[Bug 318511] Re: [jaunty] weird refresh rate behavior with nvidia driver

2009-04-08 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hello everyone! @Alex: Thanks, I'm pretty sure that's exactly the case. Weird, I've searched for half a day and didn't catch any hint of this. (And I'm pretty sure I actually _read_ that Appendix; I probably just skipped over the TwinView parts because this is a desktop machine with a single

[Bug 357220] Re: [System manufacturer P5Q-PRO] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2009-04-07 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24969360/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24969361/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24969362/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 357220] [NEW] [System manufacturer P5Q-PRO] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2009-04-07 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Hello! I assume Apport will give the relevant system details, let me know if more is needed. As far as I remember (this happened right before leaving to work, and I was in a hurry): - I initiated the suspend via the panel; - Music was playing in amarok14. The music was

[Bug 356158] [NEW] gaussian blur distorted when screen rotated

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty/amd64, on a self-built desktop with an NVidia GeForce 9600 video card, running the NVIDIA GLX Module 180.37. (I've got 180.44-0ubuntu1 installed, but haven't rebooted yet, I'll do that and update the report.)

[Bug 356158] Re: gaussian blur distorted when screen rotated

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: How it looks when the screen is in the same rotation state it was when Compiz started http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24859437/correct.png -- gaussian blur distorted when screen rotated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356158 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 356158] Re: gaussian blur distorted when screen rotated

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: How it looks when the screen is 90° rotated with respect to how it was when Compiz started http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24859454/incorrect.png ** Description changed: Binary package hint: compiz Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty/amd64, on a self-built desktop

[Bug 356388] Re: alpha blurred windows show artifacts

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24876499/Screenshot.png -- alpha blurred windows show artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 356388] [NEW] alpha blurred windows show artifacts

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty on a machine with a GeForce 9600 GT video card. I'm currently using nvidia-glx-180 version 180.44-0ubuntu1, however the problem described below has been occurring for a while. Whenever a transparent* window is

[Bug 356388] Re: alpha blurred windows show artifacts

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
In case it's not obvious, I'm talking about the vertical white lines near the sides of the two terminal windows. (However, the artifacts are not necessarily vertical lines every time.) ** Attachment added: my CCSM profile http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24876533/ccsm.profile -- alpha blurred

[Bug 356393] [NEW] scale plugin is buggy with transparency

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty on a machine with a GeForce 9600 GT video card. I'm currently using nvidia-glx-180 version 180.44-0ubuntu1, however the problem described below has been occurring for a while. The scale plugin behaves

[Bug 356393] Re: scale plugin is buggy with transparency

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: Screenshot-2.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24876998/Screenshot-2.png -- scale plugin is buggy with transparency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 356393] Re: scale plugin is buggy with transparency

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: my CCSM profile http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24876903/ccsm.profile -- scale plugin is buggy with transparency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 356393] Re: scale plugin is buggy with transparency

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: Screenshot-1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24876921/Screenshot-1.png -- scale plugin is buggy with transparency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 356393] Re: scale plugin is buggy with transparency

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
The two screenshots above show the difference between two steps of “opacification”, as described above. I just held the button that activates scale, then pressed print screen a few times. As you can see, the windows in the second are visibly more opaque than in the first. Also, it's noticeable

[Bug 356393] Re: scale plugin is buggy with transparency

2009-04-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I've just noticed another strange behavior: If there is exactly one window on the screen that is full-screen (not maximized), then this bug doesn't affect it, it's shown correctly. If there are two, it seems to affect them both. If there are three or four full-screen windows, then exactly one

[Bug 355844] [NEW] update-manager can't show changes lists for PPA packages

2009-04-05 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Hello! I've been a bit surprised that update-manager can't show the changes files for PPA packages. Not only that (missing feature), it also suggests users to visit a completely bogus address to see the changes list (bug). For instance,

[Bug 355869] [NEW] [feature request] the wallpaper orientation should keep count of RandR

2009-04-05 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Hello! I'm running Jaunty, though this doesn't apply to it in particular. As of now, the desktop wallpaper (I believe Nautilus does it by default in Ubuntu) is scaled with respect to the current orientation of the screen. This might seem logical, but today it is easy and

