I've done the upgrade to Linux 5.8.0-21 and had all the old buggy
sympthoms. That all had been caused by the failing of the Virtualbox
Guest Additions installation for Linux 5.8.0-21 during the Linux
upgrade from 20 to 21.
Everything was OK after:
- I installed "linux-headers-5.9.0-21-generic"
It look like one problem has disappeared, I have a display resolution
at 1920 x 1080 now.
I don't remember what happened going from 5.8.0-19 to 5.8.0-20, but
synaptic still marks those headers as manually intalled.
- linux-headers-5.9.0-20-generic
- linux-image-generic
So I assumed that the
Type in the headers name it is NOT 5.9 but 5.8
On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 17:10 +, Joshua Peisach wrote:
> Check this on any other distro with Cinnamon DE: Does this occur with
> them too? (Get an unstable ISO like Fedora 33 Beta)
>
> But this is definitely something important.
>
--
You
Chromium snap works fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898656
Title:
Firefox not playing YouTube videos in Virtualbox on Xubuntu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
In Xubuntu Firefox does not play videos of e.g. YouTube or the Dutch TV
Viewer. It works in all other Virtualbox VMs with e.g. Ubuntu 20.04,
Ubuntu 16.04 or Windows 10 Pro. The problem is related to the buffering
(stats for nerds). It build up the buffer and when the buffer
The problems all disappeared after running the synaptic package manager on
request of the notification in the panel. I did run
- fix broken packages
- mark all upgrades and there were 5-7 upgrades indicated.
So probably the software-updater caused the problem and left the system
with those
Public bug reported:
I have two packages that refuse to run after updating the system and
they are:
-Lollypop, a fresh install
-ICE running Firefox with the WhatsApp web site.
Firefox only shows a black screen and nothing else, while Lollypop gives
the following error message after a time out:
See annex for df and udiskctl not working and uninstallable. See:
bertadmin@Host-R3:~$ udiskctl dump
Command 'udiskctl' not found, did you mean:
command 'udisksctl' from deb udisks2 (2.8.4-1ubuntu1)
Try: sudo apt install
bertadmin@Host-R3:~$ sudo apt install udisks2
Reading package
Sorry udiskSctl my error, see log annex
** Attachment added: "log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1869444/+attachment/5415692/+files/log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Cinnamon 20.10 does not install nor update the Linux headers,
that are required for the Virtualbox Guest Additions. The upgrade from
Linux 5.8.0-18 to 5.8.0-19 went wrong after reboot, because the screen
was using the default 800 x 600. It was not possible to update to
I have the same problem in Groovy Gorrillaa
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889196
Title:
infinite loop on start if misconfigured
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
That report is so long ago. I don't know, what happened anymore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843340
Title:
Boot menu not displayed for multi boot with ZFS
To manage
Basically I backup every weekend again from my 64-bits Ubuntu to my
32-bits FreeBSD. I solved the issue by setting the property
dnodesize=legacy for the datasets I wanted to backup. I also reloaded
those datasets once to get the storage with the right dnodesize
everywhere.
The problem has been
Any reason to invalidate the bug report?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843296
Title:
ZFS auto scrub after upgrade to Xubuntu 19.10
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Dank U, but I prefer Conky, because it displays each 2 seconds; RAM
size; SWAP size and SWAP throughput :)
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 01:48 +, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> You can see the memory usage by running:
>
> free -h
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Normally I run the VM with Transmission, Firefox/WhatsAPP and Evolution.
Sometimes I add a second Firefox window or LibreOffice Calc, but that's
all. I never noticed a crash and I have no problems with responsiveness,
despite a relative large SWAP usage, since the VM runs on top of ZFS
(lz4
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390245/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390244/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390246/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390242/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390236/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390241/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390243/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390239/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390237/+files/Lspci-vt.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390240/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390238/+files/Lsusb-v.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390235/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
I run my "work" VMs and in Xubuntu pulse audio often does not start. In
this dump I tried to start music through Firefox and through my media
player quodlibet and none of the audio starts.
See attachment with
apport information
** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330/+attachment/5390234/+files/CRDA.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886330
Title:
Note that I run Firefox twice in two different windows. One window is
for the WhatsApp website, the other windows is for youtube. This is the
ONLY system, where I use two windows of Firefox both potentially using
pulseaudio. The WhatsApp windows has used or tried to use pulseaudio in
the past.
