Sounds great. Can Alex's patch be included in the next alpha release
(alpha 6) of Karmic? I would like to test it.
--
[Jaunty and Karmic] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the
Ubuntu partition (far too small)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421407
You received this bug
@Glennz nl: this bug is far worse than a mere papercut. This is a bug
that can cause beginners with Linux, to drop Linux straight away and go
back to Windows.
That's why it's urgent to fix it.
--
[Jaunty and Karmic] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the
Ubuntu partition (far
@jgschellinger: why did you change the status in Fix Released? There's
still no 6u16 in the normal updates for Jaunty (Main server).
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
It would be helpful if the package maintainers would react in this
thread. The dialogue between bug reporters and package maintainers is
what makes Launchpad so great. :-)
@cayennep: I suggest you try the manual that drs305 has written:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7875248postcount=3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 421407 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421407
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 421407
[Jaunty and Karmic] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the
Ubuntu partition (far too small)
--
Ubiquity's default new partition size
** Summary changed:
- [Jaunty] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the Ubuntu
partition (far too small)
+ [Jaunty and Karmic] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the
Ubuntu partition (far too small)
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
For
I already suggested a 10 GB default partition size for Ubuntu. Another
option would be a *dynamic* partition size, using the same method that
the Debian installer uses on the Alternate CD.
And there are still other possible options, of course. At this point I'm
not so much interested in exactly
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Jaunty / Karmic side-by-side defaults to 2.3 GB
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 421407 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421407
I've registered this bug report as a duplicate of this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/421407
Not the other way round, because several people have already responded
in 421407. I hope
@drs305: I've confirmed your previous bug report. Also I've tagged it
als a duplicate of this one. Not the other way round, because several
other people have already responded in this thread. I hope you don't
mind. :-)
@everyone: I've contacted the package maintainers of ubiquity. When
they've
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
When installing from the Live CD, the installer in Jaunty proposes a
root partition size for Ubuntu, of only 2,5 GB. Even when there's plenty
of space on a hard disk. This is far too small.
With only 2,5 GB available, you can't install updates
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[Jaunty] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the Ubuntu
partition (far too small)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
- When installing from the Live CD, the installer in Jaunty proposes a
- root partition size for Ubuntu, of only 2,5 GB. Even when there's plenty
- of space on a hard disk. This is far too small.
+ For beginners with Linux, the most
- Hardy i386 (32 bit): works fine.
- Jaunty i386 (32 bit) Ubuntu Netbook Remix: works fine.
Thanks! :-)
One last question: are there no updates for Intrepid?
--
sun-java6 6b16 update for karmic, hardy and jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420426
You received this bug notification
@John Vivirito:
While I can understand that as a general practice, this case should be
an exception.
Security is at stake here. Probably millions are using an insecure JRE
right now, and don't know it. The least we can do, is to prevent new
victims.
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
It appears that nobody is both able and willing to take this task upon
himself... Well, it's a volunteer job ofcourse, so I don't blame anyone.
However, this being so, I urgently request that JRE will be removed
entirely from the repositories of Hardy, Intrepid and Jaunty. JRE is
much too widely
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Ubiquity's default new partition size is too small, particularly for netbooks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
@Jamie Strandboge:
Most of the options you mention are above my head, I'm sorry
The thing is, that most Ubuntu desktop users won't know about the need
for a manual update of JRE. I've done it already, my machines are
secure. But I'm an exception.
May I therefore suggest two other possible
@Jamie Strandboge:
I understand your point, but where does that leave me, a simple end user with
no packaging skills at all? And more than half a million like me? Probably even
millions, if you count out the distortion from the popcon statistics?
This means that probably the vast majority of
@Matthias Klose:
But 6u15 *is* sufficient. Because Sun says in the Release Notes, that 6u16
doesn't contain security updates compared with 6u15:
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u16.html
Essential quote:
Bug Fixes
This feature release does not contain any new fixes for security
@Matthias Klose: please react to the questions that I asked you. It's a
vital matter. Thanks in advance.
@everyone: maybe we should consider mobilizing our LoCo Teams. I could
try to persuade the leadership of my LoCo Team, Ubuntu-NL (Netherlands
and Belgium) to put an official collective request
It's not possible for me, to pick up the discussion in the MOTU mailing
list. Probably because I'm not a MOTU myself. I can only post by sending
an e-mail to the janitor. That way, I can't react in a topic thread.
