On 12/08/15 07:56, Robert Ancell wrote:
> For us to use GNOME Software we probably want to update to the latest version
> [1]. That's currently blocked because it needs PackageKit 1.0
> [2]. And that's blocked until we get a Click update. If anyone knows more
> migration issues please add infor
For us to use GNOME Software we probably want to update to the latest
version [1]. That's currently blocked because it needs PackageKit 1.0 [2].
And that's blocked until we get a Click update. If anyone knows more
migration issues please add information to those bugs. I suspect we might
also need s
Le 11/08/2015 16:13, Jorge O. Castro a écrit :
> From a "Just Works for the Desktop", the drivers we ship in the
> archive work just fine. However, with all that's going in upstream
> OpenGL and (soon) Vulkan; coupled with AAA game releases; users are
> wanting to get the absolute latest drivers.
You're right: not all of them actually make sense in the new world order,
as we have a better solution on touch devices in particular. That's why we
started with just the one that signals the existence of webapps. The better
integration points and OA links are now directly with webapp-container.
S
> Thanks for the email. I read what you wrote but failed to understand the
> details of issue, could you give some details on what sort of issues you
> saw? Did we ship drivers buggy enough that you couldn't play with them?
> Was that fixes with the version you found in ppas?
For my use case, the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thanks for the email. I read what you wrote but failed to understand the
> details of issue, could you give some details on what sort of issues you
> saw? Did we ship drivers buggy enough that you couldn't play with them?
> Was that fixes
Le 30/07/2015 19:13, Amr Ibrahim a écrit :
> I suggest putting a roadmap for this to see if it's possible or not.
Hey Amr,
Having a roadmap and people interested in working on the transition
seems like a good first step!
Before suggesting a replacement the alternative should be proved to be
good
Le 11/08/2015 01:05, Jorge O. Castro a écrit :
> because our Nvidia driver story in Trusty isn't ideal
Hey Jorge,
Thanks for the email. I read what you wrote but failed to understand the
details of issue, could you give some details on what sort of issues you
saw? Did we ship drivers buggy enough
Le 11/08/2015 14:48, David Barth a écrit :
> Hmm, actually there is a problem, but thanks for the reminder.
Hey David,
Thanks for the reply, can you give some detail on that? Do we have
registered bugs for the issues?
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists
Hi David,
Are those extensions still needed for our Unity vision or does the new
Ubuntu browser make them obsolete? Already the Chromium part of those
extensions no longer works, could the Firefox part be dropped too?
What specifically is each one supposed to do?
Kind regards,
Bryan
On Tue, Au
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:41 PM, David Barth
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Chris Coulson
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/15 22:21, Xavier Guillot wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't answer to this specific question, but as an user with Firefox as
>> default browser on Ubuntu 15.04 Desktop, if th
Having a disjunct set of packages for every nvidia driver series has
served us well in my opinion. So this should be continued.
A slight change I would prefer is a det of common metapackages. Those
would control which driver gets chosen for install. Basically this could
match the linux-kernel packa
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> After some googling I found two people who are doing amazing work:
Bah, as pointed out in IRC I totally missed Rico and Robert:
https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
Sorry guys, it wasn't my intent to leave people out!
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Chris Coulson
wrote:
> On 10/08/15 22:21, Xavier Guillot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't answer to this specific question, but as an user with Firefox as
> default browser on Ubuntu 15.04 Desktop, if those addons are kept, perhaps
> they need to be signed.
>
> Today w
On 10/08/15 22:21, Xavier Guillot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't answer to this specific question, but as an user with Firefox
> as default browser on Ubuntu 15.04 Desktop, if those addons are kept,
> perhaps they need to be signed.
>
> Today when I updated to the latest FF Nightly 42.0a1 on the daily pp
15 matches
Mail list logo