** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Phillip Susi (psusi)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
The bug is actually in parted, specifically in dmraid.patch. This
Ubuntu patch tries to identify dmraid partitions and remove them from
the list of disks that parted generates. It incorrectly identifies the
raid10 device as a partition and so removes it from the list.
I have started a discussion
No, what I need is a raid0+1 system to test with. Maybe I'll have to
set up a virtual machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748
Title:
Installer does not give correct choice of
Hello Philip,
lets discuss whether it makes sense -
I finally made the decision to roll - over my dual-boot (win7/ubuntu)
system and I installed raid 5 instead of raid 0 + 1. At this time I
could install ubuntu 10.04 without problems.
So, I am definite that since 8.04 all the way to 10.04 raid
Pakka, can you post the output of sudo blkid?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560748
Title:
Installer does not give correct choice of device to install to when
using dmraid 0+1
--
Ok, seems that this is dead end. Too rare configuration to generate
interest to be fixed. As result though Ubuntu 10.04.1 is completely un-
installable for nvidia 430 raid0+1 systems and also clear downgrade as
this configuration is working in 8.04. I feel frustrated and need to
start investigating
A bit continuing from #33: if we assume that dmraid is working
correctly, then the question is why initramfs is created during upgrade
wrongly i.e. dmraid does not activate automatically OR in case of live
cd - why dmraid doesn't get activated but manual command is needed to
activate raids?
Still,
I agree that lets take these problems down 1-by-1. However I remind that
there was the original problem that raids were not set active in 1st
place. So, before I could aproach installer I had to manually activate
"dmraid .ay". And that was also the probelm with 804 -> 1004 upgrade
i.e. boot sequenc
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: dmraid
+ When using dmraid 0+1, several devices appear in /dev/mapper to describe
+ the strips that form the legs of the mirror, and the mirror itself. The
+ installer only gives the choice of using the two stripes that form the
+ legs, and not the w
