PLEASE remove it, and ubuntu-sso-client!!!
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 15:15 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just noticed that we still have software-center in yakkety. It
> hasn't been maintained for several cycles, we never found anyone who
> wanted to port it to Python 3, the desktop
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:39 -0600, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >For ubuntu-sso-client, I would suggest not porting it, and if any code
> >needs to use an SSO client, the best options would be:
>
> If I'm not mistaken, Robert Ancell took a action item to see if straight-up
> OAuth could be used so
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:38 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Heya,
>
> On 5 November 2015 at 15:48, Rodney Dawes <rodney.da...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > One thing I notice, is that this list only includes runtime
> > dependencies, and not build time dependencies. To
One thing I notice, is that this list only includes runtime
dependencies, and not build time dependencies. To port things to Python
3, it's not necessarily just a matter of porting the runtime deps, but
also build deps will need porting.
For ubuntu-sso-client, I would suggest not porting it, and
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 09:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
unity-scopes-shell
This seems to have built fine in the test PPA, but probably needs a
no-change rebuild as it's the same version that's already in the
archive.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 14:25 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 11:18 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit :
[...]
There is no sponsorship of bugs in Launchpad.
I think it's vitally important here to make sure things are clear: yes,
there is such as thing as sponsorship
Please stop starting new threads with the same topic.
Discussion of a design to resolve this issue, needs to happen with the
Design team, as well as engineers who would be implementing the feature.
There is no sponsorship of bugs in Launchpad. If there is already a
bug about the window controls,
All such data is stored underneath the home directory (~/phablet). Most
of the data is stored in XDG directories, for which the environment
variables are modified for each confined application, so that data is
not accessible by other applications.
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 00:12 +0200,
Everyone, if you encounter any bugs or issues you have with the phone,
please file bug reports in Launchpad, or contact bq's support (if you
are using a the bq Ubuntu phone) to raise the issues. This mailing list
is not an issue tracking system, and all the developers of the software
in question
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 17:16 -0700, Dale Amon wrote:
Just out of curiousity, does any one know when it will
be available in the US?
The bq phone will likely never be officially available in the US. They
are a smaller manufacturer that only operates in the EU, and the current
phone does not
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 18:11 +, Iain Lane wrote:
Similar to you, I'm unsure about the benefit for stable releases. There
are probably cases where users struggling with bugs, or just trying to
verify them, appreciate being able to get proposed updates easily. Both
enabling NotAutomatic and
Does GCC 5 do something to cause dpkg-gensymbols to break? For example,
I was checking the list to see if anything I deal with directly was
broken, and checked a few of the other failures for packages I depend
on, to see what to expect. In doing so, I ran across the
ubuntu-download-manager [1]
Does GCC 5 do something to cause dpkg-gensymbols to break? For example,
I was checking the list to see if anything I deal with directly was
broken, and checked a few of the other failures for packages I depend
on, to see what to expect. In doing so, I ran across the
ubuntu-download-manager [1]
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 21:12 +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
Colin Law schreef op di 03-03-2015 om 09:05 [+]:
On 2 March 2015 at 15:40, Johan Kriel j...@hotmail.co.za wrote:
I would like to suggest the availability of shortcuts to files and folders
(like those used in Windows) also in
I've been trying to create one recently, under 14.04 running the
lts-utopic kernel. It seems the old problem of flushing is back. When I
run dd if=ubuntu-14.04.1-amd64.iso of=/dev/sdg bs=4096 it exits almost
immediately, and then the LED on the USB spends the next several minutes
flashing
with the specific laptop rather than your usb
creation method. Some UEFI are locked to Windows only or Windows and
RHEL only. Such as with http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
On 22 January 2015 at 14:23, Rodney Dawes rodney.da...@canonical.com
wrote:
I've been trying to create one
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 18:02 +0100, GatoLoko wrote:
Since different distributions and unix systems may have different paths,
you may want to use the env utility in a shebang like #!/usr/bin/env
python2.
Using /usr/bin/env will cause problems in certain conditions, such as
when running under a
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 00:44 +, Subhamoy Roy wrote:
I want to be Ubuntu operating system developer community member.My
email-id is subhamoy...@outlook.com and my contact number
+919051058163. I am willing to be a part of Ubuntu and ready to
contribute.
