On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:50:07AM +, Dave Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:15:43PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > I was just reviewing the SRU's that Chuck Short uploaded for keystone,
> > nova, and glance to oneiric-proposed, and it strikes me that really
> > OpenStack core component
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:15:55PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
> I don't think I've ever needed to know which particular binary package
> of a source is at fault.
This was exactly the logic for Launchpad Bugs being source package oriented,
rather than binary package oriented like debbugs. The bina
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:50:30PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> At UDS-O, we discussed CD space again (as at many a past UDS). Colin has
> nicely summarized the discussion:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/OneiricCDSizing
>
> Following on the tail of this, a few of us have been
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:52:17PM -0400, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When user file bugs on the distribution and enter a package name in the
> widget, Launchpad automatically adds a line to the description with
> Binary package hint: binarypackagename
I would welcome its disappearanc
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:17:09PM -0700, Evan Broder wrote:
> Hmm...a lot of this discussion seems to be getting caught up in the
> ubuntu-devel moderation queue, but I'll try to guess context as best
> as I can...
The moderation queue doesn't have any outstanding messages for this thread,
though
(also posted at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard/TeamReports/11/June)
Chair: Matt Zimmerman
Present: Scott James Remnant, Kees Cook
Apologies: Colin Watson, Mark Shuttleworth
A complete meeting transcript with relevant links is available at:
http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ubuntu-meeting
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:16:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:11:51AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Matt Zimmerman (m...@ubuntu.com):
> > > Maybe I'm weird, but I use dmesg for a lot of "normal" tasks, not just
> > > deb
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:54:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Iain Lane writes ("Re: Uploading to multiple distros"):
> > For "normal" syncs we generally advise not using syncpackage, but it
> > might make sense when doing simultaneous uploads.
>
> Hrm. So syncpackage generates a .changes for u
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:17:59AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:29:33PM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:55:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I won't say it doesn't complicate things, but I would like to point ou
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:55:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I won't say it doesn't complicate things, but I would like to point out
> that everyone else's suggestion for this is to completely remove the values
> from the dmesg report itself, rendering it unavailable to any user, even
> root.
It s
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:46:48AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> As we have continued to close kernel address leaks, the kernel syslog
> (dmesg) remains one of the last large places where information is being
> reported. As such, I want to close this off from regular users so that
> local kernel exploi
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:08:13AM +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> In 11.04 and later versions, the desktop CD installer (ubiquity)
> presents an option to upgrade Ubuntu if it finds a single copy on the
> system. This functionality is not exactly equal in operation to
> upgrade-manager, nor does it
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:06:14AM +0100, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> Here are some thoughts and questions about how to package a Java EE
> application so that it can be accepted in partner.
>
> We have packages that have been created a few months ago, and would be really
> pleased if they could
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:04:17PM -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> At long last, RFC-6013 was published today!
>
> Currently, any userland programs written to RFC-6013 will not
> interoperate with Linux 2.6.33 and beyond. I've made some patches
> for 2.6.37 -- they'll also need to be ported
(I know I'm very late to this discussion, but want to make sure this is
clarified)
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:27:29PM -0600, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> Let me break that down for easy viewing:
> * Application Developers
> * Application Selection and Defaults
> * Cloud
> * Development Process
>
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 05:56:27PM +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 05:31:26 pm Rick Spencer wrote:
> > > We want to empower, engage and harness application developers to develop
> > > on and for Ubuntu. These sessions cover the many elements in achieving
> > > that goa
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:14:46PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 05:56:27PM +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> > I believe that in order to do this properly, we need to massively
> > simplify our packaging model. Anything that makes a package
> > non-atomic (hello maintainer scrip
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:15:48PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:27:57AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > "support" does not imply "include on the CD image". The point would be to
> > make sure that it is available and usable by
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:10:20PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04.10.2010 02:30, Robert Collins wrote:
> > It would be really nice, as a 'runs unpackaged stuff on the distro'
> > use case, to support the highest python version on one LTS as a
> > non-default on the next LTS, consistently.
>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:35:40PM -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:47:04 +0200
> Allison Randal wrote:
>
> > The Package Selection and Defaults track is about choosing the
> > best-of-breed packages (applications, libraries, etc), a common task
> > across all editions of Ubunt
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:59:38PM +0100, Shane Fagan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:39 +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
> > The Project track is about building the community and improving our
> > development practices. Make the work of existing contributors easier by
> > removing blockers and strea
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:53:24PM +0100, Shane Fagan wrote:
> Can I as one quick question. Why are we changing the tracks around this
> time around? Is it something to do with more focus to the discussion?
The thinking is explained in detail in
http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/05/27/rethinking-the-ub
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:31:12AM -0400, Scott Moser wrote:
> Hi all,
>I've got a need to generate a list of changes from manifest 'A' to
> manifest 'B'. I know the release for the manifest, and that it contains
> only packages in main, -updates, -security, and universe. The manifests
> loo
23 matches
Mail list logo
