Jörn, thanks for your response! I welcome your fix, although I still
believe there is an underlying issue. Mainly because I have tested
discs that worked fine in Jaunty however have the problems stated above
when done in Karmic. Again, every test I have done thus far in Karmic
still yields a
gray, send me an email. I don't want to turn this bug report into a
forum thread ;). I'll be glad to help you, just email me,..
l...@digitalenigma.net
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification
Alessio, bug still says it needs forwarding to upstream. Unless I am
missing something.
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Ok, yeah, I just found out from his website that he does not use
launchpad to track bugs. Thanks.
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
gray, sounds like a PSU issue. Did/do you have PSU core enabled?
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Thanks, although not critical, it would be nice to see a fix. It has to
be something really simple.
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Reading the posts above, is there now a working patch for this? If so,
will an updated package be available via the repositories any time soon?
--
gnome-screensaver not functioning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Has any progress been made on this?
--
gnome-screensaver not functioning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
This maybe a transcode bug on how it relays its progress back to
dvd::rip. However, I'd need a perl expert to prove this.
** Package changed: dvdrip (Ubuntu) = transcode (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: dvdrip
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: dvdrip
Status: New =
Perhaps I'll file a bug with the dvd::rip maintainer...
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Agreed, I think a regression would be in order due to the security
implications related to this. I currently have to start the screensaver
manually and then use xset from my Mac to shutdown the displays
remotely.
--
gnome-screensaver not functioning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411350
You
I also found something interesting as well while transcoding. Say your
rip stops at 72.34%. When you transcode, it will complete a pass at
100% plus the delta missing from the rip. In other words
(100-72.34)+100=127.66% which it the completion time for transcode on a
single pass. This is more
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/dvdrip
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Ok scratch the workaround ... I've confirmed that dvd::rip is just not
computing the progress right. See my initial reasoning for filing this
bug. If you rip with it, when it locks up, save your project and the
close it out. Then open up the first VOB and last VOB with VLC; you
should have a
So far it seems transcode is working as it should for me. I have a few
more tests to run on my workaround before I post it. I do however get
those same seg fault errors, but the resulting encoded file seems to
function properly. Could this possibly be another bug specific to
transcode?
--
Just attempted with Lucid's version of transcode (1.1.5 -- latest) and
it bombed out with the same results.
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I think I may have found a plausible workaround for this issue by using
CLI for just the rip process and the dvd::rip GUI for the rest of the
project. Currently preforming a few tests to validate. I will post my
findings if they prove to be accurate.
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of
Dev team, is there anything we can do or anything we can provide you to
assist in facilitating a fix for this issue?
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Mine is still random. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Still
view this as a security vulnerability.
--
gnome-screensaver not functioning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've done the math and the actual rip process bails out at ~95% of the
title length resulting in a none complete rip. This also leads me to
believe dvd::rip is getting a false progress rate echoed back to it from
the sub command called upon to do the actual rip or dvd::rip itself
cannot compute
Marked this confirmed since PenquinCoder is experiencing the same
problem. Was beginning to think I was alone ... :(
** Changed in: dvdrip (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received
Is there anything else I can do to assist in isolating this issue?
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Is there anything else I can do to assist in isolating this issue?
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I ran some updates including the proposed repositories and thus far, it
seems like the issue has corrected itself ... I'm not going to call it
just yet, although so far the screensaver has started when it should and
the displays have shutdown when they should. I will continue to monitor
for a few
Well, strike that previous post ... problem is back ... :(
--
gnome-screensaver not functioning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411350
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Doh, looks like valgrind is not pre-compiled for sparc architecture. Is
there another alternative?
http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/valgrind
I suppose I could compile and install myself if needed.
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
Hmm...seems like I can't compile either...
checking for a supported CPU... no (sparc64)
configure: error: Unsupported host architecture. Sorry
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = New
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Changing back to 'dvdrip' since, well, it's obviously not performing as
it should. :(
** Package changed: transcode (Ubuntu) = dvdrip (Ubuntu)
--
dvd::rip does not complete ripping of disc via gui in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478710
You received this bug notification because you
Is there a way to add an option in gdm.conf to tell gdm which display is
the primary (that it should appear on)?
--
gdm 2.26 appears on wrong monitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Doh, looks like valgrind is not pre-compiled for sparc architecture. Is
there another alternative?
http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/valgrind
I suppose I could compile and install myself if needed.
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
Hmm...seems like I can't compile either...
checking for a supported CPU... no (sparc64)
configure: error: Unsupported host architecture. Sorry
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = New
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
It appears this is a problem with dvd::rip v0.98.10. If anyone else can
confirm this, then I would recommend a regression back to dvd::rip
v0.98.9 since this had minimal to no problems that I saw and at least I
could actually rip a full DVD with v0.98.9. To date, I have not yet
gotten on DVD to
Update: I now believe it is an issue with transcode and not dvd::rip. I
just made an attempt with dvd::rip v0.98.9 and it still failed. So I re-
installed dvd::rip v0.98.10 and am now attempting with transcode v1.0.7
(Jaunty's version). I will update the bug to reflect my findings.
