Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:13 PM Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > On 29/04/2020 00:10, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > Dan, Billy, and all... > > part of the result from this thread is at: > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/ > > And the fence agents

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On 29/04/2020 00:10, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > Dan, Billy,and all... > > part of the result from this thread is at: > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/ >

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

Dan, Billy,and all... part of the result from this thread is at: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/ and will at the Ubuntu Server Guide for 20.04 (Ubuntu HA s

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Xen - xen unprivileged domains > > as cpaelzer mentioned, Xen should probably move up to the 'best > effort' section; this was just moved out of main in focal. Xen's status before focal was awkward: the source

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

> > > > pgsql - pgsql database instance > > > > > > shouldn't this be in fully supported? > > > > Pgsql is in [universe]. Unless SEG supports pgsql "by default", do you ? > > We're talking about postgresql right? It's definitely supported (it's > in main), and from a quick look

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:47 PM Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > > I added a few comments below, otherwise all the categories look > > reasonable to me, thanks! > > Thanks for the feedback Dan! > > > > clvm- clvmd daemon (cluster logical vol manager) > > > > Was clvm dropped from

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:24 PM Seth Arnold wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > Xen - xen unprivileged domains > > > > as cpaelzer mentioned, Xen should probably move up to the 'best > > effort' section; this was just moved out of main

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

> I'm not sure where exactly this Xen resource agent should be placed on > the list -- but in practice, Xen wasn't in main, and that may influence > your thinking. I'll follow @cpaelzer's suggestion and keep it in "best effort". No hard commitment as it is in [universe], but at least some commitm

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

> I added a few comments below, otherwise all the categories look > reasonable to me, thanks! Thanks for the feedback Dan! > > clvm- clvmd daemon (cluster logical vol manager) > > Was clvm dropped from lvm2? > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.03.02-2ubuntu1 > I hav

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

gt; the > "fence agents" list yet. That will be another list. > > I'm particularly interested in feedback from @jamespage and @ddstreet as > they > probably have good intel about resources usage BUT anyone is welcome to > provide > comments! > > Thank you

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

> I added a few comments below but I must admit that I didn't completely > get what you want. I'm sorry then, let me try to explain better... > The list includes so many things, what are you expecting: > - if they are important overall? > - if they are important for HA cases? > - if they should b

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

whether we > should > move resources from one category to the other. *NOTE* that I'm not > giving > the > "fence agents" list yet. That will be another list. > > I'm particularly interested in feedback from @jamespage and @ddstreet > as > they &g

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

then send a mail again to the list here with a TL;DR and a list of link-per-topic. What do you think? > So please, take some time to provide feedback about this list, whether we > should > move resources from one category to the other. *NOTE* that I'm not giving > the

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

> -Original Message- > From: Felipe Reyes > > > > > - "Deprecated" packages: > > > > - heartbeat > > - keepalived > > keepalived is used by OpenStack Neutron. In this context what would > "deprecated" mean?. > > apt-rdepends -r keepalived > Reading package lists... Done > Building d

RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

d @ddstreet as they probably have good intel about resources usage BUT anyone is welcome to provide comments! Thank you very much in advance! RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability # ## FULLY SUPPORTED (managed service is likely in main or is important enough) # # trivial agents