Hello,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:21:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:17:43PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > […]
> > > > All three cases have in common that th
be run through them first, in a
similar-but-not-as-complicated role to that played by the Debian release
team.
As we rely quite heavily on Debian for QA anyway, we can probably only
care for those transitions happening in Ubuntu first (as you said).
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
Hey,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:57:36PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 05.10.2011 12:40, schrieb Iain Lane:
> > Please visit the page
> >
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Ubuntu_Contributing_Developers
> >
> > to see our cur
requirement to go through any other.
Remember, the page linked above is on a wiki so please be bold and make
improvememnts when you can see opportunity to do so. Concrete
suggestions for improvements are preferred. :-)
Regards,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk
urce builds the
> new libgwibber2 binary. As far as I'm aware libgwibber1 has a single
> rdepend: the obsolete indicator-me. This looks like a candidate for
> removal rather than sync?
Yeah, that's right. See #811185. Closing the other one now, thanks!
Cheers,
--
Iain L
mean to badger with
> >>> questions on the list, it's only because I can't find any information
> >>> on how else to interact with the board.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> -- Chase
> >>
> >> Hi,
&g
eved and should only be something the DMB can choose to fallback
> to on a case by case basis and not offered as a general way of applying.
+1. I'm sorry everyone finds it so terrible currently.
Regards,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@oranges
umask, I suggest
> running the tests with an "umask 022" statement.
I believe this is fixed by
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=f5b9b28a55b6a786fd6192b9fde06bef19206e30
but I haven't tested it. If someone has time, they could
uidelines, at least as much as can be written
down
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess
Please help to improve.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@d
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:54:00PM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 16:11:43 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > > I agree that the name is misleading and it's unfortunate that it
> > > conf
recognition of
past good work. If people don't think membership is a thing worth
getting then that is another issue.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
part of) and I think
> that's correct. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard does not
> discuss how the DMB is formed (perhaps it should).
I share your interpretation too. Backed up by this page
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/Restaffing
Cheers,
--
Iain L
omething sensible. Even
> if we just change it in the documentation.
I just added a discussion item to the next DMB agenda to rename the team
to Ubuntu Development Members. This is in line with the other delegated
(non RMB) membership names, and I think is much less confusing.
Cheers,
--
Iain La
got it.
> Just to understand that what I really needed was 'Per Package Uploader'
> level. So it edited my wiki page and applied again. Today I would
> totally skip first phase as from my perspective it was useless waste of
> time.
That is unfortunate. Could you help to
ev):
Per-package uploaders [...] are implicitly considered Ubuntu Members
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#PerPackage
I just updated that page a bit. It's probably not clear enough that UCD
is 'just' Ubuntu Membership granted by the DMB. Please help me out by
fin
for, it is rare for applications to be
accepted from people contributing for less than 6 months.
The DMB also applies these tests when granting membership. Please be
mindful of these when you (even implicitly and without naming specific
occasions, which invariably is what happens) criticise our a
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:32:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, July 21, 2011 03:05:04 PM Iain Lane wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:40:44AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > > On 07/21/2011 11:17 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> &g
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:40:44AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 11:17 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 21, 2011 01:09:46 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> >> On 07/20/2011 04:02 PM, Iain Lane wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:16:45PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 05:43:23 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > [...] And then I guess you could add "should
> > Canonical-sponsored upstream projects be treated differently than
> > other upstream projects for purposes of Ubunt
Hello there,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:00:31PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the desktop team meeting today we discussed deprecated libs and
> CD space, tomboy is keeping libgnome, libgnomeui, libbonobo,
> libbonoboui, libgnomecanvas on the CD in oneiric and will until upstream
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:54:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
[...]
Hrm. So syncpackage generates a .changes for uploading to ubuntu from
the .dsc (which presumably came out of the Debian build). That does
mean though that the Ubuntu target suite is not visible in the
changelog of the ultimate U
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:20:08PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Didier Raboud writes ("Re: Color Management in Debian"):
Given that Debian is currently not frozen (and that the Oneiric
release will very probably happen before Wheezy's), I really think
that not uploading those packages to Debian fir
Hi there,
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:08:49AM -0400, Etienne Goyer wrote:
Hi guys,
Even though I am not involved in the SRU process, I systematically skim
the patch pilot report in case an upcoming SRU would be of interest to
me. The important bit for me is to know which package is about to get
=== Developer Membership Board meeting, 2011-04-25 ===
Chair: Iain Lane
Present: Cody Somerville, Benjamin Drung, Mackenzie Morgan, Stéphane
Graber, Michael Bienia
Review of previous action items
* Laney to update delegated teams to allow members to renew their
memberships
Hi all,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:20:01AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
Developer Membership Board meeting 2011-03-28 19:00 UTC
[...]
* New meeting time (IainLane)
Following discussion on the DMB list about problems achieving
quorum, it was agreed to move our 1900UTC meeting to 2000UTC so
Developer Membership Board meeting 2011-03-28 19:00 UTC
Chair: Cody Somerville
Present: Michael Bienia, Benjamin Drung, Iain Lane, Mackenzie Morgan
== Review of previous action items ==
* Emmet Hikory to organise the selection process for DMB renewal
Done
== Administrative matters
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:01:10AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
For that matter, if DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog were the default,
there would be an explicit "mark this ready for upload" step that typically
consists of 'dch -r &
Hello everybody,
We are ready to start the new Ubuntu Packaging Guide project. After long
discussions we finally figured out a workflow for how we'll run the project.
* The code lives in lp:ubuntu-packaging-guide.
* Bugs (problems, typos, requests for new guides, etc.) can be filed
at htt
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