** Package
Ok, failed again ... :( At this point I am unsure as to what is causing
this. My best guess is a library or something that transcode depends
on. I am 99% sure dvd::rip is not the problem nor is transcode, but
some dependency is causing this. I am stumped at this point and hope
someone with
You can also just install the Jaunty packages natively since libstdc++5
does not exist. Upgrading to Karmic broke my light-scribe which
required the 32 bit libs and I have a 64 bit system. So, I did the
following as a workaround.
mkdir /tmp/libstdc++5
cd /tmp/libstdc++5
wget
Public bug reported:
I have found that I cannot get any disc to complete when ripping in
Karmic. The process gets to about 70-80% and just locks up. No errors,
nothing, just a dead window. I used to have this issue with a few
random discs in Jaunty, however modifying and executing the commands
I've discovered upon a fresh reboot, if you do not touch gconf at all
and let the system idle. The first instance of the screen saver/power
manager appears to work. Over the course of time, the randomness comes
back and is ultimately followed by nothing working at all. Could we be
looking at a
Update, I've copied the rip commands out of the debug window and ran
them via CLI. Mind you that the rip process completes there, however
the title is incomplete and seems get chopped off at the same point as
running with the GUI. I will do some more testing and post back the
actual command
Due to the security issues involved, is it possible to issue a
regression back down to the known working packages from Jaunty until
this can be resolved? As of now, I have to SSH to all affected Karmic
boxes from my iBook and forcibly shut down the displays. If this is not
possible, could
Gathering debug info...
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = In Progress
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Ok, so I just had the screen saver not start on its own after the idle
time out for that expired (twice). It now appears this idle time out
problem is occurring in either gnome-power-manager and/or gnome-
screensaver. Thus, I retract my previous statement about the screen
saver working properly.
I am also having this issue and as stated above, view this as a security
issue as I also require the display to auto lock itself in a timely
manner while I am away from my machines. I opened a bug on this myself
yesterday, however I stumbled across this already on going one.
Therefore, I have
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 411350 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411350
See bug #411350.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 411350
gnome-screensaver not functioning
** Package changed: ubuntu = gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager
Gathering debug info...
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = In Progress
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Also note, I have the random issue. And by that I mean sometimes
nothing works right, sometimes the screen saver works but not the power
manager, and seldom do both work as they should. Also, a litte output
of my settings per gconf...
Power Manager General Options (Defaults)
Tried to install Valgrind but it does not seem to exist in the
repositories. And yes, they are up-2-date. Would this be in a specific
repo?
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package valgrind is not available, but is referred to by
Also, as a band-aid workaround, I have Cron restarting SNMP at midnight
every night to combat this memory issue.
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you are a
Just installed Xvnc4 on hardy (64-bit) and am having this issue as well.
I've even went as far as disabling all plugins in
/apps/gnome_settings_daemon/plugins/ with the result still the same.
I've done a lot of research and it seems this bug is plaguing a lot of
people. Does anyone know if there
Public bug reported:
I've ran some tests and snmptrapd in version 5.4.1 seems to be consuming
system memory much like how snmpd had a memory leak in the previous
release. I have been cron'ing this script every 15 minutes to justify
my findings. I do a lot of trap catching so I'm not sure if
** Attachment added: Complete debug output from my script.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27203817/snmptrapd.debug.dat
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
I've ran some tests and snmptrapd in version 5.4.1 seems to be consuming
system memory much like how snmpd had a memory leak in the previous
release. I have been cron'ing this script every 15 minutes to justify
my findings. I do a lot of trap catching so I'm not sure if
** Attachment added: Complete debug output from my script.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27203817/snmptrapd.debug.dat
--
snmptrapd v5.4.1 seems to have a memory leak much like snmpd in the previous
release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380942
You received this bug notification because you
Well I have successfully updated to Hardy on sparc architecture. Had a
few issues that were somewhat easily solvable. First, I could not get a
virgin install of Gutsy to install (I figured out why later). So I
installed a virgin install of Feisty. I then upgraded to Gutsy at which
time I could
I have a Sun Ultra E2 that I can use as a test system. I will install
Gutsy, update it, setup a few services and then attempt to upgrade it to
Hardy and see how it goes. I will report my findings here once
completed.
--
Getting upgrade prerequisites for system upgrade failed
Hi, I have a Sun E420R running gutsy and as is it approaching EOL, I
would like to upgrade it to hardy so I can get LTS support. However, I
did attempt this once and it had disastrous results. It would seem the
upgrade took, but upon rebooting the server, about half way through the
startup, the
That sounds exactly what my server did. I really wish sparc was still
mainstream supported. I can see why you would do away with ppc, but a
lot of old sun sparc gear is still very useful ;) Guess I will wait
until the EOL day and upgrade then and see what happens.
--
Getting upgrade
101 - 158 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