[Bug 353743] Re: padevchooser crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-04-02 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687613/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687614/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687615/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 351001] Re: no sound from sound card, starting yesterday

2009-04-01 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Luke, thanks for looking into this. Fortunately, the problem seems to have gone away in the mean-time. Incidentally, yes, I had tried all the pa* tools, and also IIRC going around PA. I've had my speakers plugged in my second computer, and routed all sounds through the network to it. I suppose

[Bug 351001] [NEW] no sound from sound card, starting yesterday

2009-03-29 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Hello! Running Jaunty, up-to-date. I noticed today that my sound card refuses to output any sound. It worked correctly yesterday. I'd done some updates during the day but didn't restart, I just suspended it. Today I did a reboot, and there's no sound coming out of the

Re: [Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-03-23 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
at least. But patches are always welcome :-) -- Bogdan Butnaru On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, AlterEgo kipvo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bogdan Butnaru , I really appreciate your Amarok 1.4 packages. Are you considering updating those packages according to:  [USN-739-1] Amarok vulnerabilities

[Bug 317540] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed (maybe sshfs related)

2009-03-12 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I haven't had Apport report it crashing, no; but like I said, I've seen at times crashes that Apport didn't mention, so I can't be sure. (Since this particular application doesn't do anything immediately obvious, I can't tell if it crashes unless I'm looking for it; actually, what does it do?) --

[Bug 341971] [NEW] [jaunty] network manager fails to connect to any network

2009-03-12 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty on a Dell Latitude. A month or so ago the network manager stopped connecting to networks. (I haven't reported it before because I didn't have time to investigate, and I don't use this machine that

[Bug 326891] Re: 2.6.27.11 kernel breaks r8169 support for rtl8102e

2009-03-01 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi! I've tried 2.6.27-13-server on a system with an Intel 945GC motherboard running Intrepid 64. It causes a kernel panic on boot. I can get a screen-shot if it's useful. The last kernel that works on the machine is 2.6.24-21-server: $ dmesg | grep -E r8169\|Linux\|eth0 [0.00] Linux

[Bug 326350] Re: [jaunty] aptitude tries to upgrade held package

2009-02-25 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Rolf! This particular condition disappeared after an update, _not_ a {safe|full}-upgrade, so the aptitude version didn't change between the two states. This suggests it was some dependency resolving bug. I can't check if it still exists because I don't know how to return to that particular

[Bug 306641] Re: [intrepid] bash-completion for aptitude doesn't include the build-dep option

2009-02-22 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
The --help option doesn't mention it, but the man page does, and it does work in 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu1 at least. Try sudo aptitude build-dep amarok for example. build-depends works, too. -- [intrepid] bash-completion for aptitude doesn't include the build-dep option

[Bug 306641] Re: [intrepid] bash-completion for aptitude doesn't include the build-dep option

2009-02-22 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
By the way, this bug applies for Jaunty too. -- [intrepid] bash-completion for aptitude doesn't include the build-dep option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 325701] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2()

2009-02-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I can't remember exactly that day. I think I found the message when I turned on the computer in the morning, so I had been logged in for at least a day. Assuming that apport can get confused as you say, it's quite plausible that it did: Although I typically update at least once daily, I tend to

[Bug 137247] Re: libpam-keyring broken on autologins

2009-02-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I don't think I understand; doesn't NM already have such an interface? The only change would be to save the keys in a file instead of placing them in the keyring. (And a single check-box option to toggle between the two.) I don't see why file-based keys would need anything more than what is

[Bug 137247] Re: libpam-keyring broken on autologins

2009-02-17 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
You know, I've been hearing this ever since NM appeared, and I still don't understand why. SSH keeps *private*keys* in plain text files, protected by nothing but file folder permissions (it allows users to enter a passphrase, but doesn't even protest if they don't). I don't see why WPA network

[Bug 322163] Re: no reasonable way of adding custom keyboard layouts

2009-02-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 297428 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297428 I don't think that's a duplicate. That bug only mentions that the documentation was wrong, and it was fixed. This one says that even the correctly-documented behavior is not satisfactory and should be

