[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-05-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for celt (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: celt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923226

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-02-18 Thread cheese1756
Some of the people on the Mumble server I visit only have 0.11.3 installed, and do not install 0.7.1. Due to this, I can't communicate with them. Would it be possible to create two versions of celt for the repositories, one that stays current and one that stays at 0.7.1 so that it remains

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-02-18 Thread Thorvald Natvig
These people you can't talk to have broken Mumble installs; the Mumble INSTALL document explicitly says that, if you tell it to use the system-installed CELT; this requires that you have CELT 0.7.0 or 0.7.1 installed on your system as CELT does not maintain bitstream compatibility Mumble

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-02-10 Thread James Page
Un-subscribing ubuntu-sponsors until way forward is agreed - please re- subscribed when agreement is reached and sponsorship is required. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923226 Title:

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-02-03 Thread Serge Hallyn
The bug description says Due to the package in the repository being so out of date, it doesn't work with certain applications such as Mumble. If that's false, can we update the description to remove it? If it's true, and if it's also true, as comment #5 says, that the newest is too new for

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-01-30 Thread Dave Walker
Thorvald, thanks for your input. Do you have thoughts on how we should proceed with this? It seems the Debian celt package hasn't moved in some time. Should we look to introduce a new versioned in name binary package for celt? Thanks ** Changed in: celt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-01-30 Thread Thorvald Natvig
Unless you have another package that depends on a newer version of CELT, is there a reason to package the new one? Debian has deliberately not packaged a newer version because there isn't a single package that depends on newer versions, whereas Mumble does depend on 0.7.1. Newer versions of

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-01-29 Thread Thorvald Natvig
Upgrading (and replacing) the old CELT will actually break Mumble, as CELT releases have non-compatible bitstreams, and the fallback- compatible bitstream in Mumble is CELT 0.7.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 923226] Re: Update celt to 0.11.3

2012-01-29 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
The attachment Debdiff to update to 0.11.3 of this bug report has been identified as being a patch in the form of a debdiff. The ubuntu- sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. In the event that this is in fact not a patch