[Bug 1682732] Re: package python3-xapian (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/xapian/__init__.py', which is also in package python3-xapian1.3

Below, I am providing my fix using dpkg. (Please disregard any additional output that you will see from etckeeper, needrestart, etc.; also, I have APT::Install-Recommends "0" and APT::Install-Suggests "0") Maybe the solution is as easy as adding a "Replaces: python3-xapian1.3" or "Breaks:

[Bug 1665453] [NEW] Upgrade to 4.8.0-37.39 from Yakkety

Public bug reported: When will this package be upgraded to the most recent stable kernel from Yakkety? http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux/linux_4.8.0-37.39/changelog I think I am hitting the following bug every other day on my hypervisor. - mm, oom: stop pre-mature

[Bug 1546641] Re: unity-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in up_exported_daemon_get_lid_is_closed()

I am seeing the same issue with Linux Mint 18. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546641 Title: unity-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in up_exported_daemon_get_lid_is_closed()

[Bug 1510970] Re: Intel driver crashes on Ubuntu 15.10

I have had no crashes since a couple of days (however, of little usage). SNA is still active: $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep SNA --color [11.933] (II) intel(0): SNA compiled: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20150808-0ubuntu4 (Robert Ancell ) [11.933]

[Bug 1466889] Re: [Lenovo ThinkPad X250] SD card is not recognized.

Kernel 3.19.0-27-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 14 21:43:37 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [ 1262.959100] mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address b368 [ 1262.960257] mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 SMI 30.0 GiB [ 1262.961323] mmcblk0: p1 p2 [ 1263.068815] mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data,

[Bug 1442884] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-3.19.0/fs/btrfs/inode.c:3142!

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413008 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413008 This bug has effected me with linux-image-extra-3.19.0-26-generic linux-image-3.19.0-26-generic. I was doing an rsync job when it completely blocked. Unable to kill rsync, not even with kill -9. Unable

[Bug 1413008] Re: Kernel BUG shortly after mounting btrfs filesystem

This bug has effected me with linux-image-extra-3.19.0-26-generic linux-image-3.19.0-26-generic. I was doing an rsync job when it completely blocked. Unable to kill rsync, not even with kill -9. Unable to reboot -fn. Only hard resetting the server worked. (However, I was able to operate on

[Bug 752583] Re: Name resolution does not work with IPv6 only name servers

On Ubuntu Vivid, mtr-tiny 0.85-3 crashes without any proper output when having IPv6 only nameservers. It crashes in such way, that i need to issue a reset to get the terminal back into a sane state. Kindly see my attachment. ** Attachment added: mtr-tiny_ipv6_nameservers.png

[Bug 1291277] Re: bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

I had the same issue on Debian Jessie until I upgraded from version 4.3-11 to 4.3-11+b1 on amd64. This solved the issue! Changelog: bash (4.3-11+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes. * Rebuild against glibc 2.19-13 -- amd64

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

This also effects trusty LTS. Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

AFAIRC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success To

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

just tested that on Ubuntu 14.04: Package: bacula-common Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9.1ubuntu3 Severity: important Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

just tested that on Ubuntu 14.04: Package: bacula-common Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9.1ubuntu3 Severity: important Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title:

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

This also effects trusty LTS. Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

AFAIRC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success To manage notifications

[Bug 1351353] Re: Kernel oops

I am also seeing errors like intel_display.c:3313 intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips ... over various kernel releases from Ubuntu 14.04 and now Ubuntu 14.10. My hardware is a Lenovo X1 Carbon with an external display connected to the display port. lspci -nn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel

[Bug 1273201] Re: bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at boot

I'm looking forward to that :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273201 Title: bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at boot To manage notifications about

[Bug 1261873] Re: [trusty] usershare access denied error (leads to non working nautilus samba sharing)

As mentioned in comment 12, there are some configuration options regarding [homes] commented out. If you put these back in, (i.e. comment [home], ... back in), it will work with the Ubuntu provided packages. At least, I can confirm this to be working with samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.3.