[Bug 138131] Re: [xkb-data] missing geometry for Dell Latitude D620 keyboard

2009-02-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Bryce, thanks for wondering. I've re-started work on the layout to fix some problems with it, and I'll be posting it on the upstream bug report you opened when I'm done with it. I'll post a note here when I'm done, too. -- [xkb-data] missing geometry for Dell Latitude D620 keyboard

[Bug 324805] Re: ASUSTEK P5Q-PRO Suspend/Resume or hibernate problem

2009-02-11 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Leann! No, it's not reproducible. It only happened that one time, suspend works correctly in general. I left the report open in case it was caused by some transient bug and the logs might help finding it. Otherwise it can be safely closed. -- ASUSTEK P5Q-PRO Suspend/Resume or hibernate

[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-02-10 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Bao2 (and others interested): There is now a build of Amarok 1.4 (derived from the last version that was in Jaunty) in my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~bogdanb/+archive/ppa These have received _really_ minimal testing, so read the warnings first, but they should work. The binary packages are

[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-02-07 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Bao2, you can go to https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+package/amarok and https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+package/amarok-common and download the last 1.4 package for your architecture. Then you have to remove amarok in aptitude, install the downloaded deb files manually (I think I

[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-02-07 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Actually, I'm not so sure about the part with gdebi --apt-line”. I don't remember exactly how I installed the deb files, a double click might have been enough (but make sure you start with amarok-common and then install amarok itself). You can also get the source package for amarok, hack it so

[Bug 326350] [NEW] [jaunty] aptitude tries to upgrade held package

2009-02-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude I've just noticed today aptitude offering to update a held package: bogd...@mabelode:~$ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state

[Bug 317540] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed (maybe sshfs related)

2009-02-05 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I'm not sure how to check; this always happens more or less randomly, so I don't know how to trigger it. I still get bug #317237 regularly, I'm not sure about this one. (I suspect Apport doesn't catch everything: I've had several types of crashes that I've only seen reported once or occasionally

[Bug 324805] Re: Suspend/Resume or hibernate problem

2009-02-03 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21927043/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21927044/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21927045/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 324805] [NEW] Suspend/Resume or hibernate problem

2009-02-03 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Not sure if this will work, but I'll try. I suspended my computer last night, and this morning when I started it I only got a blank screen. (Keyboard LEDs weren't working, either.) I did a hard reboot and upon login I received a bug report; in a while I got a dialog saying

[Bug 325099] [NEW] Suspend/Resume or hibernate problem

2009-02-03 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Got this after a suspend that didn't resume. (Black screen, no response; I hard-booted the laptop after some time.) ProblemType: KernelOops Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume FlagFile: suspend InterpreterPath:

[Bug 325099] Re: Suspend/Resume or hibernate problem

2009-02-03 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21963420/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21963421/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21963422/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 319575] Re: [jaunty] multiload-applet + sshfs breaks suspend

2009-02-02 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Sebastian! To mount via SSHFS I have lines like: sshfs#bogd...@tanelorn.lan:/mnt/corum /media/corumfuse noauto,rw,noatime,user,nonempty 0 0 sshfs#bogd...@tanelorn.lan:/mnt/elric /media/elricfuse noauto,rw,noatime,user,nonempty 0 0 sshfs#bogd...@tanelorn.lan:/

[Bug 315178] Re: dbus doesn't have simple command-line acces like dcop

2009-02-02 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
It's not even close to the simple dcop client. Observe: bogd...@mabelode:~$ dcop TAB amarok kcookiejar kdedklauncher knotify bogd...@mabelode:~$ dcop amarok TAB collection KDirNotify-1 contextbrowser

[Bug 322163] [NEW] no reasonable way of adding custom keyboard layouts

2009-01-27 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xkb-data Hello! I'm running Jaunty, up to date, although this particular problem has been following me ever since Dapper or so: According to /usr/share/doc/xkb-data/README.Debian: “[...] to create a [custom] layout altering the 'a' key, create a

