Setting back to New status because bug submitter kindly supplied the
requested vsftpd.conf
** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Setting anonymous_enable to YES enables identified login (aknaff), but
(obviously) disables anonymous (ftp) login
Unless I am very confused, the YES in that final sentence in the bug
description was probably intended to be NO :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Setting anonymous_enable to YES enables identified login (aknaff), but
(obviously) disables anonymous (ftp) login
Unless I am very confused, the YES in that final sentence in the bug
description was probably intended to be NO :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
rmadison -s natty gnome-mplayer now shows
gnome-mplayer | 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 | natty/universe | source, amd64, i386
So AFAICS lubuntu-meta (and therefore lubuntu-desktop) can now migrate
to universe.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Remo:
Thanks for the positive feedback!
I'm setting this bug to confirmed, since several people, myself
included, have confirmed it already.
Yes, we're looking at getting this change, or something very similar to
it, officially into Lubuntu.
Normally I don't think xfce4-taskmanager is part of
Per Julien's request, here are a couple of screenshots showing the menu
before and after this changed menu file is used.
** Attachment added: Lubuntu menus without changed menu file
Here is the screenshot with the menu file in place.
** Attachment added: Lubuntu menus after changed menu file is applied
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-default-settings/+bug/650432/+attachment/1844041/+files/lubuntu-menus-after.jpg
--
You received this bug notification
Here is an even more corrected lxde-applications.menu file :)
This one is valid XML as validated by xmllint, which the previous one
was not.
** Attachment added: lxde-applications.menu file that is valid XML
** Summary changed:
- update-manager appears in preferences menu instead of system tools
+ update-manager (and other system wide settings tools) appear in Preferences
menu instead of a System Administration menu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This is not an issue in update-manager at all. The issue is in the
lxmenu-data package.
Specifically, the package includes an Administration menu directory file
lxde-settings-system.directory
However the /etc/xdg/menus/lxde-application.menu files does not use it.
As a result, many
@Anakin Starkiller: I tested with the latest available kernel for Ubuntu
10.04.1 LTS. This is a supported release until April 2013 according to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases .
(1) How would a newer kernel know that a device is lying about whether
it is removable or not?
(2) Is there reason
OK, thanks. I think that will install some packages (aqualung, cheese,
xarchiver, xdg-utils) which will not be uninstalled by adding he
lubuntu-desktop from -proposed. So at that level, the test is not going
to be the same as what will happen when the new lubuntu-desktop is on
the install CD.
SRU explanation 4. in the Description of this bug says To verify,
install Lubuntu and
Does this mean that to verify this proposed change, the tester has to
create an ISO including the -proposed lubuntu-desktop and then install
from that? Seems mildly annoying -- is there a more efficient way
OK. Do we have a test case for which my patch fails?
If the remaining issue is that my patch contains a closing '}', that is
easily solved, because the {} around the variable name are only there
for style reasons, and are not required.
Here is a modified patch without the {} . Is there a test
OK, fix verified:
(1) The lxdm package in -proposed allows automounting of encrypted home
directories at login.
(2) The lxdm package in -proposed does not allow simultaneous presence
of the libpam-ck-connector package.
The whole autoremove problem will become a separate bug.
--
You received
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lxdm
After installing Lubuntu 10.10 from CD, several packages are listed as
being no longer needed and ready for removal by apt-get autoremove.
This list of packages includes ecryptfs-utils and its dependencies
keyutils and libecryptfs0 .
These packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710049
Title:
missing dependency allows encryptfs-utils to be autoremoved
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
There is information in bug #635698 and bug #653628 which is relevant to
this issue.
#635698 is fixed and independent of this autoremove problem, and #635628
is filed against ecryptfs-utils which cannot force itself to stay
installed. Therefore, I opened a new bug report to deal with this
issue,
I've created bug #710049 for the autoremove issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653628
Title:
package ecryptfs-utils 83-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage:
I note that the adduser package Suggests: ecryptfs-utils .
Were it to Recommend: it instead, this issue would probably disappear.
But I suspect there are probably reasons for only suggesting it that I
am unaware of.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
bug #710049 has been created to deal with the autoremove-removes-
ecryptfs-utils issue.
Apologies for having cluttered this bug with it earlier.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635698
OK. Do we have a test case for which my patch fails?
If the remaining issue is that my patch contains a closing '}', that is
easily solved, because the {} around the variable name are only there
for style reasons, and are not required.
Here is a modified patch without the {} . Is there a test
It seems to me a patch to /etc/logrotate.d/apache2 is the simplest
solution.
