ggered the test but I'm concerned this
excercise might be a waste of resources. Does anyone share this concern
and/or has any thoughts on how to avoid this?
Best,
-rt
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:31 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Cool, thanks.
>
> IT seems we have an addi
ense.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 22:11, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I couple of golang packages I care deeply about are stuck in
> hirsute-proposed due to autopkgtest failures that I had a hard time
> understanding. I've com
Hi folks,
I couple of golang packages I care deeply about are stuck in
hirsute-proposed due to autopkgtest failures that I had a hard time
understanding. I've come to the conclusion that the problem must be related
to
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/hirsute/update_e
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:55 PM Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote:
> continuity no longer builds the continuity binary package so I filed a bug
> to get that removed.
>
The continuity package in debian continues to build the binary package
'golang-github-cont
As annoying as it is, but unless anyone objects or has a better idea, I'm
going to disable that particular test for the time being in ubuntu.
That would be a very unfortunate delta to the debian package :-(
-rt
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:43 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lo
Hi,
Long time no see :-)
I've been working on getting buildah, skopeo, podman into Debian, and
finally those tools are available. Now I wanted to dust of my Ubuntu
packaging skills and bring them over to ubuntu, and am encountering issues.
I figure most of them are due to changes I wasn't able to
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Adam Conrad wrote:
>> As of nowish, Feature Freeze is in effect for utopic (14.10), leading
>> up to the release in October.
>>
>> Don't fret if you have One Last Fe
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:16:50AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> This time, Libav11 is source-code compatible to Libav10. While the
>> SONAMEs did change, packages just need to be recompiled and do not
>> requir
I'll make sure to have a libav 11 release in a couple of weeks, that is,
way before utopic release.
The package in experimental is imo good to go, I'm only waiting for
permission to upload it to unstable, and expect that to happen soon.
I'll then upload the package to utopic later tonight, it nee
Hi,
I'm wondering what people think about having Libav11 in Ubuntu. In
debian, this transition as coordinated in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757917
This time, Libav11 is source-code compatible to Libav10. While the
SONAMEs did change, packages just need to be recompiled and
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> This is finally landing now. Thanks to everyone who helped out.
Thank you so much for pushing this!
BTW, Upstream promises very hard that the next upstream release
libav11 will not break any API:
http://blogs.gentoo.org/lu_zero/2014/03/24/l
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> [Fixed the subject.]
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 08:31:26AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I wonder what's the current status on the Libav10 transition:
>>
>> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 08:31:26AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I wonder what's the current status on the Libav10 transition:
>>
>> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/libav10.html
>&g
Hi,
I wonder what's the current status on the Libav10 transition:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/libav10.html
It appears to be stuck for some reason. Can we please push it through
and manage the fallout afterwards?
Thanks for considering.
--
regards,
Reinhard
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 4 November 2012 15:30, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Dear Ubuntu developers,
>>
>> I intend to upload libav 9 to raring rather sooner than later. I'm writing
>> you because:
>>
&
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>> wrote:
>>> Please upload into PPA, upload rdepends and wait for them to rebuild.
>>>
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> wrote:
>> Please upload into PPA, upload rdepends and wait for them to rebuild.
>> Find problems together with other interested people.
>
> Look, ma: https://
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 18:57, Anca Emanuel wrote:
>> I think you will need to CC this on all upstream maintainers.
>>
>
> No, don't spam people. Transitions is a distribution problem, not
> Debian's not Upstreams.
> Please note, transitions i
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> Please upload into PPA, upload rdepends and wait for them to rebuild.
> Find problems together with other interested people.
Look, ma: https://launchpad.net/~motumedia/+archive/libav9-raring/+packages
TODO list of affected packages is her
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 12:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> CC'ing ubuntu-motu as it heavily affects universe packages.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at
CC'ing ubuntu-motu as it heavily affects universe packages.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 04:30:52PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I intend to upload libav 9 to raring rather sooner than later. I'm writing
>> you beca
Dear Ubuntu developers,
I intend to upload libav 9 to raring rather sooner than later. I'm writing
you because:
- the package is not in debian/unstable yet, but currently sitting in NEW,
targeted at experimental (but syncing is not possible anyway)
- I don't think that there will be a similar f
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Serge Hallyn
wrote:
> Cool - what I use right now is pretty much
>
> https://s3hh.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/simple-netboot-setup/
>
> It's not as short and sweet as what I hope you'll end up with :) but once
> it's setup (as it is for me on 2 or 3 laptops) I just g
pkgtest
-> http://alioth.debian.org/projects/autopkgtest
It even got some traction again, this time in Debian:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/07/msg00821.html
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/
Cheers,
Reinhard
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
ubuntu-devel mailing
On Mo, Okt 31, 2011 at 10:44:09 (CET), Felix Geyer wrote:
> On 31.10.2011 07:39, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> We are talking about these source packages:
>>
>> - vcdimager
>> - libdvdnav
>> - libdvdread
>> - libfaad
>>
>> and possibly gra
On Mo, Nov 14, 2011 at 13:46:21 (CET), Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Am 14.11.2011 12:28, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> On Mo, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:05:31 (CET), Daniel Holbach wrote:
>>> While it would be nice for debexpo to have a similar feature, it seems
>>>
that are advertised to
potential contributors?
> Personally I'd rather like to see REVU closed, the documentation changed
> and for packaging review (or general code review) any VCS be used, where
> you can very easily track changes in packaging, without incrementing
> packaging versi
gt;
> Fix FTBFS with --as-needed linker option.
>
> patch at
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/84254985/velvet_1.1.06~nozlibcopy-1_1.1.06~nozlibcopy-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
>
> Thanks, Matthias
What's the correct severity in debian for such issues?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tar
On So, Okt 30, 2011 at 23:28:20 (CET), Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 10/30/2011 05:49 PM, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> On 10/30/2011 05:35 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> xine-lib (1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
>>>
>>> * merge from debian, remaining chan
.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:22:17 (CEST), James Vega wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> In source format 3.0, the option 'unapply-patches' (usually set in
>> debian/source/local-options) is used to indicate that patches are to be
>
en session. They of course don't have the knowledge nor
priviledges to write and install scripts and the system administrators
don't know which of the students exactly will use their screen sessions.
Sorry, there must be some better way to deal with long-running
background processes.
--
Grue
t into the changeset of the
bug
Moreover, such packaging fixes really should be forwarded to Debian.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
32 matches
Mail list logo