The MOTU's aren't responding. I'm running out of options here... Much to
my dismay.
@Matthias Klose and Marc Deslauriers:
The updated Sun Java JRE packages are *already* present in Multiverse,
right now only for Karmic. They only need to be made available for
Hardy, Intrepid and Jaunty as well. No extra work needed.
This JRE update works fine in Hardy, Intrepid and Jaunty,
Thanks feranick. I posted the following message on the MOTU mailing
list:
Hello,
Hereby I request your attention for the following matter. It concerns
Multiverse and not Universe, but the matter is grave enough to bring
this to your attention.
Sun Java JRE doesn't receive
Why don't the responsible package maintainers answer here? Isn't
Launchpad meant for contacting them?
Why this silence on this important security issue? :-(
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
It's utterly unacceptable that the responsible package maintainer
doesn't react here. I suggest that those of us who are Ubuntu Members,
discuss this matter on a higher level of authority.
This matter needs to be dealt with: this negligence by the package
maintainer, is putting many computers at
@ Jamie Strandboge:
Thanks for your reaction.
OpenJDK still can't replace JRE entirely. There are still some websites
that only function well for a visitor, when that visitor has JRE
installed. A pity, but that's how it is. And that's why we need security
updates for JRE.
All that has to be
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@feranick: I appreciate your efforts with the PPA. But fix released
does not apply here, I think.
Fix released would be, when the *package maintainer* would make these
packages available through the normal Multiverse updates for Hardy,
Intrepid and Jaunty.
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
You can apply a workaround to install the new JRE which is meant for
Karmic, in Hardy, Intrepid and Jaunty.
This workaround is for 32-bit Ubuntu only! You have to adapt it for a 64
bit system.
1. Manually download these three files from Multiverse:
Bin:
Repost, this time without tags that don't work (sorry!):
You can apply a workaround to install the new JRE which is meant for
Karmic, in Hardy, Intrepid and Jaunty.
This workaround is for 32-bit Ubuntu only! You have to adapt it for a 64
bit system.
1. Manually download these three files from
On my openSUSE 11.1 box, I received the 1.6.0_15 update yesterday
When will Ubuntu follow? I have six Ubuntu boxes in my house...
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Please update quickly. Also for Hardy: VLC is still 0.8.6e in Ubuntu
8.04 LTS!
Security holes should be fixed as soon as possible. This is not
acceptable.
--
Please update VLC to version 1.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Additional thought:
VLC is a Multiverse package, and Multiverse packages are treated differently
from the rest.
But when a package is as widely used as VLC, nearly everyone installs
it, it shouldn't be left to the PPA to provide security updates.
** This bug has been flagged as a security
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
kernel does not detect card reader if card is inserted in reader before boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271019
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Felipe Yaekel: you can get the DEB packages here:
JRE:
http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/s/sun-java6/sun-java6-bin_6-13-1_i386.deb
Mozilla plugin:
http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/s/sun-java6/sun-java6-plugin_6-13-1_i386.deb
Double-click the deb and it will
Public bug reported:
I have installed the RC of Jaunty Netbook Remix on my Acer Aspire One
150 netbook. The Atheros wireless chipset is recognized automatically,
but is turned off. The only way to turn it on, is by doing this:
gksudo gedit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
Then add the following line
** Attachment added: acer lshw
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25606514/acer%20lshw
--
Acer Aspire One: Atheros wifi only works after blacklisting acer_wmi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362816
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Summary changed:
- Acer Aspire One: Atheros wifi only works after blacklisting acer_wmi
+ Acer Aspire One running on Jaunty: Atheros wifi only works after blacklisting
acer_wmi
** Description changed:
I have installed the RC of Jaunty Netbook Remix on my Acer Aspire One
150 netbook. The
Bump
I would like a reaction from a developer on this matter. This is a grave
and serious security risk.
It seems that Matthias Klose is the main person responsible for this
package. @Matthias Klose: can you give us your reaction?
--
[Hardy] Sun Java JRE 6 badly needs security updates
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
In Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron, sun-java6-jre is still at version 1.6.0_07-b06. Sun
has already released version 1.6.0_13, which contains several critical security
bug fixes. This means, that in Hardy we're already four
When will the .50 kernel appear in proposed? I can only test until april
23, because I will replace 8.04 Hardy by 9.04 Jaunty then, on my Acer
Aspire One. Mainly because the Atheros wireless chipset will work out of
the box in Jaunty.