The attached diff tries to solve the issue and also be more readable,
breaking the one complex line involving backticks into three shorter
simpler lines, no backticks needed.
There are a lot of cases to test this with,
It seems to me a patch to /etc/logrotate.d/apache2 is the simplest
solution.
The attached diff tries to solve the issue and also be more readable,
breaking the one complex line involving backticks into three shorter
simpler lines, no backticks needed.
There are a lot of cases to test this with,
This is probably related to #635698 and specifically to the issue I
noticed while trying to verify a fix for that issue, that several
packages including keyutils and ecryptfs-utils were set so autoremove
tries to remove them when it should not do so.
Workaround for now is likely to be to log in
The issue with the autoremove removing things it should not is NOT
related to this fix.
It exists right after an install from the Lubuntu 10.10 CD. I just
tested this both in a virtual machine, and, out of an abundance of
caution, on a real physical machine too.
So while there is definitely a
I ran Lubuntu 10.10 in a virtualbox VM, added a user with an encrypted
home directory and demonstrated the original bug. Enabled -proposed,
updated the world, rebooted the VM, and verified I can now access that
encrypted home directory immediately after login.
Since I am running virtualbox-ose I
Verified. Lubuntu 10.10 in a virtualbox VM.
Before the updated lubuntu-default-settings PDF files were double
downloaded in Chromium. After the proposed pacakge was installed, they
behave normally, being downloaded once and then opened in evince when
the downloaded PDFs are clicked on.
--
You
Logically, if the libreadline6 package were to put a one line text file
into /etc/skel/.inputrc the issue would be resolved on all new machines
(and all newly created user accounts) from that point forward. The file
would contain the one line
$include /etc/inputrc
and would be automatically
Two ideas:
(1) Is there any way to implement a reconnect device option, as
suggested in comment #7 some months ago?
While less than ideal, this would be one way to help people who make
this mistake to recover from it themselves.
(2) Alternatively, a language change to the context menu, so the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
RELEASE OF UBUNTU:
Description: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release: 10.04
VERSION OF PACKAGE:
nautilus:
Installed: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1
Candidate: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1
Version table:
*** 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 0
500
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706436
Title:
Safely remove drive is not safe for SD card readers
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
David Tombs wrote:
how about opening up a new bug for the text change?
Trying to transform this bug into a UI change might create too much
confusion. :)
OK. There is also bug #404185 which seems highly relevant to all of
this.
I'm a little concerned about having too many bugs all related
OK, let's see if we can get things rolling a little here.
Please find attached a very basic landscale-sysinfo.1 man page.
It would be a lot more useful if it included a section on configuration
which described the config file format and includes an example, but
right now I lack the time and
More than two years, and nine status changes, have gone by... but still
no manpage?
Is writing a man page really much more work than pushing the status of
the bug out every single release? :)
Is there documentation for landscape-sysinfo in some other format, and
if so, where can it be found?
--
No, not really. Which home directory ~ did you have in mind? Linux is
a multiuser system.
Packages cannot add files to or mess with individual user's home
directories during their installation. Which user or users should
xdemorse do this to? All users on the system??
Possibilities:
(1) It
Thanks for helping to improve Ubuntu. In order to confirm this issue,
could you please check what the package installed into your
/usr/share/doc/xdemorse/ directory by posting the output of
ls -l /usr/share/doc/xdemorse/
and also
dpkg -L xdemorse
here? At least on my Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick
ogmrip is already in universe. It performs a similar role to Handbrake.
Packaging Handbrake so it does not need Internet access at build time
will be significant work, and require (I suspect) some ongoing packaging
maintenance to keep current (when upstream picks up a new version of
some
Please indicate why this bug has been changed to visibility: private
In general, please do not change bug status without a comment indicating
why the change is being made. Thanks!
--
more info for the users needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370994
You received this bug notification
Tested from karmic-proposed, works fine for me in Ubuntu Karmic 9.10
amd64.
Testing was done in a virtualbox-ose VM locally, not a production
mailserver. Tested scanning of mail with Date: in 2009, 2010 and in
2020.
--
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later
Tested from karmic-proposed, works fine for me in Ubuntu Karmic 9.10
amd64.
Testing was done in a virtualbox-ose VM locally, not a production
mailserver. Tested scanning of mail with Date: in 2009, 2010 and in
2020.
--
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later
man 1 passwd and reading the text regarding the -l option specifically
says:
Note that this does not disable the account. The user may still be able to
login using another
authentication token (e.g. an SSH key). To disable the account,
administrators should use usermod
--expiredate
Thanks for taking the time to report an issue and so help to improve
Ubuntu.
