Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: On mar, 2009-06-30 at 12:45 -0500, Evan R. Murphy wrote: XChat flashes the notification area, though it can be disabled. Should this be addressed as well, or is it a nonissue because XChat isn't a candidate for default install? Of course I am not the one who can

Re: Hover highlight effect inconsistency with GNOME applets.

2008-12-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Tomasz Dominikowski wrote: Any thoughts, suggestions, explanations? Sounds quite good. I like when we aim for more consistency :) Perhaps this should be proposed upstream to be included in the HIG though. Cheers, Emilio -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: Reorganisation of the desktop wiki pages

2008-09-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Sebastien Bacher wrote: The page looks great, I'm not decided about how we should claim updates though. Some packages are actively maintained by one person and some other can be claimed by the first one wanting to do the update. Did you use the wiki usual uploader informations? Does everybody

Re: Reorganisation of the desktop wiki pages

2008-09-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Cesare Tirabassi wrote: My problem is that many of these packages are not maintained by the Ubuntu Desktop Team, so I'm not sure that it is appropriate to list them all in this page; what I would really need is a list from the pov of the Ubuntu team. IMHO it's nice to have them. Although the

Re: Reorganisation of the desktop wiki pages

2008-09-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Pedro Fragoso wrote: Maybe we can use and change debian-gnome-status.py from Debian http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.22-status.html to gen the versions. This scripts uses dak and searches on the pkg-gnome svn the versions, perhaps we can change this to use rmadison and work from

Re: the size of Evolution

2008-04-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jeff wrote: Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 13:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : That's mostly the images for the documentation. It ships the images for a lot of locales, as some of them are localized. Hmm, at first I thought well there's nothing to do then... but why not split

Re: Chromium by default? :)

2008-02-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote: Hello everyone. There are a few games that comes with the default Ubuntu install, The games from gnome-games. mosly card games and snakes. I was thinking that too could use an upgrade. Chromium is a really cool and addictive game, that is easy to play and has

Re: Use a general ~Downloads-folder for all applications.

2008-02-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Ricardo Pérez López wrote: El mar, 05-02-2008 a las 16:30 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: Ricardo Pérez López wrote: El mar, 05-02-2008 a las 14:42 +0100, Jo-Erlend Schinstad escribió: It would be nice if we had one directory for downloads, whether you download using Firefox

Re: Use a general ~Downloads-folder for all applications.

2008-02-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote: There is also another thing to consider. While files are being downloaded, indexing services can begin to work overtime, since the files are changed continually. Indexing is a problem; on one hand, you'd like to have your downloaded files indexed and available

Re: Gnome-Bt should be removed from applications menu

2008-01-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Nanley Chery wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: What if someone sends me a mail and I'm using Mutt? I don't think the terminal will open gnome-bt. Is that a valid case for you? (although I won't expect any normal user to use Mutt ;) You are definitely right that a normal user wouldn't

Re: Gnome-Bt should be removed from applications menu

2008-01-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Friðrik Már Jónsson wrote: Hi Ubuntians, I can't see any problem it causes, or any harm in having it there. You say there are two many menu items in the Internet section. How many items are there in a default installation? 5 or 6? I don't think that's annoying. At least I can sleep well

Re: Gnome-Bt should be removed from applications menu

2008-01-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Nanley Chery wrote: I don't think this is justified. If you don't like it, you can edit the menus with alacarte and remove that entry. But the fact that you don't use it doesn't mean we should remove it (we could if there was a better reason, but I don't think that is one) Cheers, Emilio