[Bug 733836] Re: Error: file not found when booting, then boots up anyway

2014-11-30 Thread Chazbo
Problem still occuring with fresh install of U 14.04 on 11/14. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733836 Title: Error: file not found when booting, then boots up anyway To manage

Re: [Bug 645679] Re: When attempting to add my Brother HL-5150D printer. several problems are encountered.

2012-03-19 Thread Chazbo
for 2 sided copying! So ... finally i can use my printer for 2 sided copying. There are several drivers on the Foomatic database, and i am not sure the one i choose is the best. Peace Happiness, Chazbo On 03/19/2012 03:26 AM, Till Kamppeter wrote: What are these other drivers? -- You

[Bug 645679] Re: When attempting to add my Brother HL-5150D printer. several problems are encountered.

2012-03-18 Thread Chazbo
PLEASE CLOSE THIS BUG. While this problem exists, there are other drivers for the HL-5150D that work better and are easier to use than Cups. Chazbo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

Re: [Bug 645695] Re: Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2012-03-04 Thread Chazbo
Hi Mysha, i am enclosing 3 screen shots that should illustrate the problem. gedit.file is the file first.spelling.error is after tools/check spelling note that the spelling error is not hilighted. second.spelling.error is after ignore note that the spelling error is

Re: [Bug 645695] Re: Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2012-02-09 Thread Chazbo
Thank You for paying attention to this bug, but i am running U 10.04 which uses Gedit 2.30.3, so i cannot answer your question about Gedit 3.x.x. Charles On 02/08/2012 08:47 AM, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: Is this still reproducible in Gedit 3.x.x? Could you please attach a document where spelling

[Bug 645695] Re: Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2011-05-22 Thread Chazbo
As an alternattive solution to the problem, perhaps it would be a better idea to implement the Mozilla Thunderbird Spell Checker. To me it has an easier to use interface and does a better job of suggesting possible alternative spelling possibilities. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 645695] Re: Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2011-05-22 Thread Chazbo
Bug transferred to Gnome Bugzilla, bug 650829 on 5/22/2011. Unfortunately, even though i created this bug, i apparently cannot close it, but it should be closed. Chazbo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

Re: [Bug 645695] Re: Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2011-05-22 Thread Chazbo
I have added this bug to Gnome Bugzilla as #650829 on 5/22/2011, as per your request. Chazbo On 04/18/2011 04:36 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Thank you for your bug report. The issue is an upstream one and it would be nice if somebody having it could send the bug the to the people writting

[Bug 645695] Re: Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2010-11-22 Thread Chazbo
3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). The first error detected by Check Spelling was not highlighted in the document. All subsequent errors were correctly highlighted. Chazbo -- Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent

[Bug 676779] [NEW] package grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-11-17 Thread Chazbo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Ran update and GRUB2 update refused to install. i had just installed GRUB2 from the U 10.04 CD. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7

[Bug 676779] Re: package grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-11-17 Thread Chazbo
-- package grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 646359] Re: If a panel is deleted, it is not possible to re-create it under U 10.04

2010-09-27 Thread Chazbo
this is a bug? Chazbo On 09/24/2010 03:11 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote: This is not a bug. Right click on the remaining panel, add new panel etc. Fabio ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/126719

[Bug 645679] Re: When attempting to add my Brother HL-5150D printer. several problems are encountered.

2010-09-23 Thread Chazbo
i would be happy to assist resolution of this bug by testing the code fix, as you may not have a duplex/two sided printer available. Just tell me now to get the new code installed by the Synaptic Package Manager and i will be glad to do some test runs. Chazbo -- When attempting to add my

[Bug 646359] [NEW] If a panel is deleted, it is not possible to re-create it under U 10.04

2010-09-23 Thread Chazbo
Public bug reported: I inadvertently deleted a panel and was unable to re-create it under U 10.04. It was necessary to re-install a previous release of Ubuntu, create the panels and then re-update to U 10.04. i use a simple two panel scheme. One panel is for the icons and the other shows the

[Bug 646379] [NEW] U 10.04 Icon problems

2010-09-23 Thread Chazbo
Public bug reported: The Connection Established icon has three problems. 1. It shows as unconnected wire to a wall jack, rather than one that is connected! 2. The icon does not follow the principle of Exception Reporting, ie. only use an eye catching icon when there is a

[Bug 645679] [NEW] When attempting to add my Brother HL-5150D printer. several problems are encountered.

2010-09-22 Thread Chazbo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brother-cups-wrapper-laser1 Using U 10.04 and Brother Printer H:-5150D When attempting to add my Brother HL-5150D printer. several problems are encountered. 1. Using System/Administration/Printing/Add, after the driver is searched for and

[Bug 645695] [NEW] Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors are highlighted correctly.

2010-09-22 Thread Chazbo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit Thank You for your much needed help. Chazbo ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gedit spelling -- Gedit 2.30.3 does not highlight the first spelling error found. Subsequent spelling errors

[Bug 630498] Re: U 10.04 Brother Printer model HL-5150D Duplex Printing does not work

2010-09-22 Thread Chazbo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 645679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645679 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 645679 When attempting to add my Brother HL-5150D printer. several problems are encountered. * You can subscribe to bug 645679 by following this link:

[Bug 630498] [NEW] U 10.04 Brother Printer model HL-5150D Duplex Printing does not work

2010-09-04 Thread Chazbo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brother-lpr-drivers-laser1 U 10.04 Version 1.0.0-3 of the brother-lpr-drivers-laser1 has an option to activate duplex printing. When the option is selected, two sided printing does not occur. ** Affects: brother-lpr-drivers-laser1 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 117642] Re: gnome-btdownload: errors should not suspend downloads

2010-07-14 Thread Chazbo
** Changed in: gnome-btdownload (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- gnome-btdownload: errors should not suspend downloads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs