[Bug 1682193] Re: Mouse acceleration significantly reduced after upgrade to 17.04

2017-04-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
** Package changed: ubuntu => xinput (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1682193 Title: Mouse acceleration significantly reduced after upgrade to 17.04 To manage notifications

[Bug 1682193] [NEW] Mouse acceleration significantly reduced after upgrade to 17.04

2017-04-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: My external Logitech USB mouse was behaving nicely under 16.10 but after upgrade to 17.04 it has slowed down to a crawl. Settings slidebars are set at the maximum acceleration, but it only affects the touch pad, the mouse is extremely slow. ** Affects: ubuntu

[Bug 1119842] Re: [ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. G75VX] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2013-07-11 Thread Daniel Cardin
Hello Anthony, I have the same problem as everyone else, and the new driver is not working for me either... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1119842 Title: [ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.

Re: [Bug 442078] Re: Buttons in Eclipse not working correctly with GTK+ 2.18.1-1

2013-04-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
Not relevant to me anymore. I would suggest closing it Le vendredi 12 avril 2013 à 08:06 +, Ma Xiaojun a écrit : Is this still a problem? Since GTK+ already entered 3.0 era. ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 667441] Re: ubuntu 10.10 dell_laptop module disables wifi

2010-11-17 Thread Daniel Cardin
great news for anyone following that post. I have upgraded the BIOS to A08 and now wireless works as before. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- ubuntu 10.10 dell_laptop module disables wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667441 You received this bug notification

[Bug 667441] [NEW] ubuntu 10.10 dell_laptop module disables wifi

2010-10-27 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: This is new to 10.10. In 10.04, wireless was working just fine. I am reporting against dell_laptop because everything else works fine. Wireless DOES work using wicd, even though nm-applet is reporting it disabled. I can only assume it's not a problem with the broadcom

[Bug 667441] Re: ubuntu 10.10 dell_laptop module disables wifi

2010-10-27 Thread Daniel Cardin
-- ubuntu 10.10 dell_laptop module disables wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667441 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 644452] Re: Atheros AR928X not connecting on wireless HP G60-468CA

2010-10-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
Why would I do that ? The driver works just fine. I have been using it all day with wicd. It's only the killswitch status that prevents network-manager from doing its job. If there were an option to diregard the status, it would work :) De: Cypher2 nathanel.tit...@gmail.com À: Daniel Cardin

Re: [Bug 644452] Re: Atheros AR928X not connecting on wireless HP G60-468CA

2010-10-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
Well, I don't think the rfkill status is related to the driver. It is an interaction with the bios as far as I know... But thanks for your input :) De: Cypher2 nathanel.tit...@gmail.com À: Daniel Cardin daniel.car...@gmail.com Envoyé: Mardi 12 Octobre 2010 09:31:30 Objet: Re: [Bug 644452

[Bug 644452] Re: Atheros AR928X not connecting on wireless HP G60-468CA

2010-10-11 Thread Daniel Cardin
I have a fresh install of 10.10 and I am experimenting the disabled wireless problem as well. But, on my Dell Vostro 1720, I cannot change the state of the rfkill using unblock all. It remains blocked. On the other hand, the wireless IS working as using wicd works just fine, where NM fails.

[Bug 442078] Re: Buttons in Eclipse not working correctly with GTK+ 2.18.1-1

2009-10-26 Thread Daniel Cardin
I agree with Cos Costa. It hurts the perception. I have a bunch of developers here that I'm trying to convince to switch to Ubuntu. The ones who have made the switch are running Jaunty at the moment and I'll have to coach them about this problem. It should work out of the box. -- Buttons in

[Bug 441161] Re: [karmic][iwlagn][dell-wifi] MASTER wireless disabled for IWL 3945 4965 5100 and 5300 devices if booted with killswitch/rfkill enabled

2009-10-15 Thread Daniel Cardin
With kernel 2.6.31.14 #47 the patches to the dell-laptop module have been committed and will probably fix the problem for many of you. I suggest you remove module dell-laptop-dkms for those of you who have installed it, and try upgrading to the new kernel. Discussions about this are in bug

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-14 Thread Daniel Cardin
Mario: Ok let's assume there is a BIOS bug. I would still have one last request for you. I suggest we pick the lesser of two evils and always have the driver respond the wireless is available. it _will_ cause problems if Karmic is released with a default mode of operation which prevents users

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-14 Thread Daniel Cardin
Mario: Thanks for the time you spent fixing this. It is very important IMHO that dell is well supported at release time. It was a crippling bug without a workaround. Good job! -- [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
This it not yet working with Vostro 1720 either using #44+lp430809v3 + dell-laptop-dkms 0.2 Mario, I can give you both dmesg outputs booting on or off if you want. But what strikes me as the first difference is that rfkill lists a device hci0 if booting with the switch in the on position. 1:

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
Mario: I know this build was targetting Janne, but I tested it. Still exhibits the same problem. On another note, is the new build 2.6.31-13.45 really including the lp430809v3 patch? I would assume so from the description, but I want to make absolutely sure for the next tests. -- [Dell Latitude

Re: [Bug 394663] Re: hal-system-smbios --st_wlan reports rfkill switch always on, nm-applet always disabled (wireless, dell laptops)

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
I closed my report because I am now following the development for the Karmic branch. You might want to have a look at bug 430809 -- hal-system-smbios --st_wlan reports rfkill switch always on, nm-applet always disabled (wireless, dell laptops) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394663 You

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
I sent them to your gmail address... I am reluctant to pollute the bug here. But if that's what you want, I will. -- [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430809 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 448074] Re: Dell Vostro 1720 wireless switch's state incorrect

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 430809 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430809 follow bug 430809 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 430809 [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch -- Dell Vostro 1720 wireless switch's state

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
** Attachment added: dmesg.on.atboot.v3 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33604831/dmesg.on.atboot.v3 -- [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
** Attachment added: dmesg.off.atboot.v3 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33604857/dmesg.off.atboot.v3 -- [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
The dmesg outputs are done on kernel 2.6.31-13 #45 with dell-laptop-dkms 0.3 -- [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
Libsmbios version : 2.2.13 smbios-wireless-ctl version : 2.2.13 Wireless Info: Hardware switch supported Hardware switch is Off WiFi Locator not supported Wireless Keyboard not supported NVRAM Size: 256 bytes NVRAM format version: 1 Radio Status for

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
I wonder though why would the switch work perfectly if I boot in the off position first. The situation is as follows : boot with switch in the off position: -- wireless and bluetooth follow the switch state boot with switch in the on position : -- bluetooth follows the switch state --

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
Yup... same thing. Wireless Info: Hardware switch supported Hardware switch is Off WiFi Locator not supported Wireless Keyboard not supported NVRAM Size: 256 bytes NVRAM format version: 1 This is booting with the switch off, and then turning it on.

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
Mario: What is different if I boot with the switch off then ? How does nm-applet and the rest make it work ? What's different? another way to put it, how was it working in hal in jaunty prior to v4 IIRC ? There has to be something... Otherwise I wouldn't be online at the moment through

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-13 Thread Daniel Cardin
Is it because nm-applet uses rfkill's underlying mechanism ? rfkill reports with switch on : 0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 1: dell-bluetooth: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 2: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no

[Bug 430809] Re: [Dell Latitude D430, iwl3945] Wireless can't be activated after disabling kill switch

2009-10-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
Dell Vostro 1720 with #lp430809v3 + DKMS v4. I can feel it's getting close... Now wireless works properly IF and only IF I boot with the killswitch off. So this is progress for me, but it falls into the bug 441161 now. When I boot with the killswitch on, the logic seems reversed meaning that the

[Bug 441161] Re: [karmic][iwlagn][dell-wifi] MASTER wireless disabled for IWL 3945 4965 5100 and 5300 devices if booted with killswitch/rfkill enabled

2009-10-12 Thread Daniel Cardin
I have installed #lp430809v3 + DKMS v4 and I can feel it's getting close... Now wireless works properly IF and only IF I boot with the killswitch off. So this is progress for me, but it falls into the bug 441161 now. When I boot with the killswitch on, the logic seems reversed meaning that the

[Bug 441161] Re: [karmic][iwlagn][dell-wifi] MASTER wireless disabled for IWL 3945 4965 5100 and 5300 devices if booted with killswitch/rfkill enabled

2009-10-11 Thread Daniel Cardin
I have a Dell Vostro 1720 with a BCM4322 running wl on kernel 2.6.31-13 and it still exhibits the problem. 0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes 1: dell-bluetooth: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: yes 2: hci0: Bluetooth Soft

Re: [Bug 441161] Re: [karmic][iwlagn][dell-wifi] MASTER wireless disabled for IWL 3945 4965 5100 and 5300 devices if booted with killswitch/rfkill enabled

2009-10-11 Thread Daniel Cardin
with Leann's latest kernel? uname -a should have #44+lp430809v3 in it. On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 18:54, Daniel Cardin daniel.car...@gmail.comwrote: I have a Dell Vostro 1720 with a BCM4322 running wl on kernel 2.6.31-13 and it still exhibits the problem. 0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft

[Bug 448074] Re: Dell Vostro 1720 wireless switch's state incorrect

2009-10-10 Thread Daniel Cardin
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33409877/Dependencies.txt -- Dell Vostro 1720 wireless switch's state incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 448074] [NEW] Dell Vostro 1720 wireless switch's state incorrect

2009-10-10 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hal There have been many problems with the switch detection. But un Jaunty I have been able to make wireless properly by not upgrading the hal package, but since Karmic, network-manager cannot be used anymore. This is a major problem, because I cannot

[Bug 390449] Re: New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver)

2009-10-10 Thread Daniel Cardin
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390449 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 382836] Re: Headphone jack-sense not working with Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03)

2009-07-28 Thread Daniel Cardin
Thanks Davide, I have indeed done the same thing, going to 1.0.20. I believe a backport would have been the good thing to do so current users who do not know how to upgrade ALSA can still benefit from the fixes. -- Headphone jack-sense not working with Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family)

[Bug 390449] Re: New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver)

2009-06-22 Thread Daniel Cardin
I have tracked the source of the problem to bug #368553. So this bug can be closed if 368553 is reverted to in progress. -- New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390449 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 382836] Re: Headphone jack-sense not working with Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03)

2009-06-22 Thread Daniel Cardin
Is there a workaround for Jaunty ? backport ? -- Headphone jack-sense not working with Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 390449] [NEW] New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver)

2009-06-21 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: On Jaunty, fully updated: After an upgrade to package hal was performed -- from (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu1) to (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) -- on my Dell Vostro 1720, wireless stopped working. Symptoms: network manager reports wireless is disabled, shows no

[Bug 368553] Re: [jaunty] [TYPO in script - missing quote] line 81: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `' /usr/lib/hal/scripts/linux/hal-system-killswitch-get-power-linux: line 84: syntax erro

2009-06-21 Thread Daniel Cardin
Gerhard, I have submitted a bug report for the same problem you have encountered and can also confirm the problem lies with the last update to hal. You can force a specific version in synaptic using the ctrl-e key on the specific package. It will provide you with a dropdown list of the two

[Bug 155852] Re: Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Cardin
bump. this is still the case with Jaunty -- Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 220278] Re: maximized windows unresponsive [hardy]

2008-04-22 Thread Daniel Cardin
The new compiz update fixes the issue. Thanks! ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- maximized windows unresponsive [hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220278 You received this bug

[Bug 220278] [NEW] maximized windows unresponsive [hardy]

2008-04-21 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: I am setup with an nvidia 8400m gs card, using the latest drivers 169.12, dual screen in separate X configurations. In my primary desktop, if I maximize a window, it becomes unresponsive, mouse and keyboard events are held back. resuming the window size, the events are

[Bug 220278] Re: maximized windows unresponsive [hardy]

2008-04-21 Thread Daniel Cardin
Definitely related to compiz. When I select no effects, things work correctly. -- maximized windows unresponsive [hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 155852] Re: Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection

2008-04-16 Thread Daniel Cardin
I am trying to find information about this but it's very scarce. I think I will have to look at the actual source code for the launcher. I can only tell you the actual behavior for now. If the directory has the right name, java picks it up. -- Installation of the package breaks automatic

[Bug 155852] Re: Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection

2008-04-16 Thread Daniel Cardin
It documents the option's format, not the actual process of locating the jvm though. that's what I'm looking for -- Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 157864] Re: Works in xine, but not in totem

2007-11-07 Thread Daniel Cardin
why is it on incomplete ? I have uploaded the video. If there are more questions, feel free to ask. Thanks -- Works in xine, but not in totem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 157864] Re: Works in xine, but not in totem

2007-10-29 Thread Daniel Cardin
I will try attaching the file. The video sync is not correct. It sort of displays but not properly. Sound is correct. ** Attachment added: the problematic video file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10205034/wake-up.wmv -- Works in xine, but not in totem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157864

[Bug 157864] Works in xine, but not in totem

2007-10-27 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem this is my first submission through totem, I hope there is some info attached. but there is a wmv that plays in xine and not in totem, the video is distorted. Should this be submitted? ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 27 15:31:08

[Bug 157864] Re: Works in xine, but not in totem

2007-10-27 Thread Daniel Cardin
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10188001/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10188002/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10188003/ProcStatus.txt -- Works in

[Bug 155852] Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection

2007-10-22 Thread Daniel Cardin
Public bug reported: the ubuntu packages for java install to /usr/lib/jvm using a pattern like this : java-6-sun (symlink) java-6-sun-1.6.0.03 However, proper jvm detection is done using the pattern jdkVERSION jreVERSION Second problem, the directory is named [...].0.03 where the convention