I've noticed that packages which have been changed already to explicitly
require gcc-4.9/g++-4.9 to build, are no longer cross-compilable under
sbuild as the gcc-cross versions don't seem to be getting set up
correctly in the chroot. Will having 4.9 be the default make it possible
to cross-compile
Building under sbuild should give you the same errors.
You probably shouldn't run gnome-keyring-daemon as part of the test
suite, but instead use the mock module's API to mock out any
interaction with the daemon itself, in the tests. Or python-dbusmock to
do more specific mocking of DBus
Please file bugs for any such issues you encounter. This mailing list
isn't the place to file bug reports. They need to be reported against
the relevant packages, on Launchpad. Thanks.
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 09:33 -0800, Murdoc wrote:
So here are a couple of glitches I've encountered so far:
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 10:45 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:49 AM, C de-Avillez hgg...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I thought in UNIX (and Linux, and similar) we did not depend on the
extension of a file name.
Try:
$ eog /usr/share/backgrounds/warty-final-ubuntu.png
Don't make
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 00:00 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
If it's totally broke, let's drop it and backport it if/when it gets
fixed. A backport will appear in software center just like something in
the main archive if there's no archive version for it AIUI (apt
certainly treats it that way
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:06 -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
On 03/05/2013 04:41 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
I think different segments of the community have different ideas of what
stable means:
Distro devs power users: stable == things don't break
App devs, OEMS, NTEU: stable ==
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 14:15 +0100, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
2012/12/26 J Fernyhough j.fernyho...@gmail.com:
Call it a feature request instead. Customise default sync folder on
first setup. Every Linux-compatible sync client has this option. It
also neatly sidesteps any similar issues
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:10 +1000, Kieran Grant wrote:
Hey All,
I am currently using Ubuntu 12.04.1, so I don't know if this is
something that was worked on in Ubuntu 12.10 or is in the planning stage
for Ubuntu 13.04, but I am wondering if it's possible for something to
be done about the
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 08:32 +1000, Kieran Grant wrote:
Whether it is better to allow users to add icons to their Desktop (where
they'll probably not use it) or not, is something that Canonical and the
upstream GNOME guys can ponder.
Something that has always worked in GNOME (though I don't
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 17:39 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
some time ago, when I've moved my notebook (4GB RAM),
from 32bit gentoo to 64bit ubuntu, I've noticed a big
increase in memory consumption.
I haven't had a chance for deeper look at the code, but
my suspicion is that a
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 15:42 -0600, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
This is the nature of a stable release. Better the devil we know. This
is the reason why we ask for simple, easy to understand patches, or
require an extremely detailed
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 02:02 -0500, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
1. Where is the discussion channel?
I know this list may not be a good choice.
#ubuntuone on Freenode IRC.
2. Why is it available in English only?
I find it annoying to find Chinese artists and songs using English names.
I guess
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 15:52 +, Bruno Girin wrote:
It's a couple of weeks late for UDS-R but what about creating a
blueprint for UDS-S? Get the discussion going, gather examples of
privacy issues and what could be done to address them. Then at the next
UDS, we can work out solutions that
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:11 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, November 05, 2012 11:53:03 AM Rodney Dawes wrote:
...
There were large changes to address some specific user concerns around
the dash search, that went in after various freezes were in effect.
...
That's also true
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 10:39 -0600, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Rodney Dawes rodney.da...@canonical.com
wrote:
The store does not have stores for all regions, and in China
you perhaps may be seeing the world store. The songs and
artist names are probably translated
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 13:58 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I don't know if it's been done before or not, but perhaps the Release
Team, and Tech Board, should take up any concerns related to some of the
Canonical projects' involvement in that process, with the appropriate
members of
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 18:07 -0300, Roberto Alsina wrote:
On 10/18/2012 06:04 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
There are good arguments on both sides, and I can probably convince myself
to
be either aggressive or conservative. One of my biggest concerns against
switching early is that we still
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:18 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So if you're trying to support precise-raring in a
single codebase that's currently python2-only, it would be better to focus
on 2.7+3.3 and ignore 3.2 entirely.
For anyone shipping code via .debs or in a PPA though, it's much easier
to
Ditën e Mon, 18/06/2012 më 15.30 -0400, Scott Kitterman ka shkruar:
On Monday, June 18, 2012 01:30:34 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
...