Selecting the LAMP Server task in tasksel installs Linux (Ubuntu),
Apache2, MySQL and PHP5. By design.
Leaving the root MySQL password blank does not somehow uninstall MySQL.
It just installs it in a less secure way.
man 1 passwd and reading the text regarding the -l option specifically
says:
Note that this does not disable the account. The user may still be able to
login using another
authentication token (e.g. an SSH key). To disable the account,
administrators should use usermod
--expiredate
Thanks for taking the time to report an issue and so help to improve
Ubuntu.
Selecting the LAMP Server task in tasksel installs Linux (Ubuntu),
Apache2, MySQL and PHP5. By design.
Leaving the root MySQL password blank does not somehow uninstall MySQL.
It just installs it in a less secure way.
What remains to be done to get this into Lucid? Unfortunately, I don't
seem to be doing very well at getting us a really truly working Lucid
patch/debdiff!
I tried to set up a Lucid VM yesterday, to test my revised Lucid debdiff
with, but there were X issues going on and I never got as far as a
Martin, Thanks so much for looking at this. I noticed you used the
command python, whereas was using the command python2.6 for my tests.
Is the default Python in Lucid Python 3.0.x maybe? Just a guess at this
point. It may be a silly mistake in my packaging, too! The Karmic one
definitely
Found it; there is a separate list of patches to apply in debian/rules.
I forgot to add my patch to it. I don't understand why the
debian/patch/series file is not sufficient, but that's how this package
seems to work.
New debdiff coming very soon!
--
locale._parse_localename fails when
Debdiff for lucid that actually applies the patch attached. How
embarrassing!
In mitigation, why does a debian/patch/ directory that uses dpatch have
a series file in it? That's very confusing, because as far as I can
tell the series file never gets used.
--
locale._parse_localename fails
** Attachment added: Fixed debdiff for Lucid
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36541698/python2.6_2.6.4-1ubuntu2-fixed.debdiff
** Changed in: python2.6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
locale._parse_localename fails when localename does not contain encoding
information (was:
Added karmic-proposed repository per instructions, sudo apt-get
upgraded, tested.
Seems to work fine for me on Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic amd64.
Specifics:
dpkg -l python2.6 show3s it installed:
ii python2.6 2.6.4-0ubuntu3 An interactive
high-level object-oriented
** Summary changed:
- Update Manager fails to connect to ubuntu
+ Update Manager errors unclear when proxy misconfigured
--
Update Manager errors unclear when proxy misconfigured
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Apparently those reporting the bug are unable to connect to one Ubuntu
mirror, the one at us.archive.ubuntu.com.
It would be worthwhile for anyone experiencing this issue to try using a
different mirror, in a different country, such as de.archive.ubuntu.com,
and see whether that allows them to
Confirmed. After installing gclcvs on Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic amd64, I see
this issue too.
Basically, this means that something about the package gclcvs is
unhappy. Please try
sudo apt-get purge gclcvs
in a Terminal, as a first step. This appears to take care of the issue
for me.
The problem
Setting to incomplete. This is turning into a possible documentation
bug rather than an actual bug in update-manager, I think.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
Update Manager fails to connect to ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462041
You
Testing confirms that this code works fine for locales containing
@modifier. On Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Desktop, I ran
# Install all available language packs (may take a while!)
sudo apt-get install ^language-pack-\*
# Test every locale on the system
for i in $(locale -a) ; do echo $i ;
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: alacarte
Main Menu worked with first ubuntu 8.04 installation. After serbian
language pack installed program did not working any more and in the
terminal generate errors such like this:
u...@computer:~$ alacarte
Traceback (most recent
mrooney:
I'm not convinced that this is ready for implementation:
I think the unanswered questions I can see here include:
(a) How does the system determine whether the issue really was caused simply by
a hard shutdown or power loss (and so decide that fsck -y is likely to be an
appropriate
Per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess I am setting this to be
assigned to noone and subscribing ubuntu-main-sponsors .
** Changed in: python2.6 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned)
--
locale._parse_localename fails when localename does not contain
I have updated the bug description with the info the SRU process
requests, to the best of my ability.
Jonathan
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: alacarte
Main Menu worked with first ubuntu 8.04 installation. After serbian
language pack installed program did not working any
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: alacarte
Main Menu worked with first ubuntu 8.04 installation. After serbian
language pack installed program did not working any more and in the
terminal generate errors such like this:
u...@computer:~$ alacarte
Traceback (most recent
Apparently for an SRU we need to get this change accepted into Lucid.
So, here is a debdiff for the Lucid version.
