.
If /etc/nsswitch.conf is configured with a user or group database that
doesn't support enumerating users
of the builder
classes, which does whatever magic is necessary)
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder)
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 661218 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661218
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 661218
Please backport vim 7.3
* You can subscribe to bug 661218 by following this link:
** Also affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689217
Title:
Please backport mpich2/1.3.1-1 from natty
I've opened a task for maverick-backports so that we can ensure a smooth
upgrade path from Lucid through to Natty. I've also uploaded test builds
for Lucid and Maverick to my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive
/backports-tests); the test builds should be available shortly.
For each
Ah, sorry - I missed the SONAME bump since the new version hasn't
actually been published yet. In general, we do monitor both r-deps and
r-b-deps as part of the backports testing process - see the discussion
at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports
In this particular case, you're
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668825
Package has no rdepends or reverse build-depends. Package b/i/r on
Maverick.
I have an additional test build in
https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/backports-tests
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535459
Title:
Please
Oliver, I'm a bit confused. As I understand it, the bug described here
was the result of switching gconf to use gdbus, and that change was only
introduced in Maverick. If I am understanding this correctly, then you
could not be experiencing this particular bug on Lucid, even if you're
experiencing
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #606806
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606806
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606806
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
I'm going to reformat this bug slightly. Version 3.0.1 of bitlbee is
only in Natty, not Maverick. In order to maintain a clean upgrade path
from Lucid to Maverick, we will need to backport bitlbee from Natty to
both Lucid and Maverick.
** Description changed:
- The version of bitlbee supplied in
Package has no rdepends, and all build-deps are available in both Lucid
and Maverick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689068
Title:
Please backport bitlbee 3.0.1 from
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535459
** Summary changed:
- Please backport bitlbee 3.0.1 from Natty to Lucid, Maverick
+ Please backport bitlbee 3.0.1-1 from Natty to Lucid, Maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
The specific versioned dependency for openssl is generated when the
package is built. Since we rebuild packages when we backport them, znc
would be built against the correct version of openssl.
However, we only backport packages that are already in the Ubuntu
archive. Since version 0.096 is not
Package has no rdepends, and all build-deps are available in Lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689064
Title:
Please backport znc 0.096 from Maverick to Lucid
--
Can you provide a bit more information as to what's going wrong? What
version of nvidia-current are you using, where are you getting it from,
etc.?
lucid-backports doesn't currently have a version of nvidia-currently, so
it seems like this isn't really a backports-related issue. But if there
is
As a rule, backports should be used to add features, not fix bugs. We
have the SRU process for fixing bugs (see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates).
I'm going to close this bug, and then we can continue the discussion of
starting the SRU process back on bug 631740.
** Changed in:
Err, sorry. I'm going to move the discussion to bug 631960, since bug
631740 looks to be a duplicate of that bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684286
Title:
Please
Package b/i/r on Lucid. Test builds are in
https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/backports-tests
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
Great, thanks for the update.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686590
Title:
dkms fails to identify
** Changed in: ggz-python (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: ggz-python (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: ggz-python (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: ggz-python (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #575082
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575082
** Also affects: ggz-python (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575082
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
Thanks for the patch. I've sponsored this, so it should build and be
available for Natty shortly. I posted some additional comments and more
long-term concerns on bug #474734
** Changed in: ggz-python (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug
NumPy, especially if you can get in touch with upstream and coordinate
such a patch with them.
** Changed in: ggz-python (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors from this bug, since there's an
outstanding merge proposal.
In the future, it's only necessary to *either* subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
*or* create a merge proposal to show up on the sponsorship queue, not
both.
--
You received this bug notification because you
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685656 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685656
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 685656
Open VM Tools module compile failure on Natty (2.6.37)
* You can subscribe to bug 685656 by following this link:
I have seen fglrx handle this correctly, so if we want to optimize for
the most people getting a text-free boot, we may want to make that
determination on a driver-by-driver basis.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks, Martin. update-inetd 4.35ubuntu0.1 in lucid-proposed fixes the
issue as well.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Jorge: We don't re-build non-LTS CDs after they're released, so the
10.10 CD will always have this bug. However, if you upgrade the system
after installing, the bug should no longer be there.
For 10.04, we do point releases every 6 months that incorporate
updates into the CD, so the 10.04.2 CDs
I think a patch that uses libudf would be better, since libudf is
already in main and libdvdread is not - you wouldn't need to go through
the MIR process.
libudf, though in main, also isn't in the default desktop install
currently, but that's not really a big issue, as it's miniscule.
Dan, can
I'm going to unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors from this bug. Merge requests
into UDD branches are listed on the sponsorship queue, so there's no
need to subscribe sponsors to the bug as well.
--
FTBFS new dependency on fop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682621
You received this bug notification
Natty changed looked good, thanks. I've uploaded that. I'll be taking a
look at the SRU shortly.
--
event dispatch can hang under some circumstances
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656503
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Maverick SRU patch looks good as well, so I've sponsored it. It should
be evaluated by the SRU team soon. Thanks for revising the patches.
As part of the SRU approval process, the SRU team will want some
additional information. In particular, they'll need a discussion of what
you feel the
** Changed in: utouch-geis (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
event dispatch can hang under some circumstances
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656503
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
** Also affects: utouch-geis (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
event dispatch can hang under some circumstances
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656503
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
/+attachment/1749359/+files/utouch-geis_1.0.13-0ubuntu1_amd64.build
** Changed in: utouch-geis (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = Stephen M. Webb (bregma)
--
event dispatch can hang under some circumstances
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656503
You received this bug notification because
At this point, Ubuntu Dapper and Hardy are the only releases which use
usplash and are still supported. In Karmic we switched briefly to
xsplash, and then in Lucid we switched to plymouth.