--
Pulseaudio was running, but the music did not start. It stayed in the
initial position. I have the impression that Firefox creates the
problem. The music in quodlibet played. I stopped it and I started
Firefox to play a music video from youtube, it did not play. Afterwards
quodlibet stopped
Public bug reported:
I run my "work" VMs and in Xubuntu pulse audio often does not start. In
this dump I tried to start music through Firefox and through my media
player quodlibet and none of the audio starts.
See attachment with the pulseaudio volume control and quodlibet stuck on
time 0:00
Public bug reported:
The autostart does not work in Ubuntu-DDE. The same file works in the original
Deepin 15.1 and the script also works if started in the terminal.
See screenshot.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: gnome (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
I use the same conky file for all Ubuntu 20.04 versions, only here the
display is black instead of partly transparent. Even the original Deepin
15.1 does display it correctly partly transparent.
-- - Windows Settings
own_window = true,
Public bug reported:
See the screenshot in the annex with system monitor and disk utility display:
With respect to the display of the file systems tab in Ubuntu 20.04 booted from
zfs, we could say: "All similarity to reality is purely coincidental" :)
** Affects: zsys (Ubuntu)
Importance:
sion, I will shut up.
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 09:17 +, Didier Roche wrote:
> Sorry BertN45, but you are using a development version and should
> know
> what you do as such.
>
> First, the garbage collection of snapshots is just entering ubuntu in
> the next few hours (remember th
OK, close the bug-report.
On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 22:47 +, Colin Ian King wrote:
> I'll close this bug report if that's OK.
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854480
Title:
Public bug reported:
Updates of my system stopped, because the boot partition has been
cluttered up with snapshots. Note that remedy in the error message is
completely wrong! See the annex!
>From a programming point of view zsys and zsysctl do work and are an
achievement. However from an
I've detected, that if you select a virtual desktop through the mouse on the
displayed virtual desktop panel on the right, all desktops are displayed at the
same moment on the screen.
If you use the Windows-key and page-up page-down the display is as expected and
perfect :)
--
You received
I moved to Ubuntu 20.04 and I do not have that problem anymore.
I stopped with writing directly after the login the value to the file
/sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_max.
I now only rely on "options zfs zfs_arc_max=3221225472" in
/etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf.
Problem solved in 20.04 and I tried
I updated my i5-2520M laptop and I do not have the problem there. I use
Ubuntu Mate 20.04 there and the same Virtualbox release, exactly the
same VMs (copied from the desktop) do not give the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I think it happened after an update of the Host OS Ubuntu 20.04: A full
screen VM display correctly. However each Host screen with a window is
displayed with the last full screen Virtualbox VM. Last is the one with
the highest number. I can get even 3 virtual desktops mixed in one
screen, see
Public bug reported:
Since the update of Tuesday night 24th of March, two of my desktops get
mixed into one screen. It is virtual desktop 2 with with Xubuntu 20.04
and desktop 3 with an empty Host screen with the exception of Conky.
See also my annexed screenshot.
ProblemType: Bug
Problem solved in all my Ubuntu Family members (Ubuntu, Ubuntu Mate,
Ubuntu Budgie, Kubuntu and Lubuntu)
On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 12:07 +, Emanuele wrote:
> I confirm that it has been resolved, I made the update without
> problems.
> Thank you
>
--
You received this bug notification because
I tried apt, apt-get and synaptic, but there is no normal way to
reinstall/install the new version of libcrypt1. Even synaptic force
package version did not work, so I decided to wait for your correction.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I do weekly backup for my VMs, so I first update/upgrade all VMs before the
backup. The first two systems passed without problems (Host OS Ubuntu 20.04 on
ZFS and Xubuntu 20.04 VM on ext4). The next two failed a few minutes later
(Ubuntu 20.04 VM and Ubuntu Mate 20.04 VM). I restored the zfs
There is nothing wrong with my keyboard layout. Typing sudo -s
without touching the keyboard for any additional input, gives those
password error messages, as explaned in the original report.
Like I said my system is working again due to snapshots, I will wait
for a new corrected update.