I also think adding the Release Candidate (RC) designation towards the
end of the cycle would encourage more people who are quite wary of
installing pre-release
Ditën e Fri, 08/06/2012 më 10.27 +1200, Robert Ancell ka shkruar:
On 08/06/12 04:48, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to see gnome-nettool removed from the default Ubuntu Desktop
image. It will of course still be available for easy install for those
who want it. Personally, I just use
Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
Sure it's the
good ol' laggy Gwibber,
Can you please clarify what you mean by laggy here? And are
there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
I don't think a couple of people expressing a little frustration with
a couple of missing or removed features, is a good reason to remove
something from the default install.
Even if I use the Twitter web site to interact with it, and gwibber is
slow to update, it is useful to see the
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 12:46 -0500, Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Rodney Dawes
rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote:
I don't think a couple of people expressing a little frustration with
a couple of missing or removed features, is a good reason to remove
something
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 17:21 -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
If the Twitter website is sufficiently fast and feature-full that
Gwibber can never provide sufficient advantage to outweigh it's cost
in maintenance and CD space, then the correct solution is to remove
it. If it is believed that it can, in
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:37 -0500, Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
I don't need to troll Canonical, you lot do just fine at that by
yourselves. But I'll leave it to a Canonical employee to assume that
everybody who disagrees must be a troll and therefore is one by
default because they are blunt and
Hi All,
On the wiki page[1], it is stated that the UI and user-visible
strings are frozen for applications which are installed by default.
My own understanding was that this was for all apps in the archive, as
was the general understanding of others when I asked in IRC.
However, as we (Ubuntu
It looks like they do not use Launchpad for development, but rather,
the branch on Launchpad is imported from cvs on Sourceforge. That
may also indicate that the upstream is inactive. But you will
need to contact the upstream developers to get any changes
merged into the project.
On Tue,
This is an upstream change to remove all the advanced font settings
from the control panel. You can still set most all of them within
dconf-editor directly though.
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:38 -0300, Ryan Hayle wrote:
It seems that there is no longer a way to set the correct DPI for a
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 10:48 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Phillip Susi ps...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Why bother encrypting / instead of just /home? We already have /home
encryption, which seems to meet the needs of most people.
IIRC, certificates like for IPSec
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:51 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
We have a question in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794353 and
http://bugs.python.org/issue13643 about what encoding bzr and Python
ought to assume for file names if there is no locale configured.
As a specific example, if you run a
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 09:42 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's possible I'm mistaken about the default behavior on Ubuntu
Server,
though - someone please correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe this is
another
reason why we need to get the C.UTF-8 locale going everywhere.
It is definitely not using
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:28 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This isn't quite true. There is a complicated set of environment
variables, and checks in the code, to ensure that display is always
UTF-8, but it generally handles non-UTF-8 filenames gracefully.
It's graceful compared to a python
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:55 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
What is your take on using webkit 1.8? Is that choice good for other
teams? Is there any issue or concern you have about updating?
As an aside, but also a valid issue, regardless of the version we go
with… are there any sort of plans
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 04:44 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 09:39 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
The Fluendo plug-in is the only fully legal MP3 codec implementation
there is to use.
You don't know that for sure Dobey, libmad has never gone to court and
it's status
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 03:47 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
- gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 - Non-free, not sure why we're using this
instead of libmad which is free software.
We aren't using any of them, actually. We are packaging several, which
are not installed by default, within an appropriate
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
as GNOME upstream is moving to use PackageKit and systemd more and more,
I think it would be great, since these 2 provide well known DBus
interfaces, to implement those DBus interfaces in our stack (aptdaemon
and ¿ubuntu-system-service?)
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:32 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
On 21 April 2011 16:14, Allison Randal alli...@canonical.com wrote:
- Only ship a very small shim for the client on the CD (advantage of
small footprint), and do the rest of the install the first time someone
uses Ubuntu One.
This is
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 20:09 +0200, Jan Claeys wrote:
John Rowland Lenton schreef op do 21-04-2011 om 18:23 [+0100]:
* recently we had to upgrade couchdb in lucid for replication to work,
and the upgrade broke replication with the old version (which was the
reason we needed to upgrade),
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:06 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Since the two are not compatible with one another, its entirely possible
that people have built and deployed applications on CouchDB 0.10 and
Ubuntu 10.04, and would be extremely upset if we shoved an update into
the archive that broke
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:10 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Also, why would 10.10 need to be updated in any way if it already
supports the newer protocol?
In 10.10 and 11.04, we already ship CouchDB 1.0. Why should users
continue to have two versions installed after an upgrade to either of
those
58 matches
Mail list logo
