On 10/06/2011 03:31 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 08:13:21 PM Michael Bienia wrote:
UCD is in line with the other membership granting councils:
- Kubuntu council -> ~kubuntu-members
- Edubuntu council -> ~edubuntu-members
- Forum council -> ~ubuntu-forum-members
- I
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:34:32 AM Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do the other councils refer to themselves as "Kubuntu members" / "Forum
> members"? Or do they generally use the title "Ubuntu Members"?
I'm a member of the Kubuntu Council, so one of the things I do is evaluate
Kubuntu membership
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 08:13:21 PM Michael Bienia wrote:
> UCD is in line with the other membership granting councils:
> - Kubuntu council -> ~kubuntu-members
> - Edubuntu council -> ~edubuntu-members
> - Forum council -> ~ubuntu-forum-members
> - IRC council -> ~ubuntu-irc-members
> Only ~u
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 08:13:21PM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> UCD dates back to the time when MOTU Council was granted the right to
> grant Ubuntu membership. The idea for a subteam comes from Mark [1,2]
> when it was discussed how the membership granting gets implemented for
> the MC.
> UCD c
Greetings everyone.
I wanted to thank everyone who worked on the Kubuntu Docs for 11.10 (Oneiric
Ocelot). Thanks to your dedication and hard work we not only finished on time
but, we also got the translations worked on and finished too! Thank you all so
much!
So, with all of that said, I would
On 2011-10-06 12:04:11 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:25, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> >
> > Ubuntu Member: a recognized member of the Ubuntu community
> >
> > Ubuntu Developer: a Ubuntu Member who obtained their recognition through
> > contributing software development (patche
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:25, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
>
> Ubuntu Member: a recognized member of the Ubuntu community
>
> Ubuntu Developer: a Ubuntu Member who obtained their recognition through
> contributing software development (patches, sponsored packages, whatever)
>
I'm not sure there's a nee
On 5 October 2011 16:35, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This a problem I believe. I've thought about it and I think most any name we
> could come up with is problematic. There are a number of ways people get
> membership and we don't generally give them a special name. My proposal is
> rename Ubuntu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2011 02:34 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
>
> We should probably change one of "Ubuntu Contributing Developers" and
> "Ubuntu Developers" to reduce confusion - maybe "Ubuntu Developers"
> should be renamed to "Ubuntu Uploading Developers", and
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:03:26 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 10:47 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 09:30:22 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> >> To take an example I think porting universe GNOME2 applets to GNOME3
> >> wouldn't be a good use of our time,
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 08:34:59 AM David Henningsson wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 12:57 PM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Am 05.10.2011 12:40, schrieb Iain Lane:
> >> Please visit the page
> >>
> >>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Ubuntu_Contributing_Dev
> >>elopers>>
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 03:27:13 PM Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:00:55PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 13:28 +0100, Iain Lane a écrit :
> > > You might not ever hear about it, but every time something is
> > > removed you are potentially let
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:00:55PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 13:28 +0100, Iain Lane a écrit :
> > You might not ever hear about it, but every time something is
> > removed you are potentially letting people down.
>
> Right, but every time an annoying but in a sof
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 13:28 +0100, Iain Lane a écrit :
> You
> might not ever hear about it, but every time something is removed you
> are potentially letting people down.
Right, but every time an annoying but in a software that 90% of our
users run is not fixed because the time has been spe
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:34 AM, David Henningsson
wrote:
> I think one source of confusion is that "Ubuntu Contributing Developers" is
> not a subset of "Ubuntu Developers":
>
> According to the link above, "Ubuntu Developers /.../ are granted direct
> upload to the Ubuntu archive, according to th
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 16:08 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> >
> > During the oneiric development cycle we had syncs of library packages
> > from
> > experimental, introducing new sonames, and changing APIs in a w
Hello everybody,
these are the bits I got through today:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtkguitune/+bug/850791
- unsubscribed sponsors, upload not necessary for oneiric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/864095
- sync request was ACKed already, unsubscribing spons
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:21:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:17:43PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > […]
> > > > All three cases have in common that the packages were left alone for
> > > > month
While Oneiric is not yet released, it's time to prepare packages for the opening
of the P-series. Please add to the lists at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/P-SeriesOpening
what packages to prepare at the beginning of the release cycle, and what to
avoid. When adding to this list, please see it as a c
On 10/05/2011 10:47 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 09:30:22 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>> To take an example I think porting universe GNOME2 applets to GNOME3
>> wouldn't be a good use of our time, we better spend the resources we
>> have making sure our current desktop
20 matches
Mail list logo