[Bug 318511] Re: [jaunty] weird refresh rate behavior with nvidia driver

2009-01-22 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Since I don't get a crash or anything, I suppose the Xorg.0.log file isn't needed. No warnings or errors there, anyway, except the warning about ABI version (this bug is independent of it). Also, this happens regardless of xorg.conf (I'm pretty sure it happens without any xorg.conf). I've

[Bug 319575] [NEW] [jaunty] multiload-applet + sshfs breaks suspend

2009-01-21 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-applets Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty on two machines, one x86, the other amd64. The following bug happens on both. Steps to reproduce: 1) Add a System Monitor applet on your panel. (The applet's binary is

[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-01-19 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
By the way, I consider loss of ratings as a grave loss-of-user-data bug (they are manually entered). That is very bad even for an alpha release (though it's the only data I _do_ have backups for...) Anyway, isn't it usual policy to enter non-backwards-compatible packages with a different name? I

[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-01-19 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Certainly, I wasn't suggesting we should actually maintain it. But it should* have been easy to just demote the last version of Amarok 1.4 we had to universe/multiverse and leave it like that. (* I have no idea, really.) Actually, I think even just removing the amarok package completely and

[Bug 318511] [NEW] [jaunty] weird refresh rate behavior with nvidia driver

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nvidia-glx-180 Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty on a machine with an nVidia 9600GT card. It uses the nvidia-glx-180 binary driver. My screen is an HP LP2475w. Things mostly work great, but today I noticed something strange. Look at what xrandr shows

[Bug 318511] Re: [jaunty] weird refresh rate behavior with nvidia driver

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Oh, I forgot to mention: When setting the higher-rate mode, I still get streaking in VLC, about the same as before. The screen still reports 60Hz in its information menu. In fact, there's no obvious change at all. I don't have any other display, so I don't know how else to check the output

[Bug 314212] Re: Apport unable to report crash - urlopen error timed out

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Wasn't there an affects me too button somewhere in Launchpad? Anyway, this one affects me too. And for some reason after one or two tries Apport doesn't offer to send a report anymore (no idea if that's intended to happen), and so I can't retry sending it, as Charlie suggested. -- Apport unable

[Bug 315623] Re: [jaunty] weird crash is specific directory

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Connor, thanks for helping. I can't do that exactly because of bug #314212. However I made a backtrace as indicated at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace The backtrace above happens with the source for amarok-1.4.10. I got that originally with apt-get source amarok, but since the Jaunty

[Bug 318552] [NEW] telepathy-gabble crashed with signal 5 in IA__g_value_get_object()

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: telepathy-gabble See bug #315491. (I don't know how to attach the report to that bug.) ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-gabble NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia

[Bug 318552] Re: telepathy-gabble crashed with signal 5 in IA__g_value_get_object()

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21330904/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21330905/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21330906/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 315491] Re: Empathy can't call a GTalk contact (some crashes might be related)

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Visibility changed to: Private -- Empathy can't call a GTalk contact (some crashes might be related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 315491] Re: Empathy can't call a GTalk contact (some crashes might be related)

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hello Guillaume, thanks for helping! I did the same thing and this time apport came up and offered to send a report. It's in bug #318552 because I don't know how to transfer it here. I've attached the debug log below (EMPATHY_DEBUG=all empathy 21 | tee empathy-debug.txt). (I also marked this bug

[Bug 315623] Re: [jaunty] weird crash is specific directory

2009-01-18 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Here it is. ** Attachment added: amarok_addaspodcast.desktop http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21345780/amarok_addaspodcast.desktop -- [jaunty] weird crash is specific directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 314739] Re: [jaunty/amd64] flash plugin no longer has any sound

2009-01-17 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I have another question: why exactly is flashplugin-nonfree using ndiswrapper on 64bit? I use the 64-bit release of Flash directly from Adobe, installed manually, and it work perfectly with Pulseaudio without ndiswrapper. I have had zero crashes or sound problems with it ever since I removed the

[Bug 314739] Re: [jaunty/amd64] flash plugin no longer has any sound

2009-01-17 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by distributing non-final versions via partner; isn't the Flash plugin downloaded from Adobe at install time? And anyway, is only the 64-bit version in beta? -- [jaunty/amd64] flash plugin no longer has any sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314739 You

