John,
2.6.28 will come out around January and Jaunty will probably ship with
2.6.29 but it very well might not be a good idea to use it by default
for Jaunty which is what shirish seemed to be talking about. Just
because it is not considered development status doesn't necessarily mean
it is
Am 05.11.2008 um 14:08 schrieb Jim Legget:
I have a LAN with 9 machines consisting of a mixture of UBUNTU
Linux and
Windows Vista / XP operating systems.
I have found there is too much hand editing of configuration files
such as
NSSWITCH.CONF, SMB.CONF and others to make it worthwhile.
Olá jude e a todos.
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 16:58:53 jude ui wrote:
Where is the code for that? I've treid to find it on lanchpad...(however I
really faild)..
You should have tried the wiki:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkManager/Hardware/3G/Probing
--
BUGabundo :o)
(``-_-´´)
At any rate, regardless of whether we use it or not, making a bug in
Launchpad is not going to change the course of action. My point was that
Shirish should have first checked with the handful of core-devs and kernel
devs who have a good understanding of filesystem development in the kernel
tree,
Please, consider this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/294454
--
WBR,
Alexander Isaenko
ICQ 28055660
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Hi,
According to the recent benchmarking article by Phoronix, the previous two
releases of Ubuntu are significantly slower than Feisty Fawn. In some cases
this can be seen as up to 50% performance drop with certain desktop tasks.
I can confirm that this is true in that my girlfriends desktop
2008/11/6 mr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
According to the recent benchmarking article by Phoronix, the previous two
releases of Ubuntu are significantly slower than Feisty Fawn. In some cases
this can be seen as up to 50% performance drop with certain desktop tasks.
I can confirm that this is
Now I remember why I didn't subscribe to this list.
There's no need to e-mail the list hours after filing the bug.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Isaenko Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Please, consider this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/294454
--
hi
The package eeepc-acpi-source was available for Intrepid during beta, but
has now disappeared from the repository?
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=defaultsection=allarch=anysearchon=nameskeywords=eeepc-acpi-source
Hope someone can help out. I am trying to fix the mute hotkey (Fn+F7)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:58:51PM +0100, mr wrote:
Hi,
According to the recent benchmarking article by Phoronix, the previous two
releases of Ubuntu are significantly slower than Feisty Fawn. In some cases
this can be seen as up to 50% performance drop with certain desktop tasks.
I can
Whoops, I thought you were talking about the recent article about -intel
performance on x45 chips. But I see you're actually talking about an
earlier article about Ubuntu performance in general:
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13022
Note that in that article they looked only at the
I'm not convined those Phoronix test are really that accurate, especially
after reading this one:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=ubuntu_macosxnum=1
It looks like they are not really comparing apples to apples, especially
when it comes to java benchmarking. They're using very
Anyway, it does look like linux wins in the end.
I do not believe that is a good thing; Just because Gnu/Linux can be
faster than windows vista doesn't automatically mean we are serving our
users well.
The good news always comes from the users directly who never complain
about slowness. When
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:38 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
Anyway, it does look like linux wins in the end.
I do not believe that is a good thing; Just because Gnu/Linux can be
faster than windows vista doesn't automatically mean we are serving our
users well.
Yes, the response on /. to
Quoting Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:58:51PM +0100, mr wrote:
Hi,
According to the recent benchmarking article by Phoronix, the previous two
releases of Ubuntu are significantly slower than Feisty Fawn. In some cases
this can be seen as up to 50%
faster than Vista isn't hard, we want it to be faster than XP because
remember, that's what most people are running. Why would they switch to
Ubuntu if it's going to make their machine slower?
I think performance is a very relative term. Slow for games can be great for
a database. I am a lot
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 20:41 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
The disk IO performance decrease from Gutsy to Hardy is anything but
anecdotal.
This (
http://groups.google.com/group/zumastor/browse_thread/thread/7e413960ddc22811#
) bug report in the Zumastor project has some (quite
Am 06.11.2008 um 20:21 schrieb Dan Colish:
They're using very different gcc versions between the os's.
Well, newer gcc's are meant to produce faster code, aren't they?
MarKus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
18 matches
Mail list logo
