server seed: remove acpid?

Hi, we are reviewing the server seeds (https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+ref/disco) and the acpid package came up. It's currently in the server seed, meaning it's installed by default. I did some tests in a VM, and a bare metal machine, running cosmic, and the

Re: Curl build

curl 7.58.0-2ubuntu3.3 in 18.04 does have gssapi support: $ curl -V | grep GSS-API Features: AsynchDNS IDN IPv6 Largefile GSS-API Kerberos SPNEGO NTLM NTLM_WB SSL libz TLS-SRP HTTP2 UnixSockets HTTPS-proxy PSL On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:19 PM Gilles Legoux wrote: > > Hello, > > How to build curl

Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Andreas Hasenack

Thanks all! On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 16:57 Olivier Tilloy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:54 PM Lukasz Zemczak > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Please congratulate Andreas on his today's successful Ubuntu Core > > Developer application! Great to have you on the team. > > Congrats

Re: Cosmic Cuttlefish test rebuilds

Thanks for this! I couldn't find the build log related to the libapache2-mod-perl2 build failure at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180911/+build/1535 Here is a bileto build of that package in cosmic-proposed and it worked for all arches:

Re: python3-numpy depending on *both* python 3.6 and 3.7

>> Better remove the versioned scripts altogether and use “python3.x -m >> numpy.f2py” when one really needs a non-default Python version. >> > > Yes, that's probably a better plan. I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/python-numpy/+bug/1789199 and linked it to the debian bug as

Re: Cosmic Cuttlefish (to be 18.10) feature freeze

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:52 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Dear Developers, > > As per the release schedule, Cosmic is now in Feature Freeze. > > Ideally you will all now be focusing on bug fixing and not on getting > new features into the release. > > As is the custom, packages that have been

python3-numpy depending on *both* python 3.6 and 3.7

Hi, while investigating some DEP8 failures currently in cosmic's migration, I came across this: $ dpkg -s python3-numpy|grep Depends Depends: python3 (<< 3.8), python3 (>= 3.6~), python3.6:any, python3.7:any, python3:any (>= 3.3.2-2~), libblas3 | libblas.so.3, libc6 (>= 2.27), liblapack3 |

Re: Proper way to handle britney hints

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:54 AM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Le 07/08/2018 à 00:00, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > It seems your MP has the review requested from a team that is not the owner > > of the target branch, do you know why that is? (~ubuntu-archive vs. > > ~ubuntu-release) > > Just as a

Re: Proper way to handle britney hints

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:01 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 09:39:27AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > I would like to know how to properly handle updates to the so called > > "britney hints", which controls how DEP8 test failure

Proper way to handle britney hints

Hi, I would like to know how to properly handle updates to the so called "britney hints", which controls how DEP8 test failures are handled in migrations. Particularly for the development release. I uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ocfs2-tools/1.8.5-5ubuntu1 on Jul 31st, and it has

Re: -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions in Ubuntu but not debian/ why?

Thanks all, very useful information. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Small addendum to Dimitri's comments: > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:45:12PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > does anybody recall why Ubuntu has -Wl,-Bsymbol

-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions in Ubuntu but not debian/ why?

Hi, does anybody recall why Ubuntu has -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions in dpkg-buildflags --get LDFLAGS but not Debian? It seems to be the case for about 10 years now, according to dpkg's changelog. I came across this change because of a delta we have been carrying in the autofs package for fix

Re: Road to new openssl

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Andreas Hasenack <andr...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Christian Ehrhardt < > christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Andreas Hasenack <andr...@canonical.

Re: Road to new openssl

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Andreas Hasenack <andr...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.

Re: Road to new openssl

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > > net-snmp > > > > Patch available in Debian BTS, was deferred for stretch: > > https://bugs.debian.org/828449 > > > > Fixed. > > It's stuck in excuses due to a hilarious chain of dep8 failures: net-snmp ->

Fwd: heads up: new bind9 from debian drops lwresd

Hi, the new bind9 packages from debian dropped the lightweight resolver (lwres) in version 1:9.11.2+dfsg-1: * Remove lwresd as it has been deprecated by upstream anyway Upstream dropped it in bind 9.12.x, but it still exists in the 9.11 code base:

Re: Road to new openssl

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:59:50PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > These are: > > bind9 > > Fixed in Debian unstable; Server Team will merge it this cycle. > > MP up:

Re: Road to new openssl

> > > > net-snmp > > Patch available in Debian BTS, was deferred for stretch: > https://bugs.debian.org/828449 > > 5.7.3+dfsg-1.8 has the patch now. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: 1000 New Year's pledges for 2018 (first Bionic Beaver test rebuilds)

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > The first test rebuild of Bionic Beaver was started on December 21 2017 > for all > architectures, all components (main component and seeded packages finished, > unseeded packages still building). The number of build time

Re: "testbed out of date"

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Iain Lane wrote: > It's a test which started to run when we got isolation-machine on s390x. > All of the tests were skipped before. I think this could be > force-badtested, and I've added that for you. > > Thanks > > Can someone confirm if the

systemd: service was disabled by user, what should package's postinst do?

Hi, I have a bug[1] on xenial where the user installed freeradius, freeradius-ldap and then disabled the service: systemctl stop freeradius.service systemctl disable freeradius.service When the freeradius packages are upgraded, freeradius-ldap's postinst fails to force-reload the service,

RFC: disabling the SMB1 protocol in our samba stack (client, server) (#1697817)

Hi, we had a bug [1] filed against Ubuntu as part of a larger campaign [2] to disable the old, vulnerable, deprecated SMB1 protocol in the Samba stack. I asked upstream [3] for their opinion on changing the default protocol level. In terms of an actual change, it's just a pair of independent

Re: 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) Beta 1 Released!

I'm a bit confused, sorry On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Kate Stewart k...@ubuntu.com wrote: Welcome to Saucy Salamander Beta 1 release, which will in time become the 13.10 release. Ok, Beta 1 This alpha features images for Edubuntu, Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME, UbuntuKylin, Ubuntu

Should gir1.2-gudev-1.0 depend on libgudev-1.0?

-1.0 dropped the dependency on libgudev-1.0 by mistake or on purpose. Thanks! - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFQvaMACgkQeEJZs

Could PPAs accept distro-proposed pockets?

or something? - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDLLrAACgkQeEJZs/PdwpAIZQCeOnldkn74UMtHmU23Kanr54Se myYAoI59xS3aIFNvTh1p4vSGQ5kySXOG =H171

Re: precise-updates and UDD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-09-2012 09:47, Andreas Hasenack wrote: This works, but fetches the released package (12.04.3), not the one from updates (12.05): Forgot to add the link showing that precise-updates has 12.05: http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates

Re: landscape-client in oneiric-updates

to do? - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/ggW8ACgkQeEJZs/PdwpDbcwCg2l9QkjZOxvdgIKLyLuCaV537 1ycAn0TJxWOO7QIWKDljlvDbp9wtrNQZ =Nd/V -END PGP

Re: landscape-client in oneiric-updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/19/2012 10:41 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote: On 06/18/2012 06:58 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/landscape-client.html#2012-04-22 00:43:56.697761 Should explain. What does that mean

Re: landscape-client in oneiric-updates

-source landscape-client oneiric-updates Thanks! I had no idea about pull-lp-source and was already starting to do some wgets. - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: landscape-client in oneiric-updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/19/2012 11:45 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/19/2012 10:57 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote: On 06/19/2012

Re: landscape-client in oneiric-updates

2.8.4 And I didn't have builddeb.conf. Thanks for the tip, that's now set. - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/g0g4ACgkQeEJZs

landscape-client in oneiric-updates

the released version as expected, not the update. Thanks! - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/foZYACgkQeEJZs/PdwpC4dgCg4dW599swGtANKW3gPaHVFpVu

Re: Screen calibration at UDS with the ColorHug

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/12/2012 01:00 AM, Robert Ancell wrote: [1] http://www.hughsie.com/ I wasn't excited for long: The current waiting time is now about 16 weeks. - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: What to do when a packaging branch is out of date

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/2012 11:31 AM, James Westby wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:00 -0400, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:56:27 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: So apparently a package update can be prepared using udd

Re: What to do when a packaging branch is out of date

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/04/2012 04:24 PM, James Westby wrote: Hi, It is now up to date again. Thanks! - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http

Re: bzr merge-upstream: why delete and add the same unchanged file?

upstream-branch foo-0.1.tar.gz bzr merge-upsteam foo-0.1.tar.gz fwiw, now I just go to branch, bzr export /tmp/some-tarball.tar.gz and then do bzr merge-upstream /tmp/some-tarball.tar.gz in the ubuntu branch. - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

What to do when a packaging branch is out of date

branches anymore? I emailed ubuntu-devel-discuss and someone told me that somebody has to manually commit to the udd branch, and that this is normal. - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla

bzr merge-upstream: why delete and add the same unchanged file?

? This file (and several others) didn't change between ubuntu:landscape-client and lp:landscape-client, it's exactly the same. - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: bzr merge-upstream: why delete and add the same unchanged file?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/2012 05:58 PM, James Westby wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:20:29 -0300, Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com wrote: Why is it removing and adding the same file? This file (and several others) didn't change between ubuntu:landscape-client

Fix released before Fix committed?

Branched 40 revisions. andreas@nsn7:~/bzr/landscape-client$ How come the package be in the archive already, but the branch is not committed? - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http

Packaging a twistd plugin and python-support issues

-support, but -central is more deprecated I think ;) c) anything else? Thanks! - -- Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5eK3wACgkQeEJZs/PdwpBDFgCg9wr

<    1   2