[Bug 317525] Re: [jaunty] Amarok crashes the second time it's run in a session

2009-01-16 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I use Pulseadio. My sound card does have hardware mixing. I haven't noticed any relationship with other applications, IIRC this happened with just Amarok open. But it always happens the same time: The first time I run Amarok in a session everything works correctly, but if I close it then it

[Bug 133146] Re: ACPI Warning: Incorrect checksum in table

2009-01-15 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hello again! I'm having something similar in Jaunty on my desktop machine, too: bogd...@mabelode:~$ dmesg|grep ACPI Warning [0.676622] ACPI Warning (tbutils-0217): Incorrect checksum in table [OEMB] - C1, should be C0 [20080926] bogd...@mabelode:~$ uname -a Linux mabelode 2.6.28-4-generic

[Bug 317526] [NEW] Amarok can't play files with square brackets in path

2009-01-15 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Hello! Running up-to-date Jaunty, with Amarok 2:2.0.1.1-0ubuntu4. I noticed Amarok refuses to play files whose paths contain any square bracket, i.e. '[' or ']'. Perhaps there are other characters not supported, too. Amarok does add them to the

[Bug 317525] [NEW] [jaunty] Amarok crashes the second time it's run in a session

2009-01-15 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Hello! I'm having trouble with Amarok2: if I run it the first time, it works correctly. If I close it and try to run it again, it crashes. If I log-out, log-in and run it again, it works. Running Jaunty, up-to-date. Amarok version:

[Bug 317535] [NEW] [jaunty] update-manager doesn't honor hold flag for packages

2009-01-15 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Hello! I have a package I marked with hold in aptitude, because the later versions cause problems. Aptitude uses it correctly, meaning that safe- upgrade and full-upgrade don't offer to upgrade it. apt-get also keeps back the package on

[Bug 317237] Re: [jaunty] sshfs mounts sometimes disappear spontaneously, only once

2009-01-15 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
See bug #317540, which I _think_ is connected. It seems I get this report about the same time the mounts go away. It was hard to tell, because the crash reporter didn't work very well for a while, and because I don't usually notice the mount going away unless I'm actually using it. But yesterday

[Bug 317216] [NEW] /etc/init.d/mysql start fails, so package can't be configured

2009-01-14 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Up to date Jaunty, on amd64: $ dpkg -C The following packages are only half configured, probably due to problems configuring them the first time. The configuration should be retried using dpkg --configure package or the configure menu option in dselect: mysql-server-5.1

[Bug 317216] Re: /etc/init.d/mysql start fails, so package can't be configured

2009-01-14 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21217948/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21217949/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- /etc/init.d/mysql start fails, so package can't be configured

[Bug 141234] Re: when updating the network-manager, network connections fail

2009-01-14 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I haven't noticed this in a while, closing. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- when updating the network-manager, network connections fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 317237] [NEW] [jaunty] sshfs mounts sometimes disappear spontaneously, only once

2009-01-14 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sshfs Hello! My desktop: Jaunty, Linux mabelode 2.6.28-4-generic #10-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jan 12 20:05:48 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux My server: Intrepid, Linux tanelorn 2.6.24-21-server #1 SMP Tue Oct 21 23:40:13 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux My laptop:

[Bug 316889] [NEW] [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

2009-01-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Since Amarok 2.x is very different from the 1.4 series (the developers even describe it as a different player), and it's still less stable than that, we should keep in the repository a copy of 1.4, too. ** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu)

[Bug 316452] Re: [jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)

2009-01-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I'm not sure how to even do a downgrade, and I'm too busy this month to learn. About the missing files, I doubt it's exactly related to the above problem (and some of them may note be exactly bugs), but I put below a list of what the script above reports. I don't think I'll have time to do a

[Bug 316966] [NEW] eclipse 3.4 is available, we should upgrade

2009-01-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse I see that Eclipse 3.4 is available http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/, yet the version in the Jaunty repository is just 3.2. Shouldn't we upgrade? ** Affects: eclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description

[Bug 316452] Re: [jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)