If I'm reading this bug (and Paolo's blog post) correctly, this sounds
like purely a cosmetic issue, rather
** Also affects: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
**
I've reworked this patch and uploaded it to Natty. I'll follow up on bug
#676620 about an SRU for changing Lucid and Maverick to use the new
server.
segler, a few tips for future reference:
* debdiffs should generally be made against the current development
release (i.e. natty, right now), with
** Changed in: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Changed in: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu Maverick)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
radio station board in the rhythmbox radio browser package will move to another
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
Every once and a while I want to grab a source package without actually
unpacking it (e.g. I only want to use it for generating a debdiff). In
those cases, it would be convenient if pull-lp-source supported
something analogous to dget's
I don't think that this patch is appropriate for an SRU. SRU's are
supposed to fix high-impact bugs, such as severe regressions and
loss of user data, and are specifically not supposed to be used as a
mechanism to provide new features. (See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#When)
Oh, whoops - this got fixed in Maverick, so we only need to backport to
Lucid.
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = Invalid
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: grace
+
+ Version 1:5.1.22-6 of grace added support for non-linear peak fitting,
+ which is a commonly
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: grace
Version 1:5.1.22-6 of grace added support for non-linear peak fitting,
which is a commonly needed feature in scientific data analysis.
+
+ Test build uploaded to https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-
+ tests
+
+ rdepends:
+
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: grace
Version 1:5.1.22-6 of grace added support for non-linear peak fitting,
which is a commonly needed feature in scientific data analysis.
- Test build uploaded to https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-
- tests
+ Test build
I've verified that rhythmbox-radio-browser in lucid-proposed is
communicating with the new server (http://www.radio-
browser.info/xml.php) and that it's doing so successfully.
--
radio station board in the rhythmbox radio browser package will move to another
server shortly
Verified rhythmbox-radio-browser in maverick-proposed, as well.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
radio station board in the rhythmbox radio browser package will move to another
server shortly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676620
You received this bug
Thanks for your contribution! I've just sponsored it into Natty. I
edited the changelog to re-target the upload to natty instead of
maverick, and I added the fields from the Debian Patch Tagging
Guidelines (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) so we can more easily keep
track of the patch. Other than
dana: I don't speak Spanish, so it's a bit hard for me to figure out
exactly what happened here, but based on the fact that frontend got
killed, did the installation hang? If the installation of approx hung,
then I suspect this is a duplicate of bug #601732.
Anyway, please provide more
Thanks for the great bug report. Your description of the problem made it
really simple to track down the misbehavior.
I think we can fix this by changing how parse_numeric deals with numeric
root devices. udev creates symlinks in /dev/block/ for every block
device it creates. For instance, I have
Ubuntu now carries 2.02-3; this bug was fixed in 2.02-2.
** Changed in: alpine (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
alpine does not obsolete pine, package install fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Incomplete
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Incomplete
--
Printing duplex in reverse order does not work from many applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370591
You received this bug notification because you
Oh, and I, uh, hope this is obvious, but do please make sure you can
still boot the system if things go catastrophically wrong.
--
wait-for-root has problems with mknod generated root-devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I don't think that this patch is appropriate for an SRU. SRU's are
supposed to fix high-impact bugs, such as severe regressions and
loss of user data, and are specifically not supposed to be used as a
mechanism to provide new features. (See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#When)
Oh, whoops - this got fixed in Maverick, so we only need to backport to
Lucid.
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = Invalid
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: grace
+
+ Version 1:5.1.22-6 of grace added support for non-linear peak fitting,
+ which is a commonly
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: grace
Version 1:5.1.22-6 of grace added support for non-linear peak fitting,
which is a commonly needed feature in scientific data analysis.
+
+ Test build uploaded to https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-
+ tests
+
+ rdepends:
+
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: grace
Version 1:5.1.22-6 of grace added support for non-linear peak fitting,
which is a commonly needed feature in scientific data analysis.
- Test build uploaded to https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-
- tests
+ Test build
** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/maverick/multipath-tools/fix-
crash-on-shutdown
--
multipathd segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in ubuntu.
--
** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/maverick/multipath-tools/fix-
crash-on-shutdown
--
multipathd segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Here's a proposed interface we could use:
Add a new option --builder or -B, which takes an argument of either
sbuild or pbuilder (and obviously others if we add support for more
builders in the future). If -B isn't specified, check
SPONSOR_PATCH_BUILDER, and if that's unset, default to pbuilder
Unsubscribing sponsors since this has been uploaded.
--
kexec --load does not work in maverick amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: rhythmbox-radio-browser (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Please update the package to 2.1.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592538
You received
** Changed in: python-virtualenv (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
Not compatible with python2.7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662611
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The rebuild works for me as well.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
kexec --load does not work in maverick amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Installing approx and openbsd-inetd no longer hangs with update-inetd
4.36ubuntu0.1
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
postinst using both update-inetd and debconf hangs on first install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601732
You received this bug
Unsubscribing sponsors from the bug - the merge proposal itself shows up
on the sponsoring queue
--
postinst using both update-inetd and debconf hangs on first install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601732
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
I use sbuild instead of pbuilder. I would be more likely to use sponsor-
patch if there was an option (or even better, a configuration flag) to
make it use sbuild.
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
gnome-open uses firefox while it's not the preferred browser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670128
You received this bug notification because
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Nov 16, 2010, at 01:55 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Barry Warsaw wrote:
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
I see an override of LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
** Changed in: libgnome (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
gnome-open uses firefox while it's not the preferred browser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670128
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
701 - 800 of 1419 matches
Mail list logo
