On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are stable
and useful before they upload, and our processes protect us from most
mistakes these days. The result is that 13.04 has been as robust a release
over the
On 28 February 2013 17:05, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are stable
and useful before they upload, and our processes protect us from most
mistakes these
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:17:17PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
[emphasis mine]
But just like debian we know have britney, together with many
automatic adt tests which we run on all reverse dependencies in
jenkins. Uploading beta version of software into sid has never been
welcomed and by
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com wrote:
But just like debian we know have britney, together with many
automatic adt tests which we run on all reverse dependencies in
jenkins. Uploading beta version of software into sid has never been
welcomed and by
On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
point at some time in the future of being more stable than testing in a
rolling
On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
point at some time in the future of
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 06:17:17 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
On 28 February 2013 17:05, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote:
Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are
stable
and useful
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 03:11:27 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the
point at some
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:59:19 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:11:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
built packages or block
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:16:57PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I do think that while 75% of the archive is imported unmodified from
Debian, the vast majority of these packages are in the long tail that
both a) don't individually have many users in Ubuntu, and b) don't have
anyone paying
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 01:38:28 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:16:57PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I do think that while 75% of the archive is imported unmodified from
Debian, the vast majority of these packages are in the long tail that
both a) don't
On 02/28/2013 11:03 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Micah Gersten [2013-02-28 13:33 -0600]:
Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the
built packages or block based on RC bugs filed.
Not on RC bugs, but we can still block them manually. Pinging any
release team member
12 matches
Mail list logo