2009-01-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I've no idea why, but I'm almost sure libnss3-1d _was_ installed in my case. It was just missing that link, and a simple reinstall added it. -- [jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316452 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 316574] Re: amarok doesn't create its music collecition

2009-01-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I've reopened this, apparently only the i386 and powerpc packages built successfully: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/2:2.0.1.1-0ubuntu3 ** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- amarok doesn't create its music collecition

[Bug 316574] Re: amarok doesn't create its music collecition

2009-01-13 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hmm, I tried that and yes, it does seem to work, but I still had some bugs, so I uninstalled it to clean-up the config, but now I can't add it again until it finishes building. Anyway, does anyone know where Amarok2 _actually_ keeps its collection? I'm _sure_ I deleted everything in

[Bug 316452] Re: [jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)

2009-01-12 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: var-log-apt-term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21134289/var-log-apt-term.log ** Changed in: nss (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = nss ** Also affects: nspr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [jaunty] last update broke some libraries

[Bug 316452] [NEW] [jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)

2009-01-12 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Hello! I'm running an (almost) up-to-date Jaunty here. Earlier today I did an aptitude safe-upgrade, and I didn't check the output very carefully. After a restart, I got a report that the clock applet crashed, which I ignored (it happens); then I noticed my network wasn't

[Bug 316452] Re: [jaunty] last update broke some libraries (libnss3-1d, libnspr4-0d)

2009-01-12 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Just in case somebody needs this, the script below will display missing files from your computer (in the sense that dpkg believes a package supplies a certain file, but the file either doesn't exist or is a dangling symlink). It found quite a few problems, but I didn't have time to figure out

[Bug 316574] [NEW] amarok doesn't create its music collecition

2009-01-12 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Hello! Running up to date Jaunty, with the brand new Amarok 2:2.0.1.1-0ubuntu2 Amarok as provided by the repositories doesn't seem to be able to create its collection database. This seems to be a build config error. Installing mysql-server makes

[Bug 315772] Re: [jaunty] bug reporter doesn't seem to know how to report bugs

2009-01-11 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
I remember I checked then, and I was logged in to launchpad. Unfortunately I don't know what triggered the bug, so I can't trigger the crash again. (In fact, the bug reporter seems kind of erratic in exactly what and when it reports. I often get crashes with no report, and then some time in the

[Bug 315772] [NEW] [jaunty] bug reporter doesn't seem to know how to report bugs

2009-01-10 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Up-to-date Jaunty. I just had a crash report for PulseAudio, and told the dialog that came up to send tho report. It worked for a while and then it opened a web page, supposedly to allow me to enter comment. The page it opened was

[Bug 315487] [NEW] empathy throws DEBUG messages of MC not running.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty, and every time I start Empathy I get these messages in the console: $ empathy ** (empathy:4569): DEBUG: mission_control_get_presence_actual: MC not running. ** (empathy:4569): DEBUG:

[Bug 315487] Re: empathy throws DEBUG messages of MC not running.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
In case someone needs the versions: $ aptitude show telepathy-gnome empathy telepathy-mission-control Package: telepathy-gnome State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 19 [snip] Package: empathy State: installed Automatically installed: yes Version: 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 [snip] Package:

[Bug 315487] Re: empathy throws DEBUG messages of MC not running.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hmm, strange. I ran empathy and got the messages above. Then I tried to call someone on GTalk, and it crashed (the bug reporting app timed out, I'll try again later). Then I ran it again and got a different set of debug messages, but the GTalk (Jabber) account wasn't working. Then I killed it and

[Bug 315491] [NEW] Empathy crashed when trying to call a GTalk contact

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Hi! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty. I just installed Empathy today to try to use audio chat with my GTalk buddies. It seems to run OK for testing, but when I'm trying to call somebody I get either crashes or Jabber disconnects. Some of the time

[Bug 315487] Re: empathy throws DEBUG messages of MC not running.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Or a bit more versions: $ aptitude search -F '%p %V' --disable-columns ~i~nempathy ~i~ntelepathy empathy 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 galago-telepathy-feed 0.13-0ubuntu2 libempathy-common 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libempathy-gtk-common 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libempathy-gtk15 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libempathy17 2.25.2-2ubuntu1