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One
@Stefan Bader: thanks for keeping us informed. I'm glad that this
upcoming update will probably work... :-)
Can you tell us when -24.50 will be in the normal updates? In other
words: when will this new kernel leave proposed and be issued as a
*normal* update? A rough indication would be nice.
The current kernel in proposed is 2.6.24-23.49 and not 50. Can you
give us a warning in this thread, when 50 has arrived in proposed? I'll
help with testing then.
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322867
You received this bug
This sounds very promising. Thank you, Till Kamppeter! :-)
--
[Feisty, Gutsy] MASTER: HP LaserJet 1000/1005/1018/1020 don't work because of
missing firmware
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Great! Thanks, iouri!
I certainly hope that this emergency measure will not be necessary for
long. Something like this really shouldn't happen in a mature LTS
version like Hardy. And if it does happen, it should be fixed with great
speed.
Stefan Bader, can you give us an indication when it will
@iouri: your command doesn't work for me, because my apt cache is
flushed empty after each succesful installation. Nothing in the cache,
therefore.
Where can I get linux-image-2.6.24-23-generic_2.6.24-23.46_i386.deb now?
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
To make my previous message complete: the kernel version in the 8.04.2
point release, which worked fine on my AAO before the updates which
appeared several days *after* January 22, is not 23-46-generic but
24-23-generic.
So mine was not an upgraded kernel.
--
Kernel panic after update to
I did a clean installation of 8.04.2 (the second point release of Hardy,
which appeared on January 22). This worked fine, until I applied the
available updates, which caused the kernel panic.
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
Here is a screenshot of the kernel panic on my machine (perhaps a little
more readable than Mike's).
** Attachment added: aa0.JPG
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21875801/aa0.JPG
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322867
You
Booting with acpi=off fails sometimes on my Acer Aspire One. Usually
it goes well, but approximately every fifth boot results in the same
kernel panic.
So acpi=off works about 80 % of the time for me, but not always.
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
I have the same problem on my Acer Aspire One. Booting with acpi=off
solves the problem, thank God! :-)
--
Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aircrack-ng
Aircrack-ng is primarily a burglary tool and has no place in Universe.
It should be removed as soon as possible.
The presence of this burglary tool in a well-respected and important
repository, is a shame and contrary to the ideals of
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[Intrepid] Atheros ath5k wireless driver not enabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
The Atheros ath5k wireless driver should be enabled by default! Please
reverse this wrong decision.
Many first-time Ubuntu users will give up on Ubuntu, because of this.
Their interests should weigh more heavily than the interests of
upgraders with a manually installed
Public bug reported:
In Ubuntu 8.10 it's impossible to adjust screen brightness on my laptop.
Both with screen brightness applet and with Power Manager.
This is a regression: in Ubuntu 8.04 this works fine.
** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
In Ubuntu 8.10 security updates aren't enabled by default; I had to
check that box (intrepid-security) manually in Software Sources -
Updates. Only intrepid-updates were enabled by default (box was
checked).
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
I used the Release Candidate from the Desktop CD of Intrepid Ibex, to
install 8.10 on my laptop (which already has 8.04 installed).
This failed, because Ubiquity (the installer) failed to install Grub.
The laptop has only one hard disk.
** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
I can confirm the problem. Please repair this quickly: it looks so bad
in a LTS version. And many computers are affected, because this is a
very common wireless chipset.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug
I disagree. The administrative user should have all rights by default.
By definition.
In a few cases this could even be essential, so there's practical
relevance as well.
--
do not put desktop users into fax, tape, scanner groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188759
You received this bug
Today I tested the newest version in proposed. The problem seems largely
fixed, but not quite.
When I check the system load caused by gnome-system-monitor using the
command top in the terminal, the CPU load is almost imperceptible.
That's good.
But when I check the system load by double-clicking
Version 2.22.3 is still plagued by the bug. In a completely up-to-date
Ubuntu 8.04.1.
CPU usage is mostly at 11 % (sometimes it drops for a second to 0 % or 1
%), with peaks as high as 22 %. On my Intel Core 2 Duo machine with 2
GB RAM This is crazy.