[Bug 1261873] Re: [trusty] usershare access denied error (leads to non working nautilus samba sharing)

As mentioned in comment 12, there are some configuration options regarding [homes] commented out. If you put these back in, (i.e. comment [home], ... back in), it will work with the Ubuntu provided packages. At least, I can confirm this to be working with samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.3.

[Bug 1273201] Re: bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at boot

I can confirm this for DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS and network-manager 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7. Reverting bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch (and recompiling) seems to solve this issue. Kindly re-evaluate

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

any news on this bug report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

any news on this bug report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249 Title: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Bug 1183804] Re: [Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U772] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1028 intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0xe2/0x1a0 [i915]()

seeing this issue on Ubuntu 14.04 amd64, currently running linux-image-3.15.0-2-generic from May 26th. I've also seen this running stock 3.13.x from trusty. Will try linux-image-3.15.0-5-generic_3.15.0-5.10_amd64.deb (current utopic kernel) next. Cheers, Raoul -- You received this bug

[Bug 1310279] [NEW] Enabling mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

Public bug reported: # a2enmod mpm_prefork Considering conflict mpm_event for mpm_prefork: Considering conflict mpm_worker for mpm_prefork: Considering conflict mpm_itk for mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

[Bug 1310279] [NEW] Enabling mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

Public bug reported: # a2enmod mpm_prefork Considering conflict mpm_event for mpm_prefork: Considering conflict mpm_worker for mpm_prefork: Considering conflict mpm_itk for mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

[Bug 1095534] Re: Remmina remote desktop client goes fullscreen on the wrong display

Duplicate of bug 85? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095534 Title: Remmina remote desktop client goes fullscreen on the wrong display To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 999985] Re: remmina goes full-screen on the wrong monitor

still present in trusty with the most recent updates installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85 Title: remmina goes full-screen on the wrong monitor To manage notifications

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1 works in my home environment. Cheers, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548 Title: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global] To

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1 works in my home environment. Cheers, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548 Title: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global] To manage

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

Hi Robie, samba 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu5 seems to fix the issue - at least in my test environment using smbclient -L I will also try to test this in the environment I use at home and report back if this issue is also fixed there. Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

Hi Robie, samba 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu5 seems to fix the issue - at least in my test environment using smbclient -L I will also try to test this in the environment I use at home and report back if this issue is also fixed there. Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Hi Robie, Yes, there is a valid users = %S line present in the smb.conf file. When I comment it out, smbclient -L works as expected. What i did: 1) Comment out valid users = %S, see the diff: root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# diff -u ~/smb.conf.old smb.conf --- /root/smb.conf.old 2014-04-01

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Hi Robie, Yes, there is a valid users = %S line present in the smb.conf file. When I comment it out, smbclient -L works as expected. What i did: 1) Comment out valid users = %S, see the diff: root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# diff -u ~/smb.conf.old smb.conf --- /root/smb.conf.old 2014-04-01

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

If anyone wants to quickly update to the packages from Debian until this issue is fixed, here some wget lines for retrieving them: wget http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb; wget

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

#!/bin/sh VER=4.1.6+dfsg-1 ARCH=amd64 for p in samba samba-common-bin samba-dsdb-modules samba-vfs-modules samba-libs libwbclient0 python-samba smbclient libsmbclient; do wget http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/${p}_${VER}_${ARCH}.deb; done wget

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

If anyone wants to quickly update to the packages from Debian until this issue is fixed, here some wget lines for retrieving them: wget http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb; wget

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

#!/bin/sh VER=4.1.6+dfsg-1 ARCH=amd64 for p in samba samba-common-bin samba-dsdb-modules samba-vfs-modules samba-libs libwbclient0 python-samba smbclient libsmbclient; do wget http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/${p}_${VER}_${ARCH}.deb; done wget

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

Debian Bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914 ** Also affects: bacula (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1299249] [NEW] bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