On
Thank you, but I run VMs on top of ZFS, so I restored the Virtualbox
vdi file from the last snapshot and blocked futher updates. I'll wait
for the correction. If needed, I can easily try-out something, using
this time the VBox snapshots.
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 21:35 +, Manfred Hampl wrote:
>
Of course the proposed apt correction did not work since sudo fails. I
don't use any ppa!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867469
Title:
Update failed on allmost all Ubuntu 20.04
See the error message that had been displayed .?field.comment=See the
error message that had been displayed .
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2020-03-14 17-25-57.png"
Public bug reported:
Today the update of almost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems failed. Afterwards
the system can't be rebooted and even the recovery mode does not work.
This is one of the symptons and I even did not touch the keyboard.
bertadmin@VM-Budgie:~$ sudo -s
Sorry, try again.
Sorry, try
** Description changed:
- The panel and the conky display flicker very strongly during many operations,
bus especially during the whole process of using the software-updater. Only
xubuntu has the problem, ubuntu, kubuntu. lubuntu, ubuntu-mate and
ubuntu-budgie have no problem.
- It only
Public bug reported:
The panel and the conky display flicker very strongly during many operations,
bus especially during the whole process of using the software-updater. Only
xubuntu has the problem, ubuntu, kubuntu. lubuntu, ubuntu-mate and
ubuntu-budgie have no problem.
It only happens when
I display it constantly using conky (see attachment) and conky is using
${color}L1ARC / ${color0}Hits%: ${color}${alignr}(${exec cat
/proc/spl/kstat/zfs/arcstats | grep -m 1 uncompressed_size | awk
'{printf "%4.2f",$3/1073741824}'}) ${exec cat
/proc/spl/kstat/zfs/arcstats | grep -m 1 size | awk
Yes you did miss something. Of course the value is changed in
/etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf. I changed it myself! However zfs is ignoring
that value and is using considerably more memory for L1ARC.
If I wanted to limit the size of L1ARC, I had to change the value in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1829401 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829401
The bug occurred after my upgrade to Focal Fossa after the reboot, while
I was reactivating the ppa's.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Before the zsys of 27 Feb update I had created a snapshot for the system
BOOT, ROOT and USERDATA datasets. These snapshots are reported by
"zsysctl show" for the USERDATA datasets, but they are ignored for the
BOOT and ROOT datasets.
see annex with:
zfs list -t snapshot
The system uses xattr=sa, but I did not set it myself. Like you can see
in the annex, it has been inherited from rpool everywhere and it has
been set by the installer.
I annexed the properties
- Home of Ubuntu, which properties I did not touch at all (except
canmount) and
- my main dataset with
I did not blame you, I only noticed a seemingly missing process in the
communication between both groups (ZOL/ZOF or Ubuntu/FreeBSD).
I said I already tried your proposed case in a different way. I'm always
willing to try something else, but I need to understand why. I'm not a monkey,
that has
I now also filed a bug-report Bug 243730 for FreeBSD with the following
ending;
Ubuntu and FreeBSD did choose different defaults for large-dnodes and
dnodesizes, but to solve bugs related to feature incompatibility both
groups have to communicate! The problem will not disappear completely,
Garret Fields also specified some test and the result of those test
were as specified here.
I used Ubuntu 19.10 and FreeBSD 12.1. I detected the issue running
FreeBSD 12.0.
Both system have the large-dnode feature active! Weekly I do send the
data with the param -c, there is however one
"dpool" is another datapool created with Ubuntu 19.10 and it had the
same defaults with respect to "large-dnode" as rpool. My main problem
has been with rpool, since it took my whole nvme-SSD. By the way the
same happened in FreeBSD with zroot, during the install it also took
all space on my
What do you mean with "a compact reproducer"? I can reproduce the error
easily, but I have no clue, how to produce more info? I'm still
relatively new to FreeBSD.
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 01:20 +, Richard Laager wrote:
> So, one of two things is true:
> A) ZFS on Linux is generating the stream
>
> That's really bizarre. If it supports large_dnode, it should be able
> to
> receive that stream. Ideally, this needs more troubleshooting,
> particularly on the receive side. "It said (dataset does not exist)
> after a long transfer." is not particularly clear. I'
The easy, lazy solution is to close this bugreport. However if you
start to use this install option on servers in server farms, you might
have this problem more frequently. The OpenZFS website has a matrix
with which features are supported by which OSes. It would be relatively
easy to implement
The problem disappeared :)
On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 17:08 +, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
> Sorry for the lack of timely feedback BertN45.
