-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Fink schrieb:
I just read this article:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/
Just FYI: Mark Shuttleworth just replied to the blog post:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/#comment-12124
Canonical has
2008/6/8 Alexandre Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm not sure I'm on the correct list here.
I'm trying to setup a customized CD for future installations on a large
number of computers. During the installation, I'll have no network, so I
can only depend on CD.
Why don't you just use UCK
My vote goes to either Rhythmbox or Amarok. I have over 100,000 songs.
Neither Exaile or Banshee seem to finish indexing that many.
Printed on 100-percent recycled electrons.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
I think it's ok to facilitate the purchase of codecs to watch content
from the non-free world, but why is the video on the site in a
non-free format?
http://www.canonical.com/netbooks
If you want to work to make sure that open codecs become more widely
adopted, then you should start providing
Matthew Nuzum pisze:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Przemysław Kulczycki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now let's get to the point.
One of the often accusations against Ubuntu is that it only takes from
other
projects (Debian, Red Hat, Novell/Suse...) and doesn't give back
anything.
Ubuntu should
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Evan Dandrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:20 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
I have never been able to get Rythmbox to update my iPod nor my wifes.
Then please file a bug.
The Rhythmbox webpage only says it can read from iPods and other
Am Montag, den 09.06.2008, 11:05 -0400 schrieb Darren Albers:
Well you were correct it does work, but I had to remove all the
content on the iPOD and then add it again for it to work. It is odd
since gtkpod worked fine. I guess there was something wrong with the
local database on the iPod
On 09/06/08 at 16:02 +0200, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
Matthew Nuzum pisze:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Przemysław Kulczycki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now let's get to the point.
One of the often accusations against Ubuntu is that it only takes from
other
projects (Debian, Red Hat,
2008/6/9 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was a Banshee user for about 9 months or so. That ended a year ago.
Unless it's changed, Banshee only recognizes songs you have imported. It
does not monitor directories for new songs, and especially not recursively.
Yep, and for this very
Mark Fink wrote:
I just read this article:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/
I hope this is wrong or I will have to stop using ubuntu and find
another distro to use. Such a shame...
Mark, Remco
There is (again) absolutely no truth to the rumour that Canonical has
This is what I call very good openness. Hope this continues and a fix to
bug #1 is found soon. :)
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Fink wrote:
I just read this article:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/
I hope this
And there goes another reason why such proposals and suggestions
should be replaced with nice, cute, understandable feature sheet aka
HIG or LSB. People don't like removed features and it should be taken
into account. And it is better to fix application than propose new
replacement. And even if
Am Montag, den 09.06.2008, 21:47 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Is there any interest in creating that kind of LSB for desktop
features - or is there already something like this? As far as I see,
it would help desktop testing a lot and would help with priorities in
bug fixing.
What about
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over Rhythmbox:
1) Complete iPod support (Rythmbox only supports reading from iPods)
2) Large support for reading and writing from various media players.
3) Integration with
Mark (Shuttleworth),
You know, I mostly agree with this viewpoint. (I should also point out
that I wasn't really a part of this discussion, as I only commented on
the non-free codec of the video) There is no point in preventing users
from watching their non-free videos legally. And it is probably
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over Rhythmbox:
1) Complete iPod support (Rythmbox only supports reading from iPods)
2) Large
Hey Remco,
I only have/had two problems with the situation, and that's not
something against Canonical per se
I do have some problems with this but it can not be solved by limiting
the users workstation; I don't even believe it's right to keep certain
formats off the CD for instance keeping
Good read, and more elegantly put than the way I said it. One most
look beyond the ultimate goal of total freedom of software and be
pragmatic. Technically, one must follow the law, and proprietary
codecs are too widely used to ignore.
Mark very well summed it up, I need not go on.
On 6/9/08,
Am 09.06.2008 um 21:40 schrieb Remco:
How are their users going to learn about free file formats,
and why it is important? For them it's not even important anymore,
because they can play it anyway. This continues the ruling of the
proprietary codec organizations.
While this problem ist hard
Not sure if this is the correct forum for this, but dpkg-buildpackage
has an issue when a cdbs compliant rules file specifies a deb
destination directory to be different then '..'. The problem comes about
from this part of the dpkg-buildpackage script.
chg=../$pva.changes
withecho dpkg-genchanges
Op maandag 09-06-2008 om 11:47 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Krzysztof
Lichota:
2008/6/8 Alexandre Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not sure I'm on the correct list here.
I'm trying to setup a customized CD for future installations on a large
number of computers. During the installation,
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 15:59 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
Hey Remco,
I only have/had two problems with the situation, and that's not
something against Canonical per se
I do have some problems with this but it can not be solved by limiting
the users workstation; I don't even believe it's
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 19:54 +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote:
Sorry for dropping in.
Has there been any mention of Microsoft that they will never, ever sue
anyone who uses Mono nor the Mono developers themselves, or is this
all under the Novell/Microsoft convenant? If they never made such a
Just that Mono implements more than that; surely System.Windows.Forms ist
not part of the ECMA spec? What about Moonlight? It would be a very wise
step to separate the ECMA and non-ECMA parts in the Mono upstream so that if
hard comes to harder, it can be easily removed from the Mono distribution.
It sucks, but that's software patents for you.
It's sucks? no eating a bad piece of pie and farting too much sucks.
Having your laws slapped in your face by greedy bastards that's an
insult several levels above sucks my friend.
I don't believe in these so called licenses, they didn't make the
25 matches
Mail list logo