Public bug reported: Package: bacula-common Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9ubuntu1 Severity: important # /usr/sbin/bsmtp -h backup -f (Bacula) root -s Bacula: Backup OK of backup-fd Full root bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success This happens on an

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

Debian Bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914 ** Also affects: bacula (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1299249] [NEW] bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

Public bug reported: Package: bacula-common Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9ubuntu1 Severity: important # /usr/sbin/bsmtp -h backup -f (Bacula) root -s Bacula: Backup OK of backup-fd Full root bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success This happens on an

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Dear Robie, actually, it is quite easy to reproduce during an update from saucy to trusty and i suspect that this bug will even strike when you do a clean trusty install. Nevertheless, i reproduced this issue with a fresh saucy install: 1. install saucy using

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Dear Robie, actually, it is quite easy to reproduce during an update from saucy to trusty and i suspect that this bug will even strike when you do a clean trusty install. Nevertheless, i reproduced this issue with a fresh saucy install: 1. install saucy using

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Thank you for your fast reply. Updating Samba 3 to Samba 4 *is* possible, please see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba . There might be some configuration changes but all in all it is no big deal to manually merge them - at least not for a basic setup without any active directory

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Thank you for your fast reply. Updating Samba 3 to Samba 4 *is* possible, please see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba . There might be some configuration changes but all in all it is no big deal to manually merge them - at least not for a basic setup without any active directory

[Bug 1292548] [NEW] Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Public bug reported: I have been using Samba as a standalone server since many years and have successfully gone through multiple Samba upgrades. This week, I upgraded from Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) to Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty). This came with an upgrade from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to

[Bug 1277432] Re: Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

Debian now ships 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 which works for me - the version currently shipped with Ubuntu does not, see bug 1292548 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277432 Title:

[Bug 1277432] Re: Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

Debian now ships 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 which works for me - the version currently shipped with Ubuntu does not, see bug 1292548 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277432 Title: Please update

[Bug 1292548] [NEW] Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

Public bug reported: I have been using Samba as a standalone server since many years and have successfully gone through multiple Samba upgrades. This week, I upgraded from Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) to Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty). This came with an upgrade from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to

[Bug 1291277] [NEW] bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

Public bug reported: After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty, bash-static's prompt incorrectly reads 'I have no name!@server', whereas bash's (and also zsh's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'. Packages: $ dpkg -l|grep bash ii bash 4.3-2ubuntu1

[Bug 1291281] [NEW] compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh prompt: 'user@server'

Public bug reported: After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty, zsh-static's prompt incorrectly reads '@server', whereas zsh's (and also bash's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'. Also, when launching zsh-static from another shell, e.g. zsh, i see: user@server~ $ zsh-static compaudit:112:

[Bug 1291277] Re: bash-static: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash: 'user@server'

** Description changed: After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty, - bash-static 4.3-2ubuntu1 shows 'I have no name!@server', - whereas bash (and also zsh) correctly shows 'user@server'. + bash-static's prompt incorrectly reads 'I have no name!@server', + whereas bash's (and also zsh's) prompt

[Bug 1291277] Re: bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

== ApportVersion = 2.13.3-0ubuntu1 == Architecture = amd64 == Date = Wed Mar 12 11:36:21 2014 == Dependencies = apt-utils 0.9.15.4ubuntu2 debconf 1.5.51ubuntu2

[Bug 1291281] Re: compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh prompt: 'user@server'

== ApportVersion = 2.13.3-0ubuntu1 == Architecture = amd64 == Date = Wed Mar 12 11:47:08 2014 == Dependencies = dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5 gcc-4.9-base 4.9-20140303-0ubuntu3

[Bug 1264674] Re: nginx segfault when adding add_header in configuration

ack for nginx-extra gdb backtrace: root@www /etc/nginx # gdb nginx GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.1-ubuntu Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is

[Bug 1230917] Re: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

Is there any way to quickly address this problem by myself? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230917 Title: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

[Bug 1230917] Re: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

Is there any way to quickly address this problem by myself? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230917 Title: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart To manage