> Are you still seeing this issue with the update to firefox
> 71.0+build5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 ?
>
> ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
>
I did hide my errors :)
On the ZOL site Richard Laager advised me to look also at the dnodesize
property for the datasets, since both systems had the zpool feature large-dnode
"active". He assumed that the send/receive should work. The FreeBSD system had
all dnodesizes from all datasets set to
I updated both Ubuntu and I upgrade FreeBSD to 12.1, but it did not
help. Both system remain incompatible. A serious regression that forces
me to fall back on rsync-backup or ext4-boot with correctly featured
user datapools with large_dnode disabled.
So what else should we learn:
- Never break
I updated both Ubuntu and I upgrade FreeBSD to 12.1, but it did not
help. Both system remain incompatible.
So what should we learn:
- Never break the send/receive compatibility, especially not if you demand
during the install the complete disk (Ubuntu) or all complete disks (Raid-0 or
1)
I will add an overview of the features of all involved datasets.
The feature@userobj_accounting and feature@project_quota are not
supported by FreeBSD 12.0 and are not part of feature list of FreeBSD as
annexed, but they are active in Ubuntu. Why? I don't use them and don't
intent to use them
I decided to add the properties of my Dec 2018 archives datapool and
dataset of the Ubuntu PC. That dataset-backup still works between Ubuntu
19.10 and FreeBSD 12.0. I did send an incremental update a few days ago.
I noticed that the archives feature@large_dnode is enabled and not
active, maybe
** Description changed:
After I tried to back-up my datapools from Ubuntu 19.10 to FreeBSD 12.0
as I have done since June each week, I found out it did not work
anymore. The regression occurred after I reinstalled Ubuntu on my new
nvme drive. I also had to reorganize my own
Public bug reported:
After I tried to back-up my datapools from Ubuntu 19.10 to FreeBSD 12.0
as I have done since June each week, I found out it did not work
anymore. The regression occurred after I reinstalled Ubuntu on my new
nvme drive. I also had to reorganize my own datapools/datasets,
** Description changed:
In the past I could limit the size of L1ARC by specifying "options zfs
zfs_arc_max=3221225472" in /etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf. I tried even to
- fill /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_max directly after login, but
- none of those methods limits the size of L1ARC. It
Public bug reported:
In the past I could limit the size of L1ARC by specifying "options zfs
zfs_arc_max=3221225472" in /etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf. I tried even to
fill /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_max directly after login, but
none of those methods limits the size of L1ARC. It worked nicely
Well the people involved in the design and maintenance Richard Laager
and Didier Roche warned me NOT to upgrade, so I did not upgrade the
pool. My bug was about the confusions caused by that message.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
I use Virtualbox for Ubuntu 19.10. I have an installation with two disks, one
to boot from zfs and one to boot from ext4. The last one has zfs also
installed, but the update of zfs failed on many "directories not empty"
messages. I'm 74, but still learning and one day ago
Public bug reported:
When I select a youtube video, nothing happens. I have to stop and start
the video to get it going. While it is stagnant, it slowly builds up its
buffer till 2 minutes, but the video most left button displays, that it
is running, but like I said, I have to stop and start it
OK, thank you, that solved the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852793
Title:
Various problems related to "zfs mount -a
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Running sensors-detect, k10temp has been detected, but is indicated as
autoloaded.
Running sensors it is not displayed, so it is missing, resulting in a mess in
my conky temp display.
