Hello, Am 14.11.2011 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman: > On 11/14/2011 11:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote: >> I'll propose a compromise: how about we remove REVU from the >> documentation for new packagers, so we're not pointing people there >> first anymore. The MOTU/core-dev who are still using REVU for package >> reviews can keep using it, they'll just tell their mentorees to go there. > > It's not a compromise at all. I think it's the correct solution. > > Existence of a tool doesn't create expectations, it the documentation > around it. Update that and problem solved.
I personally don't object to people still using it for their own purposes, even if PPAs (I know they suffer from the same-version problem mentioned earlier), VCSes and other tools do a similar job. If that's the general concensus, maybe we should also add a piece of text on REVU itself? The other pages I know that would need updating would be https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages Any others? Have a great day, Daniel -- Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/gplus.to -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