** Attachment added: debdiff for Lucid version of python2.6
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36106160/python2.6_2.6.4-1ubuntu2.debdiff
** Changed in: python2.6 (Ubuntu)
@Alvin: file a new bug against ubuntu-serverguide, the package which
installs the Ubuntu Server Guide :)
Note that this bug is marked Invalid, so adding stuff to it will not get
much accomplished.
--
No password set on install of slapd-2.4.18-0ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447099
You
@Alvin: file a new bug against ubuntu-serverguide, the package which
installs the Ubuntu Server Guide :)
Note that this bug is marked Invalid, so adding stuff to it will not get
much accomplished.
--
No password set on install of slapd-2.4.18-0ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447099
You
If you think the fix is ready for release, it might be worth
considering it for a stable release update (SRU).
Do you (or anyone else) think you could follow the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
procedure so that this fix can be considered for Karmic?
OK. I'll give it a go,
Дмитрий wrote:
Good day! Sorry for my poor English. I use Ubuntu 9.10 x86 and the
extensions GDB debugger for monodevelop don't work. When I attempt to
debug my programm, I get error warning: GDB: Failed to set controlling
terminal: Operation not permitted\n. How I can fix it or help You fix
Attached is my initial attempt at a debdiff for the Jaunty python2.6
package.
This will hopefully build in my PPA at
https://launchpad.net/~jmarsden/+archive/ppa/ overnight. Brave souls
who want to download and test the updated Python packages from there are
very much welcome to do so.
Jonathan
Don't know if it's important, but all the version numbers in the debdiff are
2.6.2 (Jaunty's version),
and the current vesrion in Karmic is 2.6.4.
Yes, here is a separate debdiff for the Karmic version. This one is
building in my PPA now.
Jonathan
** Attachment added: debdiff for Karmic
The upstream patch to locale.py suggested by nicsabacovic does solve the
problem when applied to locale.py, at least in Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic.
After applying it (by hand, since it is for python 3.x and does not
apply to 2.6 using patch), alacarte runs in the sr...@latin and sr_RS
locales.
debdiff
fusiondog: Could I recommend that you consider doing something positive?
If you are willing to work with upstream (that is, with the developers
of openssh) to get this option included by default in their released
source code, that would make getting it included into future releases of
Ubuntu
fusiondog: Could I recommend that you consider doing something positive?
If you are willing to work with upstream (that is, with the developers
of openssh) to get this option included by default in their released
source code, that would make getting it included into future releases of
Ubuntu
Which (Debian-packaged) version of BibleTime is this issue being
reported for?
Please see https://edge.launchpad.net/~pkgcrosswire/+archive/ppa for
current BibleTime pacakages for Ubuntu Hardy, Intrepid, Jaunty and
Karmic.
I believe this issue with the desktop file was fixed several months ago
Isaac wrote:
Who are the creators of the program cone, so that I may forward them
questions on SMTP setup?
Internet search resulted in nil for who the developers are.
Cone is Ubuntu/Debian packaged software, so I would suggest that you
use a more appropriate search tool :) A quick
Apparently apache2-mpm-worker *is* the default choice of mpm, at least
some of the time (though the machine I first checked on had apache-mpm-
prefork, I am unsure why). My mistake, it would appear.
Using apache2-mpm-prefork would appear to be a viable workaround, unless
it leads to performance
Apparently apache2-mpm-worker *is* the default choice of mpm, at least
some of the time (though the machine I first checked on had apache-mpm-
prefork, I am unsure why). My mistake, it would appear.
Using apache2-mpm-prefork would appear to be a viable workaround, unless
it leads to performance
Mike,
I suspect the problem was caused by an odd/corrupt/invalid set of
answers to the configuration questions for postfix, which are normally
stored in /var/cache/debconf/config.dat .
If you happen to have a backup of that file from the time when the issue
occurred, we could look at that file
Dekar: Did you actually test this at all? Please provide some evidence
to support your claims.
You have said that you believe this issue is:
A real problem, exploitable for many people in a default
installation. Includes serious remote denial of services,
local root privilege escalations,
Mike,
I suspect the problem was caused by an odd/corrupt/invalid set of
answers to the configuration questions for postfix, which are normally
stored in /var/cache/debconf/config.dat .
If you happen to have a backup of that file from the time when the issue
occurred, we could look at that file
Dekar: Did you actually test this at all? Please provide some evidence
to support your claims.
