On Mo, Okt 31, 2011 at 10:44:09 (CET), Felix Geyer wrote:
> On 31.10.2011 07:39, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> We are talking about these source packages:
>>
>> - vcdimager
>> - libdvdnav
>> - libdvdread
>> - libfaad
>>
>> and possibly graphicsmagick for graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat.
>>
>> TBH
Jamie Strandboge [2011-11-14 12:24 -0600]:
> What about simply demoting the binary packages for this flavor, but
> still build it? We wouldn't have to explicitly test it for SRUs/security
> updates or deal with it with LTS backorts, but it would presumably still
> be in ok shape since we would be a
Hi Tim,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:43:28PM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Per discussion at UDS the kernel team is proposing to drop the
> non-PAE i386 flavour. The upgrade path for non-PAE users will be the
> PAE kernel. Those CPUs that do not have i686 and PAE support will be
> orphaned. To the bes
Am Samstag, den 12.11.2011, 18:43 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 04:04:35PM -0800, Evan Broder wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2011, 17:38 -0800 schrieb Evan Broder:
> > >> If there is more that lintian.uw.o co
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:07:43PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> sounds fine. Maybe coordinate that the powerpc builders are available for
> rebuilds if possible (no firefox, openjdk, etc. pending uploads, -proposed
> processing, etc).
Good idea. I'm checking with the security team and will make
On 11/13/2011 11:19 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:59:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>> I'm happy to shepherd this transition. While the transition to Perl
>> 5.12 involved some base system disruption, I do not think that we will
>> see the same problems with Perl 5.14, than
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:24:22PM -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:43 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > Per discussion at UDS the kernel team is proposing to drop the non-PAE
> > i386 flavour. The upgrade path for non-PAE users will be the PAE kernel.
> > Those CPUs tha
Hi John,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:44:15PM +0100, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> PAE was first added in Pentium Pro in 1995. So your servers have to
> be ~16 years old to not support it.
>
> So yes "a decade old" is still new enough, 2 decades old is not.
> Looking here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:43 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Per discussion at UDS the kernel team is proposing to drop the non-PAE
> i386 flavour. The upgrade path for non-PAE users will be the PAE kernel.
> Those CPUs that do not have i686 and PAE support will be orphaned. To
> the best of my knowl
Hello,
Am 14.11.2011 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> On 11/14/2011 11:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
>> I'll propose a compromise: how about we remove REVU from the
>> documentation for new packagers, so we're not pointing people there
>> first anymore. The MOTU/core-dev who are still using REVU f
On 11/14/2011 11:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
Am 14.11.2011 00:47, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
A web based tool to support publishing and reviewing packages seems
somewhat orthogonal to IRC channels to get help packaging. I think it's
premature to shut down REVU until DEBEXPO is a full replacement
On 11/14/2011 06:05 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello,
Am 14.11.2011 00:47, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On 11/12/2011 01:08 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
- The suggestion from the room was to close REVU now, and change the
documentation to point new packagers at #ubuntu-packaging and
#ubuntu-motu. It's
> Am 14.11.2011 00:47, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> A web based tool to support publishing and reviewing packages seems
>> somewhat orthogonal to IRC channels to get help packaging. I think it's
>> premature to shut down REVU until DEBEXPO is a full replacement (the
>> most critical thing for me
On Mo, Nov 14, 2011 at 13:46:21 (CET), Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Am 14.11.2011 12:28, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> On Mo, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:05:31 (CET), Daniel Holbach wrote:
>>> While it would be nice for debexpo to have a similar feature, it seems
>>> more worrying to me that we still ad
Hey,
Am 14.11.2011 12:28, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> On Mo, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:05:31 (CET), Daniel Holbach wrote:
>> While it would be nice for debexpo to have a similar feature, it seems
>> more worrying to me that we still advertise a process that is broken and
>> we set wrong expectations.
>
On Mo, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:05:31 (CET), Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 14.11.2011 00:47, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> On 11/12/2011 01:08 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>>> - The suggestion from the room was to close REVU now, and change the
>>> documentation to point new packagers at #ubuntu-pack
Hello,
Am 14.11.2011 00:47, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> On 11/12/2011 01:08 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>> - The suggestion from the room was to close REVU now, and change the
>> documentation to point new packagers at #ubuntu-packaging and
>> #ubuntu-motu. It's not helpful to new developers to have
17 matches
Mail list logo