I run a multiboot with Ubuntu 19.10 and there k10temp is detected and
displayed, but both
** Description changed:
I boot from ZFS since the begin of the year. I have a multi-boot situation
with:
- Ubuntu 19.10 with Virtualbox booting from ZFS
- - Ubuntu Mate 19.10 with QEMO/KVM booting from ZFS
+ - Ubuntu Mate 19.10 with QEMU/KVM booting from ZFS
- Ubuntu 19.10 booting from
** Description changed:
I boot from ZFS since the begin of the year. I have a multi-boot situation
with:
- Ubuntu 19.10 with Virtualbox booting from ZFS
- Ubuntu Mate 19.10 with QEMO/KVM booting from ZFS
- Ubuntu 19.10 booting from ext4
I have two problems with zfs:
- the last
Public bug reported:
I boot from ZFS since the begin of the year. I have a multi-boot situation with:
- Ubuntu 19.10 with Virtualbox booting from ZFS
- Ubuntu Mate 19.10 with QEMO/KVM booting from ZFS
- Ubuntu 19.10 booting from ext4
I have two problems with zfs:
- the last update of zfs failed,
I have the same problem with my custom install, inherited and upgraded
from my Ubuntu 19.04 system. After each boot I run a small script to
export and import my three pools again. zsys is not installed anymore on
this manual install from early 2019. The system worked without problems
on Ubuntu
This is an ancient bug-report on a HW stack upgrade of 18.04, that should have
included an upgrade from ZFS 0.7.5 to 0.7.9. For those older ZFS releases
0.7.x, SPL is still needed. Only at ZFS release 0.8.x SPL has been integrated
into zfsutils-linux.
I think we could say, that this bug-report
Public bug reported:
The grub update prompt, where you should select the boot device, did reject all
options presented.
Good old
- update-grub and grub-install /dev/sda did work and rebooted the system nicely.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: update-manager 1:19.04.8
Public bug reported:
I have created a new user using the standard Ubuntu utility, but there
is no new ZFS dataset created, like for the first user, that has been
created during installation. See screenshot of home directory and zfs
datasets.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package:
I did find it on Tuesday 14:30 local time, 19:30 GMT on the "Ubuntu
daily builds pending" as far as I can reconstruct it. I also downloaded
Ubuntu Mate that day and the first dirty install worked, but when I
tried to install the same ISO again, it showed the known bug.
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at
OK I reached the same conclusion somewhat later.
That dataset has no mountpoint
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 17:39 +, Richard Laager wrote:
> This is not a bug as far as I can see. This looks like the snapshot
> has
> no unique data so its USED is 0. Note that REFER is non-zero.
>
> ** Changed in:
** Attachment added: "zfslist.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1847637/+attachment/5296278/+files/zfslist.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847637
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2019-10-10 12-51-17.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1847632/+attachment/5296270/+files/Screenshot%20from%202019-10-10%2012-51-17.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
yesterday I did a manual snapshot
today i upgrade the system and part of that large upgrade was Linux 5.3.0-17.
Afterwards I took another snapshot
I expect to see the columns "used" and "refer" to contain realistic
values, not "0" or a some standard value. See screenshot.
Public bug reported:
It is probably a minor problem. I did run an upgrade of my official ZFS
installation in a VM.
It did produce an error:
device-mapper: reload ioctl on osprober-linux-sdb6 failed: Device or resource
busy
Command failed.
I have a dual boot so afterwards I did boot from ext4
** Attachment added: "zfs-update-grub-fails"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1847632/+attachment/5296269/+files/zfs-update-grub-fails
** Description changed:
It is probably a minor problem. I did run an upgrade of my official ZFS
installation in a VM.
- It did
I will read it a few times more, because it is complex. In the past I
booted from ext4 and I had stored all my ~15 Virtual Machines in vms/vms
(and on the desktop I have vms/kvm too). I was pleased with the
instantaneous response times in the VMs, because the Linux VMs did
almost completely
Public bug reported:
I have often problems with zfsutils-linux updates. I have in a Virtualbox VM a
dual boot from two disks,
- one from ext4 (sda), the one with the failing update and
- another one from zfs (sdb).
The whole update process is far from robust, any fly on the road causes a car
OK the next zfs-linux update worked for the system I did the rmdir. For the
system I re-installed the error reoccurred, so I was wrong.
But I still have no idea why rmdir did the job.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
After installing Ubuntu 19.10 on ZFS, the boot process is slow, because
the following file is empty: /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume
I have added RESUME=none
** Affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
After
Public bug reported:
The bpool status is confusing. Should I upgrade the pool or is it on
purpose that the bpool is like this. I do no like to see this warning
after installing the system on ZFS from scratch.
See screenshot
** Affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
101 - 200 of 506 matches
Mail list logo
