Re: Eclipse is stagnating

2009-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Oli Warner wrote: > Jaunty is shipping Eclipse version 3.2. That's about two years old -- a > massive amount of time -- and since then there have been innumerable fixes. > There has been a bug calling for its upgrade since 3.3 came out 20-something > months ago. Th

Re: Kubuntu 9.04RC1 LiveCD excessive hard drive activity, whilst idle

2009-04-17 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Friday 17 April 2009 8:40:13 am Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I just tried out the Kubuntu 9.04 RC1 LiveCD on my desktop. After a >> couple of minutes it starts accessing the hard drives as well as the CD >> itself, causing an unresponsive system. Th

Re: Kubuntu 9.04RC1 LiveCD excessive hard drive activity, whilst idle

2009-04-17 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Friday 17 April 2009 8:40:13 am Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Hello all, > > I just tried out the Kubuntu 9.04 RC1 LiveCD on my desktop. After a > couple of minutes it starts accessing the hard drives as well as the CD > itself, causing an unresponsive system. This is while the system is idle > o

Eclipse is stagnating

2009-04-17 Thread Oli Warner
Jaunty is shipping Eclipse version 3.2. That's about two years old -- a massive amount of time -- and since then there have been innumerable fixes. There has been a bug calling for its upgrade since 3.3 came out 20-something months ago. That bug has since gone through versions 3.4, 3.4.1 and now 3.

Kubuntu 9.04RC1 LiveCD excessive hard drive activity, whilst idle

2009-04-17 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Hello all, I just tried out the Kubuntu 9.04 RC1 LiveCD on my desktop. After a couple of minutes it starts accessing the hard drives as well as the CD itself, causing an unresponsive system. This is while the system is idle otherwise. At first I thought it was some kind of indexing service. Wh

Re: Removing tor from jaunty (unmaintained)

2009-04-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Helllo again, Martin Pitt [2009-03-09 11:19 +0100]: > a while ago we discussed how to maintain tor in stable releases [1]. > > However, it turns out that this doesn't work after all, since we have > nobody who actually maintains tor in Ubuntu. Thus the current > hardy/intrepid versions are horrib