Writing the packaging guide chapter on patching highlighted for me
that patches don't always work well with UDD.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team/ubuntu-packaging-guide/trunk/view/head:/patches-to-packages.rst
(line 90) What are people's favourite tactics for the .pc
Hi,
Sorry to repeat this, but is anyone at all able to help with the
below? We haven't been able to upload any new versions of ubuntu-docs
in oneiric until this is resolved.
Thanks in advance if you can help.
Matt
On 20 May 2011 08:23, Matthew East m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I realise that the
On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel Holbach wrote:
= Development Processes =
(2) developer application docs:
- too complicated,
- unclear expectations
Amounts of want-to-be-ubuntu-developer levels and their names are
misleading. I wanted to get rights to directly upload my packages and
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel Holbach wrote:
= Development Processes =
(2) developer application docs:
- too complicated,
- unclear expectations
Amounts of want-to-be-ubuntu-developer levels and their names
On 25.07.2011 13:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:
So I applied and (after ~6 weeks) during UDS-O DMB's meeting I got it.
Just to understand that what I really needed was 'Per Package Uploader'
level. So it edited my wiki page and applied again. Today I would
totally skip first phase as from my
On 20.07.2011 22:11, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am confused as to the definition of the different levels of Ubuntu
Developers and how that relates to membership in each of the various
teams (though probably involves overall project membership as well).
According to
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 16:25 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
On 20.07.2011 22:11, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am confused as to the definition of the different levels of Ubuntu
Developers and how that relates to membership in each of the various
teams (though probably
On 07/25/2011 10:35 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
I just updated that page a bit. It's probably not clear enough that
UCD is 'just' Ubuntu Membership granted by the DMB. Please help me
out by finding a way to clarify this.
It would be clear if we just called it Ubuntu Membership, rather than
having a
Hi there,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:01:39PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel Holbach wrote:
= Development Processes =
(2) developer application docs:
- too complicated,
- unclear expectations
Amounts of want-to-be-ubuntu-developer levels and
lintian 2.5.2~git20110720ubuntu1 in oneiric fails to build [1] and I
fail to find the reason. Help would be appreciated. It builds fine
locally, but it fails on the Ubuntu builder and with pbuilder, but it
builds on Debian unstable (both locally and with pbuilder). Two test
cases fail with wrong
Hello everybody,
Am 25.07.2011 13:51, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 07:45:50 AM Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel Holbach wrote:
= Development Processes =
(2) developer application docs:
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
Am 25.07.2011 13:51, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 07:45:50 AM Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel
On 25/07/11 10:42 AM, Iain Lane wrote:
Amounts of want-to-be-ubuntu-developer levels and their names are
misleading. I wanted to get rights to directly upload my packages and
when I discussed it with few developers I was told to apply for 'Ubuntu
Contributing Developer' (plus some text that
On Monday, July 25, 2011 11:11:43 AM Iain Lane wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
Am 25.07.2011 13:51, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 07:45:50 AM Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 13:01
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is Ubuntu
member that got their membership based on development contribution and not
some other kind. Do we really need a different name for this? It
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
jonat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I come across this on a weekly basis and I don't know where it's coming
from. I have people at work who fix things all the time and upload it to
PPAs and when I ask them why they don't become MOTU so that
On Monday, July 25, 2011 11:33:52 AM Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello,
Am 25.07.2011 17:26, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
The DMB is somewhat different than the other non-RMB membership boards
because the DMB grants membership based on type of contribution
(development) rather than area of
On Monday, July 25, 2011 11:34:47 AM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is
Ubuntu member that got their membership based on development
contribution and not
Hiya,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:59:08AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 11:34:47 AM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is
Ubuntu
On 25/07/11 11:38 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
jonat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I come across this on a weekly basis and I don't know where it's coming
from. I have people at work who fix things all the time and upload it to
PPAs and
I don't think you waste time installing Xubuntu by additionally
complementing it by installing ubuntustudio-graphics. For those who
don't use drawing software, downloading and installing Gimp is waste
of time and capacity anyway. For me default Xubuntu has never been all
I need and I have always
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 12:42:49 PM Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
...
I agree that it is confusing, but I don't think it has to be. The
ArchiveReorganisation[1] wiki page hasn't been edited in the last 2
On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
...
There was a discussion about it on IRC last week starting at
http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t20:43
In particular, this is the part about whether MOTU can or can't touch
packages in package sets...
On 07/25/2011 08:23 PM, Bruno Benitez wrote:
I do know that there is no such standard image editor but if we
never start finding one, or adding one to our apps then we will never
have one, I think there should be a standard image editor
(pinta/gpaint/nathive http://www.nathive.org//other) a
On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
...
There was a discussion about it on IRC last week starting at
http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t20:43
In particular, this is the part about whether MOTU can
I've recently added a couple of features to apport which modify the
information collected when a bug reporter reports a bug about any
package.
One is the addition of details regarding modified conffiles which are
a part of the package about which the bug is being reported. The bug
description
On Monday, July 25, 2011 03:48:38 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
...
There was a discussion about it on IRC last week starting at
On 07/25/2011 03:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 03:48:38 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
...
There was a discussion about it on IRC last week starting at
On Monday, July 25, 2011 04:52:42 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 03:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 03:48:38 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
...
There was
On Monday, July 25, 2011 05:44:21 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 04:25 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 04:52:42 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 03:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 03:48:38 PM Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/25/2011 02:05
I tried to do a sweep of the “Needs Fixing” branches in the hope of
quickly knocking out some of the noise. Of course, it always takes
longer than you think…
https://code.launchpad.net/~pro-mathesh812004/ubuntu/oneiric/scim-tables/oneiric/+merge/64119
• Set status to In Progress, noted what the
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:04 AM, eric fs...@att.net wrote:
I am hard to find any useful resource about how to use time() as
seed to generate random number in web. /* or maybe I not industry
enough */ plz help
$ man 2 time
srand( static_castunsigned int( time(0) ) );
--
Dmitry Andreychuk
32 matches
Mail list logo