You have said that you believe this issue is:
A real problem, exploitable for many people in a default
installation. Includes serious remote denial of services,
local root privilege escalations,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ebox-dhcp
The package of ebox-dhcp in Ubuntu Alpha 6 is
ebox-dhcp | 0.12.2-0ubuntu1 | karmic/universe | source, all
However, all other ebox pacakges have version numbers like
ebox | 1.3.5-0ubuntu1 | karmic/universe | source, all
As a result,
Mike,
(1) The new line in parameters thing means that somehow debconf thinks
there is a newline in a previous stored response to one of its
questions, and that this is a problem. Are you sure you *purged* any
previous postfix install before trying to install it afresh?
I just tried this here on
Mike,
(1) The new line in parameters thing means that somehow debconf thinks
there is a newline in a previous stored response to one of its
questions, and that this is a problem. Are you sure you *purged* any
previous postfix install before trying to install it afresh?
I just tried this here on
** Summary changed:
- can only kill processes with -9 in karmic
+ can only kill processes with -9 in karmic from SSH sessions
--
can only kill processes with -9 in karmic from SSH sessions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Michael wrote: could you give me any hints how I could examine further
why this happens?
The first thing might be to see if it is replicable -- can you install
Karmic Alpha 4 on another machine and check whether you get the same
issue? If not, then either it relates to the current install you
Rajeev Nair: You said: Any user who knows the admin password can
install updates...
Did you actually test this with a user who is not in the admin group?
What admin password do you have in mind, since Ubuntu systems do not
normally have a root password? I think you are mistaken. Only users in
In case it makes a difference, I was using a virtualbox VM rather than a
physical machine to run Karmic Alpha 4 for the above test.
--
can only kill processes with -9 in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I cannot reproduce this here.
sleep 100
killall sleep
works fine for me in Ubuntu Karmic Alpha 4 amd64 (with updates as of
2009-08-16):
Script started on Sun 16 Aug 2009 06:54:43 PM PDT
jonat...@black:~$ sleep 100
[1] 28262
jonat...@black:~$ killall sleep
[1]+ Terminated
cristiancozzolino wrote:
I would like to know if you could contact the developer of the software
wammu, because I have some difficulties in using it. In particular, when
I try to view my text messages from my PC, the software doesn't list
them, like no text messages are into the SIM card.
Public bug reported:
Source package name: bibledit
Source package version number to sync: 3.8-1
Where to sync from: Debian unstable main
There are no Ubuntu-specific changes in this package.
I'm hoping this can be synced before Feature Freeze for Karmic. Thanks!
** Affects: ubuntu
Confirmed on Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty amd64.
Steps to reproduce (and capture a backtrace) are:
# Ensure we dump core
ulimit -c 200
# Delete any pre-existing core file
rm core
# Create a command input file for use by gdb
echo bt /tmp/bt
# Create a trivial PHP script
echo -e ?php\n?\n /tmp/a.php
#
Since two people other than the original reporter have now reproduced
this bug, I am setting its status to confirmed.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Segmentation fault when running any script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521
You received this bug
** Summary changed:
- Segmentation fault when running any script
+ Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script
--
Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521
You received this bug notification because you are a
Confirmed on Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty amd64.
Steps to reproduce (and capture a backtrace) are:
# Ensure we dump core
ulimit -c 200
# Delete any pre-existing core file
rm core
# Create a command input file for use by gdb
echo bt /tmp/bt
# Create a trivial PHP script
echo -e ?php\n?\n /tmp/a.php
#
Since two people other than the original reporter have now reproduced
this bug, I am setting its status to confirmed.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Segmentation fault when running any script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521
You received this bug
** Summary changed:
- Segmentation fault when running any script
+ Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script
--
Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521
You received this bug notification because you are a
It was when this failure occured, I changed the hostname to bl5400, and
tried again same result.
I strongly suspect that somewhere in one or more of your system's
configuration files, that old numeric host name still exists.
Please confirm that the old numeric hostname has been edited into the
If the driver concerned were part of Ubuntu that might be fixable. But
you state it is unsupported, so the Ubuntu community can't support it,
unfortunately.
I suspect the driver does not directly need postfix, just any way to
send email out from this machine; postfix is the default choice for
It was when this failure occured, I changed the hostname to bl5400, and
tried again same result.
I strongly suspect that somewhere in one or more of your system's
configuration files, that old numeric host name still exists.
Please confirm that the old numeric hostname has been edited into the
If the driver concerned were part of Ubuntu that might be fixable. But
you state it is unsupported, so the Ubuntu community can't support it,
unfortunately.
I suspect the driver does not directly need postfix, just any way to
send email out from this machine; postfix is the default choice for
To those who are experiencing this issue, and would like it fixed:
PLEASE provide more specific detail on exactly how to reproduce this
issue.
So far, we do not even seem to have information on which release of
Ubuntu is involved, much less which versions of apache2 and php5 and
Joomla. Clear
201 - 300 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