[Bug 315491] Re: Empathy crashed when trying to call a GTalk contact

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
$ aptitude search -F '%p %V' --disable-columns ~i~nempathy ~i~ntelepathy empathy 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 galago-telepathy-feed 0.13-0ubuntu2 libempathy-common 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libempathy-gtk-common 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libempathy-gtk15 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libempathy17 2.25.2-2ubuntu1 libtelepathy-dbg 0.3.3-1

[Bug 315491] Re: Empathy crashed when trying to call a GTalk contact

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Maybe this can help. I've run $ strace -tf empathy empathy.log; then I waited for ~15 seconds to let everything get ready and make the separation clear between startup and call. Then I clicked on the microphone icon next to one of my contacts (she was running GTalk on Windows). I immediately got

[Bug 315491] Re: Empathy crashed when trying to call a GTalk contact

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Hi Pedro. I've tried re-doing everything about a dozen times to retrieve the strace above. The calls not working is perfectly reproducible, but I can't get it to crash again, I'm not sure what triggers that part. ** Summary changed: - Empathy crashed when trying to call a GTalk contact + Empathy

[Bug 315487] Re: empathy throws DEBUG messages of MC not running.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
But... shouldn't debug messages be suppressed by default? I've seen dozens of questions about them, it's confusing because it looks like a problem. Also, it makes straces like that at bug #315491 even more wordy... -- empathy throws DEBUG messages of MC not running.

[Bug 315618] [NEW] [jaunty] Two different plugins tried to register 'NautilusBurn'.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Up-to-date Jaunty. I get the error below when I'm starting Nautilus from the console. I've no idea what's it related to. $ nautilus Initializing nautilus-share extension (nautilus:23926): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried

[Bug 315623] [NEW] [jaunty] weird crash is specific directory

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Up-to-date Jaunty here. Weird situation. I wanted to look at the sources of Amarok for some reason, so I did this: $ apt-get source amarok $ cd amarok-1.4.10/amarok/src $ nautilus . Initializing nautilus-share extension (nautilus:24767):

[Bug 315623] Re: [jaunty] weird crash is specific directory

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: _usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21064297/_usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash -- [jaunty] weird crash is specific directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 315618] Re: [jaunty] Two different plugins tried to register 'NautilusBurn'.

2009-01-09 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
By the way, I noticed this when I encountered bug #315623, I don't know if it's related. -- [jaunty] Two different plugins tried to register 'NautilusBurn'. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 315109] [NEW] startupmanager can't set all available boot resolutions

2009-01-08 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: startupmanager Hello! I've just installed startupmanager and ran it once. I noticed that the Boot options display resolutions offers a certain list of options. It just so happens that it doesn't include every available video mode on my card (nVidia),

[Bug 315162] [NEW] volume keys on different devices can't set different volume sliders

2009-01-08 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon Hello! I'm running up-to-date Jaunty. (Although I'm pretty sure this happens with all Ubuntu releases, I haven't tried it yet.) I have a desktop computer that has an integrated sound card, and I bought recently a USB-connected

[Bug 315178] [NEW] dbus doesn't have simple command-line acces like dcop

2009-01-08 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dbus Hello! I very much like the way I can use dcop (the console DCOP client) to control aspects of Amarok very easily, manually or with scripts. It's ridiculously easy—it even does command line completion, so you don't even have to know or read docs

[Bug 314739] [NEW] [jaunty/amd64] flash plugin no longer has any sound

2009-01-07 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree Hello! I'm running an up-to-date Jaunty (except for the xorg packages, I still use the last version that supported the nvidia binary driver) on amd64 (actually, it's an Intel core2 duo). The last update of the flashplugin-nonfree

[Bug 314741] [NEW] [jaunty] npwrapper leaves dangling symlinks

2009-01-07 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper Hello! I have an up-to-date Jaunty running on amd64. I had flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.15.3ubuntu2 installed, which due to dependencies auto-installed nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu1. Today I did an aptitude purge flashplugin-nonfree, which

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >