tzdata should be updated in legacy releases via Ubuntu Pro, which you
should be able to gain access to via ubuntu.com/pro
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, 17:19 Dauren Sarsenov, wrote:
> Hi, guys.
>
> Good news, I can see that an updated version of tzdata has been released
> for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
>
> Can
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 18:02, Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we just noticed again that we are still trusting 1024R keys for
> signing repositories in APT, arguably because we do not have a
> means to tell gpgv the minimum key size.
>
> While the upstream bug[0] is being worked on,
>
Hi,
This version of this driver has been available in the proposed pocket
since 2023-12-15 and is undergoing testing. It will be released to
updates once regression and certification testing is completed. Note
we do not release routine updates like these over the winter holidays
period which was
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:34, Adrien Nader wrote:
>
> (stripping the quotes a bit)
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > > The issue is that we do not know when will be the next openssl LTS. We
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:34, Adrien Nader wrote:
>
> (stripping the quotes a bit)
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > > The issue is that we do not know when will be the next openssl LTS. We
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:35, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> >
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:35, Adrien Nader wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A few weeks ago, openssl maintainers announced moving to a time-based
> > release (April and October):
> >
> > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/09/29/OpenSSL-Update-ICMC23/
>
This was causing us headaches like since forever. Our reproducers were very
intermittent to catch it. I think we might want to backport this everywhere
we can.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, 17:50 Krister Johansen, wrote:
> Hi,
> My team runs Ubuntu 20.04 on EC2. We use the cloud images that
> Canonical
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 20:41, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 11:51 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 09:21, Benjamin Drung
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > A few weeks
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 00:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 09:21, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > A few weeks ago, I posted an idea how to reduce the initramfs size and
>> > speed up the
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 02:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 01:17:27AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > If you want to test it yourself, you can find initramfs-tools
> > 0.142ubuntu7bd2 for mantic in my PPA:
> > https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
>
> What blocks
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 21:08, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > If it is a concern that v5.15 jammy kernel may potentially be used
> > after partial / incomplete upgrade to Mantic, we can opt into using XZ
>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 13:34, Adrien Nader wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > I was wondering if it make sense to construct a zstd dictionary for
> > compressing kernel modules but I didn't realize they need to be available
> > at decompression time, I'm not sure the
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 17:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 01:28:28AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > Okay. It works now. The not-compressed cpio archive must not be the last
> > > > one. So the order is now:
> > > >
> > > > * AMD/Intel microcode cpio archive (on amd64)
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023, 22:37 Benjamin Drung, wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 08:32 +0100, TJ wrote:
> > Is there a specific reason why the focus is on trying to shoe-horn
> > everything possible into the initrd.img and then compress rather than
> > winnow out the files an installed system will
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 11:42, Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 10:27, Julian Andres Klode
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I just go
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 10:27, Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I just got reminded that when we wrote the initial phasing code
> we made it not apply in chroots to avoid breaking builders and
> things.
>
> I'd like to remove that check because it's a bit unexpected. To
> do that, I'll
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023, 02:49 Benjamin Drung, wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 01:25 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 01:19, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > a year ago we changed the default compression
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 01:19, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> a year ago we changed the default compression and level for the
> initramfs to zstd -1. This fixed the very slow creation times on
> development boards (see bug #1958148), but that leads to bigger
> initramfs sizes that triggered
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023, 19:39 Matthew Wilson,
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> Do you have an update as to when the repository for Ubuntu 22.04.2 package
> Open-SSH will be upgraded from 8.9 to 9.3 to patch the security issues as
> it means our server is currently non-compliant.
>
Non complaint with
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 20:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Hi Seb,
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > I would like to ask if there is any chance the MIR team would reconsider
> > their position on the topic (at least until the day we have a somewhat
> > working
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 21:08, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Well, we found out that removing all NBS kernel packages for stable series
> was not altogether without its problems for users. We have modified the
> removal policy going forward in response to feedback.
>
> Meanwhile, in
We had similar dilemma around focal release. And I did SRU one off upgrade
from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1. it was a minor disaster. (As in like the sad
depressing songs in A minor scale).
It is best to stick to one openssl version in a release.
It is best to stick to longer supported one.
It is best not
a container\other
> machine.
> Now I see the same for linux-headers-5.15.0-1030-gke version.
> Thanks
> ________
> From: Dimitri John Ledkov
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 03:03
> To: Elad Gabay
> Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
>
>
Please see this discussion over here
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2023-May/139336.html and
the emails before/later in the thread.
tl;dr Note you have access to headers on the host that you can bind
mount in the container, you are using obsolete out-of-date kernel ABI.
You can use
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 16:19, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:20:39PM +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> > > I am therefore intending that, for jammy and later releases, we start to
> > > prune NBS kernel packages on an ongoing basis, not just at EOL time.
>
> > We already have
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 22:52, Vishwanath Pai wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed that with the latest update to grub2-unsigned, one of the build
> dependencies is gcc-10.
> But gcc-10 is not available on bionic. We build ubuntu packages in our build
> system from source but
> unfortunately we
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 17:54, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 13, 2023 10:29:50 AM PDT Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various
> > reasons they are not.
>
> This is understandable
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 17:54, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 13, 2023 10:29:50 AM PDT Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various
> > reasons they are not.
>
> This is understandable
Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various
reasons they are not.
This is not unique to lowlatency flavour, and applies to kvm, azure,
raspi, and many more kernel flavours all of which are still on v5.19
in Lunar.
We pushed 6.1 out, and migrated, on generic only, to migrate
Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various
reasons they are not.
This is not unique to lowlatency flavour, and applies to kvm, azure,
raspi, and many more kernel flavours all of which are still on v5.19
in Lunar.
We pushed 6.1 out, and migrated, on generic only, to migrate
Secureboot allows kexec, when using the recentish kexec_file_load syscall
which performs kernel image signature verification.
All of this just works under secureboot.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, 20:20 Aaron Rainbolt, wrote:
>
> On 2/24/23 11:51, Dan Bungert wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 17:05, wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I checked the wiki and docu but couldn't find that process described
> somewhere.
>
> Is there a ticket system where I can open a wishlist-bug or something
> else to ask for introducing a new package into the "main" repository?
>
> "universe",
In such cases it is usually best to bump version number, and do a fresh
upload to lunar-proposed such that it is higher than any of (kinetic,
lunar).
Might make sense to still upload no change rebuild of dbus into
lunar-proposed.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, 18:45 Sebastien Bacher, wrote:
> Hey there,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:29, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/9/22 18:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> >> We are in the process to upstream out changes. We got disrupted by other
> >> work for our main product but will continue to send new patches soon.
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:20, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
>
> On my system, if the initrd isn't readable by the kernel, it results
> in a kernel panic. Is that to be expected despite inird-less boot? Or
> is that an indicator that at least Lubuntu (and probably Ubuntu
> Desktop) does use an initrd?
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
> > all.
>
> What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
> initrd.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 16:24, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> On 8/9/22 15:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> &
Heya,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 15:30, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not directly involved with this in general, but if I understand
> the question and some processes correctly:
>
> The package versions in a given Ubuntu release are (usually) a result
> of a Time Based Release
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as
> statically into the kernel instead of using a module?
>
> Reason I'm asking is that we are currently working on a couple of fuse
> improvements and
>
> a) A
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 13:36, Daniel van Vugt
wrote:
>
> I find myself increasing the VT console font size on practically all modern
> machines:
>
>sudo dpkg-reconfigure console-setup
>
> Is it perhaps time that Kinetic defaulted to a larger console font?
>
Is this upgraded machine, or
In the past, when we did uploads into Ubuntu that we want to autosync,
we simply used `+bN` as those are bigger than last debian source
version, and get autosynced.
It is a slight misnomer, as it is Debian's binNMU version number, but
that also means none of debian's source versions may ever use
On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 20:22, Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:06 PM Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 02:34:30PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > > Alternatives that come to mind are:
> > > - kea, of course (from ISC). dhcp server
During kernel package builds compressing debs often takes a very long time
without any feedback.
I was considering to start patching dpkg-deb to fork and compress things
via pv to get progress output in the build logs.
I can't remember where, but it would be nice for pv to output info after a
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 18:50, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:58:27PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Please don't. There are many bugs in older compat level that may produce
> > debs no longer compatible with our OS. Especially around generated
>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 15:02, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
> Le 23/03/2022 à 15:58, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
> > It's best to upgrade packaging to compat level 13. Sounds like a long
> > overdue packaging upkeep.
>
> Yes it's better, but it requires work, do we ha
Please don't. There are many bugs in older compat level that may produce
debs no longer compatible with our OS. Especially around generated
maintainer scripts.
It's best to upgrade packaging to compat level 13. Sounds like a long
overdue packaging upkeep.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, 14:34 Sebastien
Longer term it would be easier if we do a merge from debian now to
preserve just the `export NO_PKG_MANGLE=1` delta (if that is still
required), otherwise a forcesync.
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 1:40 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:05:38PM +, Robie
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, 17:13 Julian Andres Klode,
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> some time ago, the default compressor for initramfs was changed
> from lz4 -9 to zstd -19. This caused significant problems:
>
> - it is very slow
> - it uses a lot of memory
>
> The former is a problem for everyone, the latter
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:52 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:56:18PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0300, Lucas Moura wrote:
> > > We want to ask for opinions of this change to other Ubuntu developers, to
> > > see if we are not missing
I have been playing whack-a-mole trying to fix usage of those two
commands in all the places. It will be a painful and long process, not
only because we need to merge changes from Debian, but because we have
Ubuntu-specific deltas that use those commands all over the place as
well.
I agree that
It says right in the installation log why it is incompatible with your system:
"""
The aufs storage-driver is no longer supported.
Please ensure that none of your containers are
using the aufs storage driver, remove the directory
/var/lib/docker/aufs and try again.
"""
The package prevents
Hi,
I sympathize with your experience. The firmware updates delivered via fwupd
come directly from the OEM of your hardware. In this case Dell. The
application of dell updates via fwupd, remote management consoles, or via
manually downloaded firmware updates images from their website are
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:48 PM Simon Chopin wrote:
>
> Hi Robie,
>
> Quoting Robie Basak (2021-10-11 12:39:00)
> > I think it's worth noting what happened with nodejs in Bionic:
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1779863
> >
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 7:02 PM John Cummings wrote:
>
> Hello, does anyone know what the plans are for gnutls in Ubuntu 20.04.03 LTS
> (focal fossa)? It is currently at 3.6.13, and I don't see an update in
> focal-backports. The recent expiration of a root certificate used in older
> Let's
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:12 PM Steve Langasek
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers
> wrote:
> > There's an nfs-utils SRU¹ hanging around waiting for a policy decision on
> > use of the After=network-online.target systemd unit
My preference would be to open up some refs of git-ubuntu repositories to
uploaders to be read
Such that one could created dgit like uploads and push the commit id, as a
ref, into the git-ubuntu repository directly. Aka
refs/heads/uploads/commit-hash as a branch.
Then upon import git-ubuntu
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:18 AM Heather Lemon
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could we also mention that when you're doing SRU verification, [Verification
> Done], that it needs to be a comment and not edited in the description.
>
Do you want it to be changed in the SRU policy ?
This mailing list is not appropriate for your questions.
This mailing list is for developing the next release of Ubuntu itself.
Not support or discussions around the stable series.
Please join discourse.ubuntu.com to discuss Ubuntu Server installation
options in the server topic -
live supports autoinstall with simple yaml files to describe the
install which are a lot more simple than either kickstart or preseed.
Have you looked into
https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/install/autoinstall and does that at
all fit your needs?
Alternatively if you have more than 3 servers to
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:59 PM Nish Aravamudan
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have been testing a network-isolated Ubuntu mirror inside our network and I
> am trying to understand if what I envision should work or not.
>
> In particular, I am trying to minimize how much review is needed for package
>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 2:31 AM Alex Murray wrote:
>
> setfacl -m u:libvirt-qemu:rx $HOME
>
Similar to above for qemu are there similar setfacl commands, would
something similar be also needed for:
- sshd user to access ~/.ssh/authorized_keys , or nothing needed there?
- in GNOME making ~/Public
Conditions* are unaffected at all, and are unrelated to the issue at
hand whatsoever.
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 08:33, Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 7:43 PM Brian Murray wrote:
> >
> > Recently there was a systemd change regarding PathExists for
> > systemd.path units that
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 11:35, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > chroot builders do call ~= `sudo chroot` at some point.
>
> The main work is done by sbuild, which uses schroot, not "sudo chroot".
>
Hi,
May I ask you why are you trying to rebuild systemd?
Note that CVE-2020-1712 is fixed in Ubuntu, in all series that it
affects, including 18.04 see
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2020/CVE-2020-1712.html
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 18:15, rafi Moor wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 23:25, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > Failing that, can somebody advise on whether there's an appropriate way
> > > to configure this in an image without having to maintain
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 17:49, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:57:28PM -0300, Guilherme Piccoli wrote:
> > Hi Colin et.al., first of all thanks for the builder update and
> > heads-up! We've noticed a failure in building cryptsetup from source,
> > reported in LP #1891473
Hey,
linux kernel upstream has changed how signatures look like in
v5.2-rc1, and only kmod 27 learned how to parse them. But bionic ships
kmod 24, meaning with hwe / cloud kernels, the information printed by
e.g. modinfo is incomplete.
Normally bug reports should be opened in launchpad, i have
Currently https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuSeededSnaps does not specify
anything about tracks.
Currently the status quo is to seed the default-track of the snap, aka "latest".
Recently we have been approached by LXD upstream to use a different
"LTS" track of the seeded lxd snap which has longer
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 13:32, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> In doing SRU reviews today, I came across LP: #1889106 which is a
> request for a no-change rebuild to bump the version so it beats the
> versions presented in previous releases.
>
> The problem is real, but it seems suboptimal to me to
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 10:54, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v2 times out on armhf, filed
> https://github.com/square/go-jose/issues/326.
>
> Then I looked at the icu transition.
>
> 0ad fails to build due to gcc-10, I found the fix for this
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 19:09, Nicholas Guriev wrote:
>
> Dear Ubuntu developers,
>
> GNU coreutils 8.32 have been released on March 6th, 2020, yet the
> package is not updated in groovy. The new version has enhanced support
> of file creation time in stat(1) and introduced the "--time=birth"
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 21:23, Andrei Rybak wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I like to use apt and aptitude for my Ubuntu installation. I was
> surprised to find out today, that the packages ubuntu-desktop and
> ubuntu-desktop-minimal do _not_ depend on the package ubuntu-minimal.
> Description of the
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 00:14, Boris Verkhovskiy wrote:
>
> When I install python-is-python3, python becomes python3 but I still
> have to type pip3. I think either python-is-python3 should make pip
> into pip3 (which might be surprising to some, since pip3 is installed
> separately) or I would
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 20:42 Mitch 74, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Considering that now lz4 is by default enabled in kernel, wouldn't it be
> better to use it as a compression algorithm in zram instead of lzo?
>
Can you benchmark the performance?
When changing initrd compression we have done extensive
finishing off boost1.71 transition
boost1.67 -> boost1.71 was started last cycle, but there were a few
packages still using boost1.67 in focal. Notably those that were still
using boost-python2. Uploaded: regina-normal uwsgi libpwiz ompl
freeorion mongo-cxx-driver-legacy frogatto innoextract. This
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 11:02, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've spend today working on +1 maintenance
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam,
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam/Status).
>
> We have a few transitions ongoing (gsl, hdf5, perl, ...) which are
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 20:25, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The relevant germinate output is
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.groovy/i386+build-depends
>
> This shows the source packages that are in the set, as well as why they're
> pulled in.
>
> rdma-core is
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 15:00, Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> I've been reviewing some of ack's changes for the maas deb2snap
> transitional package, and in the latest merge request
>
> -
> https://code.launchpad.net/~ack/ubuntu/+source/maas/+git/maas/+merge/383411
> -
>
> a topic came up that I
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 01:56, Suniel Mahesh wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a board based on Rockchip RK3399 64-bit SOC based on ARMv8A.
> The board can boot from the following devices: Micro SD, EMMC, USB, NVMe SSD.
> I have installed Ubuntu focal fossa with LXDE Display manager(built a
> headless
On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 07:34, Haug Bürger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tested the latest 20.04 release in the hope that the installer
> improved. It did not improve. The desktop installer really needs work.
>
> It prefers plain text vs encryption which is not appropriate these days
> and makes Ubuntu
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, 20:19 Colin Watson, wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:36:01PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > c-n-f service probably doesn't know about groovy yet. It is deployed
> > as a service on that autopkgtest juju environment. Not sure which
> > release,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 13:18, Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> I did some work to get python-apt in with groovy added to the
> distribution metadata, so we don't end up with a lot of regressions
> like last cycle.
>
> * Various packages needed retrying with new debootstrap, as they
> missed the
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 20:53, Jack Howarth
wrote:
>
> I am finding on a 2008 MacPro with GTX680 that the installation of the
> nvidia-340 package under Ubuntu 20.04 prevents single user mode boots from
> working. While the nvidia-340 driver works fine from a normal boot, when
> 'single'
I would like to request the following updates to the UbuntuSeededSnaps
Policy https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuSeededSnaps
7. Bases
Seeded snaps which use a base, must use "base: core18" or higher.
Existing snaps are grandfathered, but are encouraged to update to
"base: core18" or higher.
8.
All of Ubuntu is available for arm64 & armhf
Why bother with Debian, if all of Ubuntu is available anyway?!
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, 19:28 Onur GURSOY, wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> First of all you're great team. you done great jobs.
> I'm lovers of arm and you're supporting arm platform.
> I'm
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 03:23, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 12:26, Shane Carr wrote:
> >
> > Dear Ubuntu developers,
> >
> > I'm a member of the ICU TC (International Components for Unicode).
> > Developers frequently get ICU
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 16:28, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
> Sorry to interject, and with all due respect, but at this point it's pretty
> late in the game to expect anything to get done in Debian in time for feature
> freeze/Debian import freeze in just under two weeks.
Apart from that I am both
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 11:31, James Cameron wrote:
>
> G'day,
>
> Thanks for offering to be a "point of contact for upstream developers
> to reach Ubuntu developers."
>
> I'm an upstream developer for the Sugar desktop.
>
> Sugar isn't in Focal at the moment, due to Python 3 transition and
>
In debian, they have a thing called auto-transition tracker which
attempts to identify a change of library ABIs and automatically create
a ben transition tracker.
I have started to manually run that, and commit the trackers to our instance.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 12:26, Shane Carr wrote:
>
> Dear Ubuntu developers,
>
> I'm a member of the ICU TC (International Components for Unicode).
> Developers frequently get ICU from the apt-get package "libicu-dev".
>
> We have a special ICU release coming out in March/April, ICU 66. This
>
So cyrus-imapd. blocking lots of packages on arm64 and armhf.
Looks odd, and sometimes passes, sometimes fails with a cryptic
message that needs a library that has not been compiled
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
'/srv/dovecot.git/src/lib-lda/libdovecot-lda.la', needed by
'imaptest'.
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 11:13, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 21:25, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 19:59, Steve Langasek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Dimitri,
> > >
> > > One point here:
&
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 21:25, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 19:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dimitri,
> >
> > One point here:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > - l
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 14:36, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> We usually tend to open the archive with a few prepared changes in place, for
> the 20.04 cycle we are planning to open with
>
> - python3.8 as a supported version, maybe already as the default.
>
> - link time optimization enabled by
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 17:41, Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> in recent weeks since [1][2] there were quite some bugs related to
> rebuilds or feature requests.
> Those kind of issues seemed to be partially expected quoting the bugs SRU
> text:
>
> "OpenSSL 1.1.1 is ABI/API compatible with
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 17:20, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> The second test rebuild of Eoan Ermine was started on September 06 2019 for
> all architectures, all components. The rebuild of the main component is
> finished, the other components (restricted, universe, multiverse) are still
> building.
>
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 21:37, Mike wrote:
>
> Today, to properly install rpm-packages on my laptops, I'm running
Which rpm packages are they? For which architectures? Is .deb
available? Or snap? If not, have you tried reaching out to the vendor
to provide snap/deb? Do you want us to reach
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 19:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> One point here:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > - lz4 size weight over gzip is marginal (14%) but imho worth the
> > improved boot time & initr
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 09:13, Seth Arnold wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:46:57AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > As if lz4 kernel & xz initrd would yield the fastest boot time? That
>
> I'm lacking some context here, but I think building the initrds is alre
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