Memory usage is acceptable though:
Public bug reported:
The administrator now doesn't by default have rights over scanners and
tapedrives. That's not right, because that causes certain unnecessary
problems with printers and scanners. Low-level USB rights are necessary
for the administrator, by default.
The workaround is to do
Public bug reported:
In Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron there is a new phenomenon. Suddenly, after a
kernel update, I am asked what to do with the old menu.lst. The wrong
choice is offered by default: namely to keep the old menu.lst. That is
very wrong, because then the new kernel isn't added to the
Unfortunately, many beginners do change their menu.lst, namely by
installing and using startupmanager. They set Windows as default boot
option
Furthermore, the only change that a kernel update makes to the menu.lst,
is rewriting the Automagic part of the menu.lst. Manual changes to the
Thanks for discussing this with me. Well, there are two reasons why I'm
not happy with the new system:
1. Making sure that Ubuntu users normally use the latest kernel is
absolutely essential for security. That should be the number 1 priority:
an outdated kernel could be a security risk.
2. I
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
A user is sometimes presented with a highly undesirable and insecure
default option in a popup window, after a kernel update. He is namely
being asked what he wants to do with the old menu.lst, and the proposed
answer
For me, the problem has disappeared. Probably thanks to the recent
series of updates. :-)
--
[hardy] shutdown problems since the first two updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Unfortunately I can't get my hands on the laptop with the Intel 945
graphics chip until the end of next month. The owner is abroad.
I hope the fix will be in 8.04.1, though
--
Hardy - severe graphical issues with i945GM graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204065
You received this bug
The problem has disappeared. I suppose the last couple of updates have
something to do with that. :-)
--
login screen often doesn't accept a correct password until the third attempt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bryce Harrington:
But one needs a viewable screen to begin with To do anything at all
How can I download and install a possible fix for testing purposes, when
I have no viewable screen to start with?
--
Hardy - severe graphical issues with i945GM graphics
In my case, urlclassifier3.sqlite had grown to 33 MB in a couple of
days. Then I switched off the phishing / attack warnings alltogether.
Although the problem is greatly diminished since the xulrunner update,
this security function still eats up too much resources (occasional high
CPU load plus
I can confirm both the improvement because of the patch, and the
remaining hugely diminished problem.
Oh well, I have simply disabled the warning for attack websites. Who
cares anyway, all they attack is Windows machines. :-)
--
[MASTER] Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite causes
Public bug reported:
A strange phenomenon since a couple of days: Ubuntu often reports a
wrong password in the login screen. Mostly I need three or four attempts
before login is succesful.
I type my password deliberately extra slowly and accurately, so I've
made sure that it's not an error of
The problem is no longer there in Xubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron. Happy now.
:-)
--
[Xubuntu 7.10] keyboard delay when typing text. Result: missing letters.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164346
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Today (10 hours ago), I repeated the testing with xulrunner in proposed,
instead of xulrunner from upstream (after applying Alexander Sack's
instruction: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/215728/comments/94
Again, no problems after a day of intensive web surfing.
*Please* don't wait any
Still testing (over a day now) and still no problems. This update really
works. Good job! :-)
--
[MASTER] Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite causes excessive CPU usage and
disk I/O
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215728
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@Alexander Sack:
If I understand you correctly, you would like us to test a possible fix for
this bug. If so, could you provide us with direct links to the packages in
question (32-bit and 64-bit)? I can't find my way on the link page that you
gave.
By the way: why do you think that xulrunner
@Alexander Sack and Chris Coulson:
I get this error message from the system when I apt-get update with the
addition of the line https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive; in muy
sources list:
@thuiscomputer:~$ sudo apt-get update
[sudo] password for :
E: Type
OK. Updates applied and testing started. I will report back in a day or
so.
Bedankt, Sander! :-)
--
[MASTER] Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite causes excessive CPU usage and
disk I/O
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215728
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Intermediate report, in view of the critical importance of this bug
(show stopper).
After more than an hour of intensive surfing, with the warning for
attack sites turned on (default configuration): no more problems. :-)
However, urlclassifier3.sqlite has grown from 0,009 MB to 9,6 MB. Is
this
Public bug reported:
The first two updates of Hardy Heron final, have done something bad to
my shutdown process. It hangs for 20 seconds, then displays some errors
regarding shutdwon of Network Manager, then finally shuts down.
Before those two updates everything worked fine.
** Affects: ubuntu
I think it can be considered as fixed. A couple of hours more of
intensive browsing and no problems at all. :-)
Please roll out this update very quickly. It's extremely damaging for
the reputation of Ubuntu, especially for an LTS-version.
One remark: urlclassifier3.sqlite has grown to 18,8 MB.
There is an easy workaround.
This workaround is successful:
1. Open Firefox 3
2. Disable phishing/attack detection in the security section of the Preferences
3. Close Firefox
4. Make hidden files visible (Locations - Personal folder - View - show hidden
files)
5. Delete
Public bug reported:
At intervals, Firefox 3 beta 5 shows high CPU load (up to 100 % on my
Intel Core 2 Duo machine with 2 GB RAM), coupled with intense hard drive
activity.
This lasts a minute or two, then stops. Every 10 minutes or so, it
happens again.
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Confirmed for a clean installation of Hardy final. Can this be fixed in
8.04.1?
--
[hardy] gdmsetup cause intensive disk activity and take a very long time to open
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I recommend closure.
All persons who reported this problem on the Dutch Ubuntu forum, prior
to the final release, now report that all is well. The kernel update and
the HAL update of april 22 seem to have repaired this fault.
That was a close call, by the way. Two days before final release
I recommend strongly a clean installation of the final version of Hardy
Heron. Clean and fresh, so with previous formatting of the partition.
In a couple of hours the final version of Hardy will be available for
download..
I expect that you won't see these problems anymore then.
Greetz, Pjotr.
Great! It would be very nice if this patch would be available in the
final version of 8.04. There is still time :-)
--
Hardy - severe graphical issues with i945GM graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I have found a perhaps better solution, at least for 32-bit-Ubuntu.
The thing is, that Sun Java JRE is no longer in ubuntu-restricted-
extras. It has been replaced by OpenJDK and the Icedtea plugin. But
those don't work as well as Sun Java.
These are the steps I followed:
1. I installed
@pbhj:
Blackdown java is outdated, less functional and probably unsafe (unpatched).
Why don't you choose Sun Java 6 JRE and plugin? Fully safe, up to date and
functional. Simply follow this instruction for Ubuntu 8.04:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/173966/comments/59
--
@ Timo Aaltonen:
But it definitely is a bug in the intel driver (xserver-xorg-video-intel).
It's even confirmed by upstream:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15512
It would be great if the final release of Ubuntu 8.04 would contain the
fixed Intel driver.
--
Hardy - severe
I forgot to add: upstream has already fixed the intel driver for this
particular bug. So all you have to do is use the new driver.
--
Hardy - severe graphical issues with i945GM graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@Bryce Harrington: The problem is still there in the intel driver that
is in the Release Candidate of Ubuntu 8.04. I have informed upstream
about it and I have sent them a copy of Xorg.0.log (from the LiveCD-
session).
Probably unnecessary, but I have attached a copy of Xorg.0.log to this
message
Also confirmed with a clean installation of Hardy Release Candidate.
I hope this will be fixed in time for the final release.
--
[hardy] gdmsetup cause intensive disk activity and take a very long time to open
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204770
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
OpenJDK doesn't work as good as Sun Java JRE. For example, I can't play
chess on Yahoo Games with OpenJDK and the Icedtea plugin.
I had to completely remove OpenJDK (and Icedtea plugin) and install Sun
Java JRE and plugin. Now everything works fine again.
Please put Sun
@Bruce Harrington:
My acquaintance, the owner of the laptop, has installed your deb file:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/bisect/xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.2.0+git20080318.ac763634-1_i386.deb
(thus undoing the previous removal of the xserver-xorg-video-intel driver).
He reports no problems. I
Bryce,
I hope I can get my hands on it The laptop with the Intel 945 chip
is not mine. It belongs to an acquaintance who lives some 50 kilometres
from where I live. However, I will do my best.
--
Hardy - severe graphical issues with i945GM graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204065
You
@Bryce Harrington:
I've contacted upstream in the thread that you suggested to mykrob.
--
Hardy - severe graphical issues with i945GM graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu 8.04 is going to be so good, so stable, so user friendly And
on top of that, it'll be an LTS release, with three years of security
updates
This is the one, people! The one that will blast it's way into the
computing world. The (almost) flawless one. And we can help to make this
301 - 400 of 525 matches
Mail list logo
